大类招生和专业分流对学生成绩及培养质量影响的实证研究
A Verification Study on the Effects of General Enrollment and Major Diversion on Students’ Scores and Cultivation Quality
DOI: 10.12677/AE.2023.134332, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李志生, 王晓霞, 颜 彪:广东工业大学土木与交通工程学院,广东 广州
关键词: 大类招生专业分流学生成绩培养质量实证研究General Major Enrollment Major Diversion Student Score Cultivation Quality Verification Study
摘要: 专业大类招生政策和专业分流人才培养是近年来教育改革的重要措施之一。大类招生和专业分流在具备优势的同时,也带来了一定的副作用。本文总结了近年来大类招生政策和专业分流人才培养的弊端。通过2019级和2020级各八个专业的长期成绩跟踪对比分析,实例证明了大类招生政策和专业分流人才培养所造成的成绩差异及培养质量的影响。研究结论认为,大类招生政策虽具备较多优点,但容易造成该大类下各小专业学生成绩的两极分化,该大类专业下的强势专业将虹吸弱势专业的资源和生源,不利于大类专业下各小专业的均衡发展。此外,大类招生还存在适用性情形,即对该大类专业下各专业特性、专业实力和专业资源相差不大时比较合适。本文的研究结论可以为各高等院校在进行大类招生与专业分流时提供借鉴和参考。
Abstract: The general enrollment policy of major categories and the cultivation of professional talents are one of the important measures of educational reform in recent years. While having advantages, general enrollment and major diversion have also brought certain side effects. This paper summarized the disadvantages of the general enrollment policy and the cultivation of professional talents in recent years. Through the long-term performance tracking and comparative analysis of eight majors in 2019 and 2020 as examples, we have proved the difference in performance and the impact of training quality caused by major enrollment policies and professional talent training. The conclu-sion of the study is that although the general enrollment policy of the major category has many advantages, it is easy to bring the polarization of the students’ grades of the small majors under the major category. The strong majors under the major category will siphon the resources and students of the weak majors, which is not conducive to the balanced development of the small majors under the major category. In addition, there are applicability situations in the enrollment of major categories, that is, it is more appropriate when there is little difference in the characteristics, professional strength and professional resources of each major under this major category. The research conclusion of this paper can provide reference for colleges and universities when carrying out general major enrollment and professional diversion.
文章引用:李志生, 王晓霞, 颜彪. 大类招生和专业分流对学生成绩及培养质量影响的实证研究[J]. 教育进展, 2023, 13(4): 2114-2121. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2023.134332

参考文献

[1] 李琰琰, 沈雁飞, 王炳忠, 吴俊威. 新高考背景下专业分流实施和学生后续培养探索[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2020, 47(11): 193-194.
[2] 李莉. 大类招生制度下旅游管理类专业分流制度的实践与探索——以重庆第二师范学院为例[J]. 重庆第二师范学院学报, 2021, 34(1): 112-115.
[3] 王路, 赵海田, 张磊. 高校大类招生分类培养实践运行中的问题与对策[J]. 黑龙江教育学院学报, 2019, 38(8): 4-6.
[4] 赵韩强, 陈龙. 计算机类专业“大类招生, 专业分流”培养模式研究——以西安电子科技大学为例[J]. 工业和信息化教育, 2022, 10(2): 67-71.
[5] 刘雅婧, 席景会, 王英, 李景文, 闫帆, 赵磊, 王庆钰. 研究型大学农学专业“大类招生, 分流培养”模式探索与实践[J]. 高教学刊, 2020, 6(19): 150-152.
[6] 孙红卫, 董艳萍, 郑宇梅. 高职“大类招生, 分流培养”模式存在的问题及对策[J]. 河北工程技术高等专科学校学报, 2015, 26(4): 78-80.
[7] 万俊毅, 尹然平. 大类培养学生专业分流存在的问题与改进建议[J]. 高等农业教育, 2014, 10(10): 47-50.
[8] 潘中祥. 高校大类培养模式下学风建设的问题与对策——基于浙江科技学院信息与电子工程学院的实证研究[J]. 浙江科技学院学报, 2015, 27(2): 99-104.
[9] 张世敏, 蔡扬, 王捧军, 戎来. 大类招生背景下专业分流问题研究——以河北经贸大学会计学院为例[J]. 河北经贸大学学报(综合版), 2013, 13(1): 112-115.
[10] 吕思雅, 吴方. 独立学院实施“大类招生、分流培养”模式的若干问题及对策探析[J]. 教育与教学研究, 2018, 32(9): 31-36.