中国孕妇曲面辐射剂量模型的构建及外照射剂量学研究
Construction of a Surface Radiation Dose Phantom and External Exposure Dosimetry Study for Pregnant Women in China
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2023.125256, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 夏明琛, 章浩伟, 刘 颖:上海理工大学健康科学与工程学院,上海;路鹤晴*:同济大学附属第一妇婴保健院设备科,上海
关键词: 中国孕妇模型MRI图像BREP构建法中子源标准入射条件Chinese Pregnant Woman Phantom MRI Images BREP Construction Method Neutron Sources Standard Incidence Conditions
摘要: 本文基于六个月孕妇MRI图像集并结合中国参考人数据,通过Matlab对图像进行预处理操作,使用手动分割和自动分割相结合的方法建立三维初始器官模型,再对初始器官进行优化并且生成NURBS曲面,通过逆向工程三维实体建模技术并依据解剖学分布数据对其进行装配构建起中国孕妇的曲面体模BREP-P6。该模型包含30多个器官,胎儿主要的构建部分有大脑、骨骼及软组织部分。分别计算了在五种不同标准入射条件下体外中子源(10−9 MeV~20 MeV)所致孕妇曲面模型中胎儿剂量转换系数,并将其结果跟RPI-P6模型进行对比。在五种入射条件下,随着中子源能量的增加,吸收剂量转换系数在两种模型的增长趋势基本一致,在10−9 MeV~1 MeV能量区域内,系数增长缓慢且误差较小,在1 MeV~20 MeV能量区域内,该系数增长较快。吸收剂量转换系数随着光子能量的增加,呈现正增长趋势。
Abstract: In this paper, based on a six-month MRI image set of pregnant women and combined with Chinese reference human data, we used Matlab to pre-process the images, combined manual segmentation and automatic segmentation to build a 3D initial organ model, then optimized the initial organs and generated NURBS surfaces, and assembled them by reverse engineering 3D solid modeling tech-niques and based on anatomical distribution data to build surface model BREP-P6. The model con-tains more than 30 organs, and the main parts of the fetus are brain, bone and soft tissue. The fetal dose conversion coefficients in the surface model of pregnant women due to in vitro neutron sources (10−9 MeV~20 MeV) were calculated under five different standard incidence conditions, and the re-sults were compared with the RPI-P6 model. Under the five incident conditions, the growth trends of the absorbed dose conversion coefficients with increasing neutron source energy are basically the same in both models, with slow growth and small errors in the 10−9 MeV~1 MeV energy region and faster growth in the 1 MeV~20 MeV energy region.
文章引用:夏明琛, 章浩伟, 路鹤晴, 刘颖. 中国孕妇曲面辐射剂量模型的构建及外照射剂量学研究[J]. 应用数学进展, 2023, 12(5): 2553-2560. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2023.125256

参考文献

[1] Saeed, M.K. (2021) Comparison of Estimated and Calculated Fetal Radiation Dose for a Pregnant Woman Who Under-went Computed Tomography and Conventional X-Ray Examinations Based on a Phantom Study. Radiological Physics and Technology, 14, 25-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Li, X., Yang, K., Westra, S.J. and Liu, B. (2021) Fetal Dose Evaluation for Body CT Examinations of Pregnant Patients during All Stages of Pregnancy. European Journal of Radiology, 141, Article ID: 109780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Abadi, E., Segars, W.P., Tsui, B.M.W., et al. (2020) Virtual Clin-ical trials in Medical Imaging: A Review. Journal of Medical Imaging, 7, Article ID: 042805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Stabin, M.G., Xu, X.G., Emmons, M.A., et al. (2012) RADAR Reference Adult, Pediatric, and Pregnant Female Phantom Series for Internal and External Dosimetry. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 53, 1807-1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Zhang, H., Sun, S., Lu, H. and Liu, Y. (2020) Construction and Application of Brep Phantom for Chinese Women of Childbearing Age in Radiation Protection. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 189, 407-419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Shi, C. and Xu, X.G. (2004) Development of a 30-Week-Pregnant Female Tomographic Model from Computed Tomography (CT) Images for Monte Carlo Organ Dose Calculations. Medical Physics, 31, 2491-2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Xu, X.G., Taranenko, V., Zhang, J. and Shi, C. (2007) A Bounda-ry-Representation Method for Designing Whole-Body Radiation Dosimetry Models: Pregnant Females at the Ends of Three Gestational Periods—RPI-P3, -P6 and -P9. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 52, 7023-7044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Nagaoka, T., Togashi, T., Saito, K., et al. (2007) An Anatomi-cally Realistic Whole-Body Pregnant-Woman Model and Specific Absorption Rates for Pregnant-Woman Exposure to Electromagnetic Plane Waves from 10 MHz to 2 GHz. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 52, 6731-6743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Ange, E., Wellnitz, C.V., et al. (2008) Radiation Dose to the Fetus for Pregnant Patients Undergoing Multidetector CT Imaging: Monte Carlo Simulations Estimating Fetal Dose for a Range of Gestational Age and Patient Size. Radiology, 249, 220-227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Maynard, M.R., Long, N.S., Moawad, N.S., et al. (2014) The UF Family of Hybrid Phantoms of the Pregnant Female for Computational Radiation Dosimetry. Physics in Medicine & Bi-ology, 59, 4325-4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Xie, T. and Zaidi, H. (2016) Development of Computational Pregnant Female and Fetus Models and Assessment of Radiation Dose from Positron-Emitting Tracers. European Jour-nal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 43, 2290-2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Rafat-Motavalli, L., Miri-Hakimabad, H. and Hoseinian-Azghadi, E. (2018) Hybrid Pregnant Reference Phantom Series Based on Adult Female ICRP Reference Phantom. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 144, 386-395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Bozkurt, A., Chao, T.C., Xu, X.G., Bozkurt, A. and Chao, T.C. (2000) Fluence-to-Dose Conversion Coefficients from Monoenergetic Neutrons Below 20 MeV Based on The VIP-Man Anatomical Model. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 45, 3059-3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Vaz, P. (2014) Radiation Protection and Dosimetry Issues in the Medical Applications of Ionizing Radiation. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 104, 23-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Taranenko, V. and Xu, X.G. (2008) Fluence to Absorbed Foetal Dose Conversion Coefficients for Photons in 50 keV-10 GeV Calculated Using RPI-P Models. Radiation Protec-tion Dosimetry, 131, 159-166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Taranenko, V. and Xu, X.G. (2008) Fluence-to-Absorbed-Dose Conver-sion Coefficients for Neutron Beams from 0.001 eV to 100 GeV Calculated for a Set of Pregnant Female and Fetus Models. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 53, 1425-1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Taranenko, V. and Xu, X.G. (2009) Foetal Dose Conversion Co-efficients for ICRP-Compliant Pregnant Models from Idealised Proton Exposures. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 133, 65-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Yeom, Y.S., Griffin, K.T., Mille, M.M., et al. (2022) Fetal Dose from Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Craniospinal Irradiation During Pregnancy: A Monte Carlo Study. Physics in Medi-cine & Biology, 67, Article ID: 035003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Karbalaee, M., Shahbazi-Gahrouei, D. and Tavakoli, M.B. (2017) An Approach in Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning: A Fast, GPU-Based Monte Carlo Method. Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors, 7, 108-113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Segars, W.P. (2001) Development and Application of the New Dynamic NURBS-Based CardiacTorso(NCAT) Phantom. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, 110-156.