赣南台网天然地震与人工爆破的信号特征研究
Analysis of the Recording Characteristics of Earthquakes and Artificial Blasting in Gannan Seismic Network
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2023.137071, PDF,   
作者: 赖智华:江西省赣州地震台,江西 赣州;邓月圆, 罗叶美:赣州地震监测中心站,江西 赣州
关键词: 地震爆破频谱分析地震和爆破特征Earthquake Blast Spectrum Analysis Characteristics of Earthquake and Blast
摘要: 本研究旨在解决区分工业爆破与天然地震地震波波形的问题,以提高地震监测台站人员的快速识别能力。通过对赣南数字地震台网记录到的同一地区工业爆破和天然地震的进行时域特征的分析和频谱分析的比较,我们发现人工爆破和天然地震的地震波波形在很大程度上相似。然而,在震中距较近的记录台站(30 km以内),两者的频谱差异较明显。天然地震的速度谱与位移谱的优势频率和振幅峰值主要集中在低频区,而人工爆破没有明显的优势频率,频率的分布更为均匀。随着震中距的增加,地震与爆破速度谱与位移谱的优势频率和振幅峰值的分布主要在中频与中低频区域,直到最后优势频率与振幅峰值均集中在低频区域。然而,地震与爆破地震的速度谱与位移谱在震中距较大时,差异不再明显。研究结果表明,这种现象可作为地震台站人员快速识别人工爆破和天然地震的一项有效指标,对提高地震监测准确性和地震应急响应具有重要意义。
Abstract: This study aims to address the issue of distinguishing industrial explosions from natural earth-quakes, to enhance the rapid recognition ability of seismic monitoring station personnel. We conducted a spectral analysis and comparison of industrial explosions and natural earthquakes recorded in the same region by the Gannan Digital Seismic Network. The waveform morphology of industrial explosions and natural earthquakes was found to be significantly similar. However, at recording stations closer to the epicenter (within 30 km), the spectral differences between the two became more apparent. The dominant frequency and amplitude peak of the velocity and displacement spectra of natural earthquakes are primarily concentrated in the low-frequency region, while industrial explosions do not display a clear dominant frequency, and the frequency distribution is more uniform. As the epicentral distance increases, the distribution of the dominant frequency and amplitude peak of the earthquake and explosion velocity and displacement spectra are mainly in the mid-frequency and mid-to-low frequency regions, until ultimately, both are concentrated in the low-frequency region. However, the differences between the velocity and displacement spectra of the earthquakes and explosions are not significantly noticeable at larger epicentral distances. The results of this study suggest that this phenomenon can serve as an effective indicator for seismic station personnel to rapidly distinguish between industrial explosions and natural earthquakes. This has significant implications for improving the accuracy of earthquake monitoring and emergency response capabilities.
文章引用:赖智华, 邓月圆, 罗叶美. 赣南台网天然地震与人工爆破的信号特征研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2023, 13(7): 747-757. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2023.137071

参考文献

[1] 王禄军, 尹战军, 翟浩, 等. 基于支持向量机的内蒙古地区台网天然地震与人工爆破的自动识别与分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2022, 42(3): 326-330.
[2] 庞聪. 基于MFCC样本熵和灰狼算法优化支持向量机的天然地震与人工爆破自动识别[J]. 地震工程学报, 2022, 44(5): 1169-1175.
[3] Amendola, A., Gabbriellini, G., Dell’aversana, P. and Marini, A.J. (2017) Seismic Facies Analysis through Musical Attributes. Geophysical Prospecting, 65, 49-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 蔡杏辉, 张燕明, 陈惠芳, 等. 基于小波特征和神经网络的天然地震与人工爆破自动识别[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2020, 40(6): 634-639.
[5] 王婷婷, 边银菊, 张博. 地震与爆破的小波包识别判据研究[J]. 地震学报, 2014, 36(2): 220-232.
[6] 田宵, 汪明军, 张雄, 等. 基于多输入卷积神经网络的天然地震和爆破事件识别[J]. 地球物理学报, 2022, 65(5): 1802-1812.
[7] 段刚. 基于卷积神经网络的天然地震与人工爆破识别研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2021, 36(4): 1379-1385.
[8] 杨芳, 朱嘉健, 刘智, 等. 广东地区地震与爆破事件识别方法研究[J]. 华南地震, 2016, 36(3): 110-115.
[9] 蔡杏辉, 邵平荣, 段刚, 等. 福建地区人工爆破与天然地震的判定[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2013, 34(1): 87-91.
[10] 荣伟健, 赵建明, 董祎玮, 等. 曹妃甸地震台网天然地震与人工爆破时频分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2017, 38(5): 39-43.
[11] 高家乙, 刘晓锋, 闫睿. 河南平顶山平煤矿区天然地震、爆破、塌陷时频特征分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2020, 41(3): 67-74.
[12] 安镇文, 魏富胜. 震源性质的时频分析与事件识别[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2011, 32(1): 1-9.
[13] 赖智华. 赣南数字地震台网近震分析与震情速报[J]. 防灾科技学院学报, 2007, 9(1): 69-72.
[14] 王惠琳, 李志雄, 徐晓枫, 等. 琼北确定性人工爆破与天然地震识别判据[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2017, 38(4): 74-80.
[15] 陈梦, 杨龙翔, 高家乙, 等. 河南平顶山平煤矿区天然地震和人工爆破的波形特征及识别判据[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究, 2021, 42(5): 90-96.