关联交易下大股东掏空行为研究——以ST天马为例
Research on the Hollowing-Out Behavior of Major Shareholders under Related Party Transactions—Taking ST Tianma as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/FIN.2023.135112, PDF,   
作者: 钟子微, 邹怡婷:江西工业工程职业技术学院经济管理学院,江西 萍乡
关键词: 大股东掏空上市公司信息披露The Majority Shareholder Hollowed-Out Listed Companies Information Disclosure
摘要: 随着资本市场的不断壮大,证券市场上不断涌现出大股东利用关联交易掏空上市公司的事件。文章以大股东掏空ST天马为典型案例,分析其掏空天马公司的路径与经济后果。研究发现,天马公司大股东利用关联方关系占用大量公司的非经营性资金,以公司名义对外借款,利用基金收购大股东的资产来将公司的资金转移至大股东处,天马公司的内部控制失效也为大股东掏空的行为提供了合适的外部环境,最终导致天马公司的盈利能力和现金流受到了极大的影响。本文从内部控制的角度提出改进公司权力结构、完善内部控制体系,为对规范大股东行为、保护中小投资者的切身利益、维护资本市场秩序提供借鉴。
Abstract: With the continuous growth of the capital market, incidents have emerged in the securities market where major shareholders use related party transactions to hollow out listed companies. This paper takes the hollowing out of ST Tianma by a major shareholder as a typical case to analyze the path and economic consequences of hollowing out Tianma Company. The study found that the major shareholder of Tianma Company used the relationship of related parties to occupy a large amount of the company’s non-operating funds, borrowed money in the name of the company, and used the fund to acquire the assets of the major shareholder to transfer the company’s funds to the major shareholder, and the failure of Tianma’s internal control also provided a suitable external environment for the behavior of the major shareholder to hollow out, which ultimately led to the great impact of Tianma’s profitability and cash flow. From the perspective of internal control, this paper proposes to improve the company’s power structure and improve the internal control system, so as to provide a reference for regulating the behavior of major shareholders, protecting the vital interests of small and medium-sized investors, and maintaining the order of the capital market.
文章引用:钟子微, 邹怡婷. 关联交易下大股东掏空行为研究——以ST天马为例[J]. 金融, 2023, 13(5): 1059-1067. https://doi.org/10.12677/FIN.2023.135112

参考文献

[1] 黄泽悦, 罗进辉, 李向昕. 中小股东“人多势众”的治理效应——基于年度股东大会出席人数的考察[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(4): 159-185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 郭孟竺, 王艳丽. 大股东掏空及其治理分析[J]. 财会通讯, 2018(6): 55-58.
[3] 吴国鼎. 大股东控制下的债务融资: 抑制还是便利了大股东掏空? [J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2022(9): 104-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 叶康涛, 祝继高, 陆正飞, 张然. 独立董事的独立性: 基于董事会投票的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2011, 46(1): 126-139.
[5] 潘启东. 董事会治理、机构投资者抱团与大股东掏空[J]. 财会通讯, 2023(2): 32-37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 张继德, 徐悦华, 韩旭, 等. 从康芝药业关联并购中山爱护看大股东掏空[J]. 会计之友, 2023(14): 119-127.
[7] 赵国宇, 翟秋玲, 禹薇. 大股东掏空视角下的CEO激励问题研究[J]. 会计之友, 2020(17): 111-118.
[8] 耀友福. 关键审计事项披露能抑制大股东掏空行为吗?——来自掏空关键事项的证据[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2022, 24(5): 92-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef