近5年来针灸治疗干眼症的系统评价再评价
Acupuncture and Moxibustion in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease in Recent 5 Years: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
DOI: 10.12677/TCM.2023.129412, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李丹妮, 孔寅子, 李庆云, 沈 峰:湖北中医药大学针灸骨伤学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 干眼症系统评价再评价针灸PRISMAGRADEDry Eye Syndrome (DED) Overview of Systematic Reviews Acupuncture PRISMA GRADE
摘要: 目的:再评价针灸治疗干眼症系统评价(SR)的报告质量与证据质量。方法:检索PubMed、EMbase、Cochrane Library、SinoMed、CNKI、维普、万方等数据库2018年1月1日至2023年1月1日的系统评价/meta分析,使用NoteExpress 3.2.0进行文献管理,运用PRISMA、GRADE对纳入文献进行评估。结果:最终纳入9篇相关文献,其中GRADE评级结果显示文献证据质量普遍不高;PRISMA评价报告质量结果显示,纳入文献得分区间为16~22.5分,平均20.4分。结论:近5年来针灸治疗干眼症优于人工泪液等疗法,受纳入文献质量,今后需开展更高水平的多中心随机对照试验加以验证,并建议诊治干眼症过程中应结合中医辨证及临床实际合理选择临床方案。但现有针灸疗法治疗干眼的结论尚需开展更多高质量的研究予以验证。
Abstract: Objective: Objective to overview of systematic reviews (SRs) of acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of dry eye disease (DED) and evaluate the quality of report and evidence. Methods: Pub-Med, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI, VIP and Wangfang Data were searched from Janu-ary 1, 2018 to January 1, 2023 for systematic review or meta-analysis. NoteExpress 3.2.0 was used for literature management. PRISMA and GRADE were used to evaluate the literature. Results: Nine relevant literatures were included. The result of GRADE rating shows that the quality of literature evidence is relatively common. The quality of PRISMA evaluation report showed that the score range of the included literature was 16~22.5, with an average of 20.4. Conclusion: In the past 5 years, acupuncture is superior to artificial tears in the treatment of DED. Due to the quality of the literature, it is necessary to carry out a higher level of multicenter randomized controlled trials in the future. It is suggested that the clinical scheme should be reasonably selected according to syn-drome differentiation of traditional Chinese medicine and clinical practice in the treatment of DED. However, the existing conclusion of acupuncture in the treatment of DED needs to be verified by more high-quality research.
文章引用:李丹妮, 孔寅子, 李庆云, 沈峰. 近5年来针灸治疗干眼症的系统评价再评价[J]. 中医学, 2023, 12(9): 2748-2756. https://doi.org/10.12677/TCM.2023.129412

参考文献

[1] Lu, X., Li, J., Ye, S., et al. (2022) Acupuncture for Dry Eye Disease after Recovery from COVID-19: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 101, e31234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 李惠真, 汪旬, 陈奕群, 等. 针刺治疗肝经郁热型干眼症的疗效及对焦虑情绪的影响[J]. 广州中医药大学学报, 2023, 40(8): 1948-1953.
[3] 郑晓骏, 高卫萍. 针刺治疗干眼的研究进展[J]. 中国中医眼科杂志, 2022, 32(5): 389-391.
[4] 王图南, 赵珈宇, 杨易陈, 等. 针灸治疗干眼的网状Meta分析[J]. 针刺研究, 2021, 46(12): 1057-1066.
[5] 卢存存, 杨丰文, 柯立鑫, 等. 系统评价再评价优先报告条目解读[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2018, 13(3): 236-240.
[6] Wei, Q.B., Ding, N., Wang, J.J., et al. (2020) Acupoint Selection for the Treatment of Dry Eye: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 19, 2851-2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Kim, B.H., Kim, M.H., Kang, S.H., et al. (2018) Optimizing Acu-puncture Treatment for Dry Eye Syndrome: A Systematic Review. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 18, Article No. 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Na, J.H., Jung, J.H., Park, J.G., et al. (2021) Therapeutic Effects of Acupuncture in Typical Dry Eye: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Acta Ophthalmologica, 99, 489-498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 赵磊, 左韬, 王方媛, 等. 眼周穴位雷火灸治疗干眼症的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2019, 19(8): 1338-1343.
[10] 张超源, 余燕灵, 彭紫荆, 等. 针刺联合人工泪液治疗干眼Meta分析[J]. 针灸临床杂志, 2020, 36(6): 59-65.
[11] 黄荣, 黄凯, 宋翔, 等. 针刺联合人工泪液治疗干眼症的Meta分析[J]. 中国民间疗法, 2021, 29(24): 88-94.
[12] 余利忠, 谷道宗, 王志亮, 等. 针刺与西药治疗干眼症疗效比较的Meta分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(24): 6015-6019.
[13] 朱永政. 针刺治疗干眼选穴规律分析及系统评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东中医药大学, 2018.
[14] 郭文宣, 曹宁, 韩昀彤, 等. 针灸治疗围绝经期干眼症疗效系统评价[J]. 中国民族民间医药, 2022, 31(2): 80-85.
[15] 蒋维艳, 万珊珊, 杨燕宁. 干眼的诊断与治疗新进展[J/OL]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 2023: 1-7. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3uoqIhG8C45S0n9fL2suRadTyEVl2pW9UrhTDCdPD66HnLTRlT6Ph1DZV9-lwcM4YPdSn10-2nTj91nVpe9hGnRBnGVakdtL&uniplatform=NZKPT, 2023-03-16.
[16] 韦庆波, 林佳, 顾嘉凌, 等. 针灸治疗干眼症的临床与机制研究现状[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2021, 36(1): 319-323.
[17] 钱晨, 陆李还. 陆李还针灸治疗干眼症验案举隅[J]. 中医临床研究, 2022, 14(28): 95-97.
[18] 季昭臣, 胡海殷, 李楠, 王可仪, 金鑫瑶, 庞稳泰, 冯睿, 张俊华. 国内外中医药系统评价再评价研究进展[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2020, 45(8): 1844-1850.
[19] 杨克虎, 刘雅莉, 袁金秋, 等. 发展和完善中的系统评价再评价[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2011, 6(1): 54-57.
[20] 高亚, 刘明, 杨珂璐, 等. 系统评价报告规范: PRISMA 2020与PRISMA 2009的对比分析与实例解读[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2021, 21(5): 606-616.
[21] Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Vist, G., 等. GRADE指南: IV. 证据质量分级——研究的局限性(偏倚风险) [J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(4): 456-463.
[22] Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Kunz, R., 等. GRADE指南: VII. 证据质量评价——不一致性[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(12): 1444-1451.
[23] Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Kunz, R., 等. GRADE指南: VI. 证据质量评价——不精确性(随机误差) [J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(12): 1435-1443.
[24] Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Montori, V., 等. GRADE指南: V. 证据质量评价——发表偏倚[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(12): 1430-1434.