大学生认识性好奇心与学习投入的关系:自我控制双系统的中介和调节作用
The Relationship between Epistemic Curiosity and Learning Engagement among College Students: The Mediating and Moderating Effect of the Dual-Systems of Self-Control
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.1310591, PDF,   
作者: 廖炜妍, 邓志洲*:广东财经大学人力资源学院,广东 广州
关键词: 认识性好奇心自我控制学习投入大学生Epistemic Curiosity Self-Control Learning Engagement College Students
摘要: 为探讨大学生认识性好奇心、学习投入、自我控制的关系及作用机制,采用修订后的I/D认识性好奇心量表、学习投入量表、自我控制双系统量表,对广东省202名高校大学生进行施测。结果发现:1) 认识性好奇心对学习投入有显著的正向预测作用;2) 自我控制双系统的自我控制系统在认识性好奇心与学习投入之间发挥部分中介作用;3) “认识性好奇心→学习投入”这一直接路径受到自我控制双系统的冲动系统的调节,具体表现在:相对于高冲动系统水平,在低冲动系统水平的条件下,认识性好奇心对学习投入的预测作用增强。本研究揭示了认识性好奇心和自我控制对学习投入的影响机制,为如何提高大学生的学习投入提供一定的现实指导意义。
Abstract: In order to explore the relationship and mechanism of epistemic curiosity, learning engagement and self-control among college students, the revised I/D epistemic curiosity scale, learning engagement scale and the dual-systems of self-control scale were used to test 202 college students in Guangdong Province. The results showed that: 1) Epistemic curiosity had a significant positive predictive effect on learning engagement; 2) The self-control system of the dual-systems of self-control plays a partial mediating role between epistemic curiosity and learning engagement; 3) The direct path of “epistemic curiosity → learning engagement” is regulated by the impulse system of the dual-systems of self-control, which is manifested in: relative to the level of high impulse system, the predictive effect of epistemic curiosity on learning input is enhanced under the condition of low impulse system level. This study reveals the influence mechanism of epistemic curiosity and self-control on learning engagement, and provides practical guidance for how to improve college students’ learning engagement.
文章引用:廖炜妍, 邓志洲 (2023). 大学生认识性好奇心与学习投入的关系:自我控制双系统的中介和调节作用. 心理学进展, 13(10), 4697-4705. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.1310591

参考文献

[1] 高斌, 朱穗京, 吴晶玲(2021). 大学生手机成瘾与学习投入的关系: 自我控制的中介作用和核心自我评价的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 400-406.
[2] 李西营, 黄荣(2010). 大学生学习投入量表(UWES-S)的修订报告. 心理研究, 3(1), 84-88.
[3] 刘海昊, 宋洪峰, 章琦伟, 等(2021). 大学生自我控制: 心理资本与在线学习投入的关系. 校园心理, 19(5), 400-404.
[4] 王净宇(2022). 自我控制、跨期选择对学习投入的影响. 硕士学位论文, 石家庄: 河北师范大学.
[5] 温忠麟, 黄彬彬, 汤丹丹(2018). 问卷数据建模前传. 心理科学, 41(1), 204-210.
[6] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟(2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补? 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.
[7] 吴丽君(2023). 认识性好奇对高中生创造性科学问题提出能力的影响. 硕士学位论文, 太原: 山西师范大学.
[8] 谢东杰, 王利刚, 陶婷, 等(2014). 青少年自我控制双系统量表中文版的效度和信度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 28(5), 386-391.
[9] 许珮珮(2020). 初中生认知好奇与学业情绪的关系及其干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 石家庄: 河北师范大学.
[10] 杨雨婷(2022). 高中生未来时间洞察力与学习投入的关系. 硕士学位论文, 福州: 福建师范大学.
[11] 张傲雪, 高佳, 王阳阳, 等(2022). 人类对知识的好奇: 认识性好奇心. 心理发展与教育, 38(3), 427-436.
[12] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[13] 周英杰(2019). 特质认知好奇心对创造性思维作用的认知机制. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[14] Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A Theory of Human Curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45, 180-191.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Binu, K. G., Vijay, V. S., Anusha, M. M. et al. (2020). Influence of Epistemic Curiosity on the Study Approaches of First Year Engineering Students. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 443-451.[CrossRef
[16] Eren, A., & Coskun, H. (2016). Students’ Level of Boredom, Boredom Coping Strategies, Epistemic Curiosity, and Graded Performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 109, 574-588.[CrossRef
[17] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.[CrossRef
[18] Hassan, M. M., Bashir, S., & Mussel, P. (2015). Personality, Learning, and the Mediating Role of Epistemic Curiosity: A Case of Continuing Education in Medical Physicians. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 83-89.[CrossRef
[19] Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and Self-Control from a Dual-Systems Perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162-176.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Huang, D., Wang, L., Zhou, M. et al. (2010). Gender Difference in Motives of Knowledge Searching: Measurement Invariance and Factor Mean Comparison of the Interest/Deprivation Epistemic Curiosity. In 2010 IEEE 2nd Symposium on Web Society (pp. 258-263). IEEE.[CrossRef
[21] Litman, J. A. (2008). Interest and Deprivation Factors of Epistemic Curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1585-1595.[CrossRef
[22] Litman, J. A., & Jimerson, T. L. (2004). The Measurement of Curiosity as a Feeling of Deprivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 147-157.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D. (2003). Measuring Epistemic Curiosity and Its Diversive and Specific Components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 75-86.[CrossRef
[24] Özsaray, A. E., & Eren, A. (2018). Achievement Emotions, Epistemic Curiosity, and Graded Performance of Undergraduate Students in English Preparatory Classes. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies (IJOCIS), 8, 39-58.
[25] Von Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The Hungry Mind: Intellectual Curiosity Is the Third Pillar of Academic Performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 574-588.[CrossRef] [PubMed]