国际原油、中国煤炭与绿色能源股票市场间的溢出效应研究
A Study of Spillovers between International Crude Oil, Chinese Coal and Green Energy Stock Markets
DOI: 10.12677/ORF.2023.136644, PDF,   
作者: 李苏彤, 王 辉:南京信息工程大学数学与统计学院,江苏 南京;叶 鹏:中国移动通信集团设计院有限公司福建分公司,福建 福州
关键词: 跳跃溢出波动溢出金融市场绿色金融Jump SE Volatility SE Financial Market Green Finance
摘要: 研究能源市场间的溢出效应对于研判能源市场的复杂性和风险传递机制具有重要意义。为研究国际原油、中国煤炭及绿色能源股票市场间的溢出效应,本文选取Brent原油期货价格、中证煤炭指数、中证绿色能源指数三组数据进行分析。以新冠疫情的发生时间为节点,使用SVCJ模型分析疫情前后市场间的跳跃溢出。另外,对SVCJ模型所估计出的波动率构建VAR-BEKK-GARCH模型,探究全样本时期的波动溢出。结果显示:疫情暴发使得市场的跳跃行为更为频繁,原油市场在跳跃溢出关系中始终占据主导地位,其对煤炭、绿色能源股票市场的跳跃溢出具有“一日滞后性”;在遇到风险事件的冲击时,原油市场与国内煤炭股市间具有风险传递效应,国内煤炭股市则对绿色能源股市起到调节和稳定作用。这些结论有助于投资者优化投资组合,对国家推进绿色金融发展也具有一定帮助。
Abstract: The study of spillover effects (SEs) among energy markets is important for revealing the complexity of energy markets and risk transfer mechanisms. To explore the SEs between international crude oil, and China’s coal and green energy stock markets, this paper selects the daily closing price data of Brent crude oil futures price, CSI Coal Index and CSI Green Energy Index as the research objects. By taking outbreak time of the COVID-19 pandemic as a crucial time node, we study the change of jump SEs between markets before/after the pandemic by using the SVCJ model. Then, we construct a VAR-BEKK-GARCH model for the volatility estimated by the SVCJ model to explore the volatility SEs over the whole sample period. The conclusions are as follows: The outbreak of the pandemic makes the market jumping behavior happen more frequently. The crude oil market always dominates in the inter-market jumping spillover relationship, and its jump SE to the coal and green energy stock markets has a “one-day lag” effect. When encountering the impact of risk events, there is a risk transfer effect between the crude oil market and the domestic coal stock market, and the domestic coal stock market plays a regulating and stabi-lizing role in the green energy stock market. These conclusions can help investors optimize their investment portfolios, and are also helpful for the country to promote the development of green finance.
文章引用:李苏彤, 王辉, 叶鹏. 国际原油、中国煤炭与绿色能源股票市场间的溢出效应研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2023, 13(6): 6530-6545. https://doi.org/10.12677/ORF.2023.136644

参考文献

[1] 张宇, 钱水土. 绿色金融理论: 一个文献综述[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2017(9): 86-91.
[2] 王昊. 绿色债券、绿色股票与其他主要资产联动性研究[J]. 北方经贸, 2022(3): 103-106.
[3] 刘庆富, 许友传. 中国外非同步期货交易市场之间的跳跃溢出行为: 基于风险事件的视角[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(4): 679-690.
[4] 隋建利, 杨庆伟. 国际大宗商品市场与中国金融市场间风险的传染测度与来源追溯[J]. 财经研究, 2021, 47(8): 139-154.
[5] 沈悦, 李朝前, 赵欣悦, 王晓霞. 重大风险事件下全球股票市场风险传染效应研究[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2023, 39(4): 82-99.
[6] Taylor, S.J. (1986) Modeling Financial Time Series. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 151-152.
[7] Bates, D.S. (1996) Jumps and Stochastic Volatility: Exchange Rate Processes Implicit in Deutsche Mark Options. The Review of Financial Studies, 9, 69-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Duffie, D., Pan, J. and Singleton, K. (2000) Transform Analysis and Asset Pricing for Affine Jump-Diffusions. Econometrica, 68, 1343-1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Eraker, B., Johannes, M. and Polson, N. (2003) The Impact of Jumps in Volatility and Returns. The Journal of Finance, 58, 1269-1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 刘庆富, 朱迪华, 周思泓. 恒生指数期货与现货市场之间的跳跃溢出行为研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2011, 25(1): 115-120.
[11] 曾昭法, 左杰. 沪港证券市场收益的跳跃与波动溢出关系研究——基于MCMC算法的SVCJ模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(S1): 334-340.
[12] 王苏生, 胡明柱, 李梓龙. 跳扩散条件下波动率风险溢价及影响因素研究——基于上证50 ETF期权市场的实证[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(10): 123-131.
[13] Pan, M.S. and Hsueh, L.P. (1998) Transmission of Stock Returns and Volatility between the U.S. and Japan: Evidence from the Stock Index Futures Markets. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 5, 211-225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Miyakoshi, T. and Jalolov, M. (2005) Money-Income Cau-sality Revisited in EGARCH: Spillovers of Monetary Policy to Asia from the US. Journal of Asian Economics, 16, 299-313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Conrad, C., Loch, K. and Rittler, D. (2014) On the Macroeconomic Determinants of Long-Term Volatilities and Correlations in U.S. Stock and Crude Oil Markets. Journal of Empirical Finance, 29, 26-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 甄峰, 陈丽. 离岸与在岸人民币汇率互动与风险溢出效应研究[J]. 金融监管研究, 2016(10): 1-22.
[17] 郭栋. 新能源金属的中心化演进——基于VAR-BEKK-GARCH模型的实证检验[J]. 金融监管研究, 2023(2): 94-114.
[18] Ignatieva, K., Rodrigues, P. and Seeger, N.J. (2009) Stochastic Volatility and Jumps: Exponentially Affine Yes or No? An Empirical Analysis of S&P500 Dynamics. SSRN Electronic Journal. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 张振利, 彭柳, 李香秋. 原油市场与股市联动性分析——基于主板市场、创业板、中小板数据分析[J]. 黑龙江金融, 2022(11): 14-18.
[20] Li, X.P., Zhou, C.Y. and Wu, C.F. (2017) Jump Spillover between Oil Prices and Exchange Rates. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 486, 656-667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 杨杰, 李辉. 中国金融市场间的风险传染测度与来源追溯[J]. 开发性金融研究, 2023(1): 19-30.
[22] 潘群星, 孙羽佳, 高天晴, 杜修立. 中美股市跳跃溢出效应及跳跃对未来波动的影响研究[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2023(1): 12-24.
[23] 张浩, 韩铭辉, 姚佳颖. 外汇市场、股票市场与房地产市场的风险传染研究——基于三元VAR-BEKK-GARCH模型实证分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(7): 206-213.
[24] 李碧芳, 郭驰. 国际原油价格对我国股票市场的影响研究——以布伦特原油市场为例[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2012(5): 62-63.