泛癌中FXYD3预后和免疫浸润分析
Prognostic and Immune Infiltration Analysis of FXYD3 in Pan-Cancer
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.13122855, PDF,   
作者: 秦瑞泽, 王永华*:青岛大学附属医院泌尿外科,山东 青岛
关键词: FXYD3泛癌预后免疫浸润富集分析FXYD3 Pan-Cancer Prognosis Immune Infiltration Enrichment Analysis
摘要: FXYD3作为一种跨膜蛋白,具有离子通道或离子通道调节的作用。目前已有相关研究提示FXYD3与某些肿瘤关系密切。在这项研究中,我们旨在探索FXYD3在泛癌中的作用,从加州大学圣克鲁兹西纳分校(UCSC)和癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)下载数据,分别对TCGA_GTEx、TCGA和TCGA配对样本中FXYD3的表达进行研究。随后,我们对TCGA数据库中肿瘤进行Kaplan-Meier分析,并对FXYD3影响预后的肿瘤进行临床相关性分析和单因素Cox回归分析。我们构建并评估膀胱尿路上皮癌(BLCA)、头颈鳞状细胞癌(HNSC)和肾透明细胞癌(KIRC)的列线图模型,以证明FXYD3在肿瘤中预测患者预后的价值。此外,我们证实FXYD3与免疫细胞浸润也有关系。通过功能富集分析,我们探索FXYD3相关基因参与的生物学功能及潜在信号通路。我们的研究发现FXYD3在多种肿瘤中存在差异表达,并与多种肿瘤的临床结局及免疫微环境相关,可能通过P53信号通路及免疫相关通路影响肿瘤的发生发展。总之,我们认为FXYD3可以作为潜在的预后生物标志物和有效的癌症免疫治疗靶点。
Abstract: FXYD3, as a transmembrane protein, has a role in ion channel or ion channel regulation. There have been studies suggesting that FXYD3 is closely related to certain tumors. In this study, we aimed to explore the role of FXYD3 in pan-cancer by downloading data from the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) Xena and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to investigate the expression of FXYD3 in TCGA_GTEx, TCGA and TCGA paired samples, respectively. Subsequently, we performed Kaplan-Meier analyses of tumors in the TCGA database and performed clinical correlation and uni-variate Cox regression analyses of tumors in which FXYD3 affected prognosis. We constructed and evaluated nomogram models for bladder uroepithelial carcinoma (BLCA), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), and renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) to demonstrate the value of FXYD3 in tumors for predicting patient prognosis. In addition, we confirmed that FXYD3 was also associated with immune cell infiltration. Through functional enrichment analysis, we explored the biological functions and potential signaling pathways involved in FXYD3-related genes. Our study revealed that FXYD3 was differentially expressed in a variety of tumors and correlated with the clinical out-come and immune microenvironment of a variety of tumors, and may influence tumor development through the P53 signaling pathway and immune-related pathways. In conclusion, we believe that FXYD3 can be used as a potential prognostic biomarker and an effective target for cancer immuno-therapy.
文章引用:秦瑞泽, 王永华. 泛癌中FXYD3预后和免疫浸润分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(12): 20278-20290. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.13122855

参考文献

[1] 陈万青, 李霓, 石菊芳, 等. 中国城市癌症早诊早治项目进展[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2019, 28(1): 23-25.
[2] 邹小农, 贾漫漫, 王鑫, 等. 《2020全球癌症报告》要点解读[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2021, 28(1): 11-18.
[3] 艾超, 冀召帅, 唐蕾, 等. PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂抗肿瘤临床研究进展[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2021, 19(9): 8-13.
[4] Lee, Y.T., Tan, Y.J. and Oon, C.E. (2018) Molecular Targeted Therapy: Treating Cancer with Specificity. European Journal of Pharmacology, 834, 188-196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Morrison, B.W. and Leder, P. (1994) Neu and Ras Initiate Murine Mammary Tumors That Share Genetic Markers Generally Absent in c-myc and int-2-Initiated Tumors. Oncogene, 9, 3417-3426.
[6] 史海达, 史宪杰. FXYD3蛋白与肿瘤的相关性研究进展[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2017, 17(34): 62-63.
[7] 马学玲, 蔡海瑜, 车艳红, 等. FXYD3在宫颈鳞癌患者组织中的表达及与临床病理参数的关系[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2021, 39(9): 662-667.
[8] 白日兰, 崔久嵬. 从肿瘤免疫微环境角度看免疫治疗疗效预测标志物[J]. 中国癌症防治杂志, 2022, 13(6): 585-593.
[9] 李伟栋, 杨丽, 邹兴文, 等. 基于列线图的肿瘤风险预测及其效果评价[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2019, 32(4): 305-310.
[10] 耿辉, 田国祥, 王亚军, 等.肿瘤浸润性免疫细胞分析数据库TIMER2.0的应用介绍[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2020, 12(11): 1283-1286.
[11] Yu, G., Wang, L.G., Han, Y. and He, Q.Y. (2012) clusterProfiler: An R Package for Comparing Bio-logical Themes among Gene Clusters. Omics: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 16, 284-287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Lokshin, A., Bast, R.C. and Rodland, K. (2021) Circulating Cancer Biomarkers. Cancers (Basel), 13, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] 张百红, 岳红云. 免疫微环境促进肿瘤发生发展的机制研究进展[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2015, 23(6): 862-864.
[14] 张赟, 王小凡. 肿瘤微环境调控癌症发生发展的研究概述[J]. 生命科学, 2022, 52(9): 1377-1390.
[15] 赵喆, 白桦, 王志杰, 段建春, 等. 肿瘤微环境与免疫治疗耐药的关系及应对[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2020, 28(22): 3985-3989.