碳税政策下考虑航运竞争的碳减排投资决策研究
Research on Emission Reduction Investment Considering Shipping Competition under Carbon Tax Policy
DOI: 10.12677/MSE.2024.131016, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 杨宜清, 徐 琪：东华大学旭日工商管理学院，上海
关键词: 减排投资；碳排放；碳税；竞争供应链；Carbon Reduction Investment； Carbon Emission； Carbontax； Supply Chain Competition
摘要: 碳税政策下航运企业承担随之带来的碳排放成本，从而不得不考虑投资碳减排技术降低企业碳排放，然而如何在航运企业存在竞争的情形下进行投资决策成为亟待解决的问题。以此为背景，构建一个港口与两个航运企业组成的港航供应链。分析对比无企业投资、单一企业投资、两企业投资三种情形下港航供应链成员定价和利润以及碳排放总量的变化情况。结果表明单一企业投资情形下航运企业谁投资则谁受益，两企业均投资时在某些条件下则会导致两航运企业的利润甚至低于无企业投资下的利润，同时在受到竞争环境的影响，单一投资情形下碳减排水平高于两企业投资时的减排水平。研究还发现不同竞争强度下，碳税对于不同情形下的航运企业利润的影响有所不同。
Abstract: Under the carbon tax policy, shipping companies have to bear the carbon emission costs, which force them to consider investing in carbon reduction technologies to lower their carbon emissions. However, making investment decisions in the presence of competition among shipping companies remains a challenging problem. To address this issue, a port and two shipping companies are constructed to form a port-shipping supply chain. The changes in pricing, profits, and total carbon emissions of the members in the port-shipping supply chain are analyzed and compared under three scenarios: no company investment, single company investment, and investment by both companies. The results indicate that in the case of a single company investment, the company that invests benefits, while in some conditions, both shipping companies’ profits may even be lower than those without any company investment when both companies invest. Moreover, under the influence of competitive environment, the level of carbon emission reduction is higher in the scenario of a single company investment compared to when both companies invest. The study also finds that the impact of carbon tax on shipping companies’ profits varies under different levels of competition intensity.
文章引用：杨宜清, 徐琪. 碳税政策下考虑航运竞争的碳减排投资决策研究[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2024, 13(1): 168-184. https://doi.org/10.12677/MSE.2024.131016

参考文献

[1] Heitmann, N. and Peterson, S. (2014) The Potential Contribution of the Shipping Sector to an Efficient Reduction of Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Environmental Science & Policy, 42, 56-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] 黄有方, 魏明晖, 王煜, 等. “双碳”目标导向下我国绿色航运物流发展现状与趋势[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2023, 49(1): 1-16.
[3] 曹细玉, 张杰芳. 碳减排补贴与碳税下的供应链碳减排决策优化与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(4): 57-61.
[4] Pigou, A.C. (1924) The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan, New York.
[5] Lee, T.C., Chang, Y.T. and Lee, P.T.W. (2013) Economy-Wide Impact Analysis of a Carbon Tax on International Container Shipping. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 58, 87-102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] 周艳菊, 胡凤英, 周正龙. 碳税政策下制造商竞争的供应链定价策略和社会福利研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 94-105.
[7] 刘家国, 孔玉丹, 镇璐. 考虑双均衡的港航供应链可持续投资研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 142-153.
[8] Cui, H. and Notteboom, T. (2017) Modelling Emission Control Taxes in Port Areas and Port Privatization Levels in Port Competition and Co-Operation Sub-Games. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 56, 110-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Tiwari, S., Wee, H.M., Zhou, Y.J. and Tjoeng, L. (2021) Freight Consolidation and Containerization Strategy under Business as Usual Scenario & Carbon Tax Regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, Article ID: 123270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Liu, Y., Xin, X., Yang, Z., et al. (2021) Liner Shipping Network—Transaction Mechanism Joint Design Model Considering Carbon Tax and Liner Alliance. Ocean & Coastal Management, 212, Article ID: 105817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Ma, W.H., Han, Y.Y., Tang, H., et al. (2023) Ship Route Planning Based on Intelligent Mapping Swarm Optimization. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 176, Article ID: 108920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Wang, C.X. and Xu, C.Y. (2015) Sailing Speed Optimization in Voyage Chartering Ship Considering Different Carbon Emissions Taxation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 89, 108-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Gao, S.Q., Xin, X., Li, C., et al. (2022) Container Ocean Shipping Network Design Considering Carbon Tax and Choice Inertia of Cargo Owners. Ocean & Coastal Management, 216, Article ID: 105986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Xu, L.L., Chen, Y.Y. and Lee, S.H. (2022) Emission Tax and Strategic Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility in a Cournot-Bertrand Comparison. Energy Economics, 107, Article ID: 105846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] Wang, J., Huang, Q., Lin, X.D. and Yu, M.Z. (2021) Container Terminal Competition and Cooperation Considering Emission Tax. Maritime Policy & Management, 49, 930-953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[16] Teng, Z.Q., Li, X.L., Fang, Y.T. and Fu, H.L. (2021) Will Port Integration Help Reduce Carbon Emissions and Improve Social Welfare? Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, Article ID: 5208046.
[17] 桑高峰, 孟燕萍. 碳税政策下港口与船舶减排决策的博弈分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(21): 227-235.
[18] 周海英, 李伯棠. 碳税与客户低碳偏好下港航企业减排决策分析[J]. 中国航海, 2022, 45(3): 72-79.
[19] 梁晶, 张霖, 刘禹轩. 考虑碳排放政策的港航企业减排策略研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2023, 23(1): 39-47.
[20] Meng, L.P., Wang, J.M., Yan, W., et al. (2022) A Differential Game Model for Emission Reduction Decisions between Ports and Shipping Enterprises Considering Environmental Regulations. Ocean & Coastal Management, 225, Article ID: 106221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] 王伶俐, 汪传旭, 程琴. 考虑政府补贴和货主低碳偏好的船公司减排决策[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 88-95.
[22] 周海英, 张文静. 绿色港口建设下港口与船舶减排决策研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(7): 205-214.
[23] 周海英, 邓燕赟. “双碳”目标下的岸电减排决策研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(11): 229-235.
[24] Wang, C.X., Jiao, Y. and Peng, J.Y. (2023) Shipping Company’s Choice of Shore Power or Low Sulfur Fuel Oil under Different Power Structures of Maritime Supply Chain. Maritime Policy & Management. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Yang, L., Cai, Y.J., Wei, Y.L., et al. (2019) Choice of Technology for Emission Control in Port Areas: A Supply Chain Perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, Article ID: 118105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Madani, S.R. and Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2017) Sustainable Supply Chain Management with Pricing, Greening and Governmental Tariffs Determining Strategies: A Game-Theoretic Approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 287-298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] 邓万江, 马士华, 关旭. 碳交易背景下存在顾客环保偏好的双企业竞争策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(12): 17-26.
[28] Ma, P., Wang, H.Y. and Shang, J. (2013) Contract Design for Two-Stage Supply Chain Coordination: Integrating Manufacturer-Quality and Retailer-Marketing Efforts. International Journal of Production Economics, 146, 745-755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[29] 刘家国, 赵慧达, 李健. 基于绿色投资效率的港航供应链投资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 33-44.
[30] 周艳菊, 黄雨晴, 陈晓红, 等. 促进低碳产品需求的供应链减排成本分担模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(7): 85-93.
[31] 王珊珊, 张李浩, 范体军. 基于碳减排技术的竞争供应链投资均衡策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 73-82.
[32] 刘名武, 吴开兰, 付红, 等. 消费者低碳偏好下零售商主导供应链减排合作与协调[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(12): 3109-3117.

为你推荐