毕达哥拉斯模糊环境下的选址决策评估
Evaluation of Site Selection Decision Based on Pythagorean Fuzzy Cloud
摘要: 选址决策是装备抢修行动的重要前提。为实现仿真条件下野战修理所的高效、科学选址,结合毕达哥拉斯模糊集(Pythagorean fuzzy sets, PFS)、云模型和TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)构建多准则决策方法框架。在决策过程中,为提高权重的客观性,提出基于博弈论的主客观组合赋权法;为降低决策过程中的随机性,结合毕达哥拉斯模糊集和云模型构建毕达哥拉斯模糊云;为准确度量方案的优劣性,提出基于TOPSIS的相似性度量方法。最后,以仿真条件下野战修理所的选址决策为研究对象验证毕达哥拉斯模糊云-TOPSIS评估框架的可靠性和鲁棒性。结果表明:针对五组仿真条件下野战修理所决策的评估结果,所提方法与层次分析法、云模型和TOPSIS法排序结果一致,验证了所提方法的可行性和科学性。
Abstract: Location decision is an important premise of equipment repair action. In order to realize efficient and scientific site selection of field repair shop under simulation conditions, Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFS), Cloud model and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) are combined to construct the framework of multi-criterion decision methods. In the decision-making process, in order to improve the objectivity of the weights, the subjective and objective combination weighting method based on game theory is proposed. In order to reduce the randomness in the de-cision-making process, the Pythagorean fuzzy cloud is constructed by combining the Pythagorean fuzzy set and cloud model. In order to accurately measure the advantages and disadvantages of the scheme, a similarity measurement method based on TOPSIS is proposed. Finally, the reliability and robustness of the Pythagorean fuzzy cloud-TOPSIS evaluation framework are verified by the field repair shop location decision under simulation conditions. The results show that the proposed method is consistent with the ranking results of AHP, cloud model and TOPSIS method for the eval-uation results of field repair shop decision under five sets of simulation conditions, which verifies the feasibility and scientificity of the proposed method.
文章引用:王海燕, 杜智颜. 毕达哥拉斯模糊环境下的选址决策评估[J]. 应用数学进展, 2024, 13(2): 672-683. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2024.132065

参考文献

[1] 周亚. 多属性决策中的TOPSIS法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2009.
[2] Yang, S., Pan, Y. and Zeng, S. (2022) Decision Making Framework Based Fermatean Fuzzy Integrated Weighted Distance and TOPSIS for Green Low-Carbon Port Evaluation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 114, 105048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Shukla, A., Agarwal, P., Rana, R.S., et al. (2017) Applica-tions of TOPSIS Algorithm on Various Manufacturing Processes: A Review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4, 5320-5329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Karim, R. and Karmaker, C.L. (2016) Machine Selec-tion by AHP and TOPSIS Methods. American Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4, 7-13.
[5] Dos Santos, B.M., Godoy, L.P. and Campos, L.M.S. (2019) Performance Evaluation of Green Suppliers Using Entropy-TOPSIS-F. Jour-nal of Cleaner Production, 207, 498-509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Nazim, M., Moham-mad, C.W., Sadiq, M. (2022) A Comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods to Software Require-ments Selection. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61, 10851-10870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Memari, A., Dargi, A., Jokar, M.R.A., et al. (2019) Sustainable Supplier Selection: A Multi-Criteria Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 9-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Li, S., Huang, Q., Hu, B., et al. (2023) Mining Method Optimiza-tion of Difficult-to-Mine Complicated Orebody Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets and TOPSIS Method. Sustainability, 15, 3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Prabhu, M., Abdullah, N.N., Ahmed, R.R., Nambirajan, T. and Pandiyan, S. (2020) Segmenting the Manufacturing Industries and Measuring the Performance: Using Interval-Valued Triangular Fuzzy TOPSIS Method. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 6, 591-606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Tiwari, A., Lohani, Q.D. and Muhuri, P.K. (2020) Inter-val-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Supplier Selection Problem. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Glasgow, 19-24 July 2020, 1-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Gao, K., Yang, C., Zhu, N. and Yang, Y. (2022) Analysis of Influencing Factors of Military Equipment Maintenance Ability Based on DEMATEL-ISM Model. 2nd International Conference on Applied Mathematics, Modelling, and Intelligent Computing (CAMMIC 2022), 12259, 781-787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 吴松涛, 蔺希杰, 樊俊宏, 等. 装备维修保障能力评估优化研究[J]. 军事运筹与评估, 2023, 38(1): 34-37.
[13] Tianci, Z. and Yongyong, W. (2023) Study on Equipment Support Capabil-ity Assessment Method Based on Neural Network. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2460, 012174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Sennaroglu, B. and Celebi, G.V. (2018) A Military Airport Location Selection by AHP Integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR Methods. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 160-173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 郭强, 成文举, 杨廷军, 等. 基于博弈论组合赋权的断层定量评价模型及应用[J]. 煤矿安全, 2023, 54(6): 199-206.
[16] Atanasov, K.T. (1999) Open Problems in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Theory. In: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 35. Physica, Heidelberg, 289-291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Yager, R.R. (2013) Pythagorean Fuzzy Subsets. 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/ NAFIPS), Edmonton, 24-28 June 2013, 57-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 李德毅, 孟海军, 史雪梅. 隶属云和隶属云发生器[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 1995, 32(6): 15-20.
[19] Liu, Z., Wang, X., Wang, W., et al. (2022) An Integrated TOPSIS-ORESTE-Based Decision-Making Framework for New Energy Investment Assessment with Cloud Model. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 41, 1-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Wang, X., et al. (2023) Investigating River Health across Mountain to Urban Transitions Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Cloud Technique under Uncertain Environment. Journal of Hydrology, 620, 129426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K., Hwang, C.L., et al. (1981) Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. In: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 186. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 58-191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef