基于改进RAO算法的永磁同步电机2-DOF PI参数整定
Optimum 2-DOF PI Controller Design in PMSM Using Improved RAO Algorithm
DOI: 10.12677/MOS.2024.132143, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 唐高铭, 简献忠*:上海理工大学光电信息与计算机工程学院,上海
关键词: 永磁同步电机二自由度控制参数整定RAO算法Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Two Degrees of Freedom Control Parameter Setting RAO Algorithm
摘要: 针对2-DOF PI控制器参数不易整定、RAO-1算法容易陷入局部解的缺点,本文提出一种用于永磁同步电机参数整定的改进RAO (LILRAO)算法。在RAO算法中引入透镜成像的反向学习策略应用于种群更新,避免了算法陷入局部最优;引入Tent混沌映射进行种群初始化,增强了算法全局搜索能力。在PMSM速度环中,使用2-DOF PI控制器代替传统PI控制器,提高系统跟随性和抗扰动特性;测试函数实验表明LILRAO算法的有效性;Simulink仿真表明LILRAO算法与2-DOF PI控制器相结合可以有效提高PMSM控制系统的跟随性能和抗扰动性。
Abstract: This paper presents an improved RAO algorithm, named LILRAO algorithm, to address the chal-lenges associated with difficult parameter tuning for the 2-DOF PI controller and the tendency of the RAO-1 algorithm to converge to local solutions. The proposed algorithm focuses on parameter tun-ing for a permanent magnet synchronous motor. To prevent the algorithm from being trapped in local optima, a reverse learning strategy based on lens imaging is introduced and integrated into the population update process of the RAO algorithm. Moreover, the Tent chaotic map is employed for population initialization, thereby enhancing the algorithm’s global search capability. In the PMSM speed loop, the traditional PI controller is replaced by the 2-DOF PI controller to enhance system tracking and disturbance rejection. Experimental results on test functions verify the effec-tiveness of the LILRAO algorithm, while Simulink simulations demonstrate that combining the LILRAO algorithm with the 2-DOF PI controller significantly improves the tracking performance and disturbance rejection of the PMSM control system.
文章引用:唐高铭, 简献忠. 基于改进RAO算法的永磁同步电机2-DOF PI参数整定[J]. 建模与仿真, 2024, 13(2): 1511-1522. https://doi.org/10.12677/MOS.2024.132143

参考文献

[1] Chai, S., Wang, L. and Rogers, E. (2013) A Cascade MPC Control Structure for a PMSM with Speed Ripple Minimization. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 60, 2978-2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Xu, Y., Parspour, N. and Vollmer, U. (2014) Torque Ripple Minimization Using online Estimation of the Stator Resistances with Con-sideration of Magnetic Saturation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61, 5105-5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 邵雪琳, 王亚君, 刘海辉, 等. 智能电机控制系统[J]. 电子世界, 2016(22): 89-90.
[4] Visioli, A. (2001) Tuning of PID Controllers with Fuzzy Logic. IEE Proceedings-Control Theory Ap-plications, 148, 1-8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Kumar, V., Gaur, P. and Mittal, A.P. (2014) ANN Based Self Tuned PID Like Adaptive Controller Design for High Performance PMSM Position Control. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 7995-8002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 张铸, 姜金美, 张小平. 改进灰狼优化算法的永磁同步电机多参数辨识[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2022, 26(10): 119-129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 石川东. 改进粒子群算法的永磁同步电机参数辨识[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 株洲: 湖南工业大学, 2022.[CrossRef
[8] 蔡琦盼. 基于改进混沌粒子群算法和灰狼算法的永磁同步电机参数辨识[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 赣州: 江西理工大学, 2022.[CrossRef
[9] Zuo, R., Xiong, X., et al. (2019) Design of PI Controller for PMSM Using Chaos Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 717, Article 012021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Liu, Z., Wei, H., Zhong, Q., et al. (2017) Parameter Estimation for VSI-Fed PMSM Based on a Dynamic PSO with Learning Strategies. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 32, 3154-3165.
[11] 李明, 程启明, 陈根, 等. 永磁同步伺服电机二自由度控制[J]. 电机与控制应用, 2014, 41(10): 3-7+27.
[12] Stînean, A.-I., Preitl, S., et al. (2012) 2-DOF PI(D) Takagi-Sugeno and Sliding Mode Controllers for BLDC Drives. 2012 15th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, Novi Sad, 4-6 September 2012, 1-6.
[13] 蔡豪, 汪亮亮. 二自由度PID在PMSM电流环中的应用[J]. 机电工程技术, 2017, 46(7): 26-28+143.
[14] Celik, H. and Yigit, T. (2018) Field-Oriented Control of the PMSM with 2-DOF PI Controller Tuned by Using PSO. 2018 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing, Malatya, 28-30 September 2018, 1-4.
[15] Rao, R.V. (2020) Rao Algorithms: Three Metaphor-Less Simple Algorithms for Solving Optimization Problems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 11, 107-130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef