ESG评级分歧对权益融资成本的影响研究
Research on the Impact of ESG Rating Divergence on Equity Financing Costs
DOI: 10.12677/orf.2024.143253, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 汪 莹:上海工程技术大学管理学院,上海
关键词: ESGESG评级分歧权益融资成本ESG ESG Ratings Divergence Equity Financing Costs
摘要: ESG (环境、社会责任、公司治理)评级在衡量企业社会责任方面具有重要性,然而不同评级机构对同一企业的ESG评级存在分歧。本文首次探讨了这种分歧对企业权益融资成本的潜在影响。通过对2011~2022年沪深A股上市企业ESG评级分歧和权益融资成本的分析发现,ESG评级分歧较大的公司承担着更高的权益融资成本。机制检验表明,信息不对称是ESG评级分歧加大企业权益融资成本的重要渠道。进一步研究发现,投资者情绪更高、市场化程度更高时,ESG评级分歧对权益融资成本的影响更加显著。这一结论在多项稳健性检验下得到确认,拓展了对权益融资成本影响因素的认知,填补了ESG评级分歧对权益融资成本影响的研究空白,为理解ESG评级对公司融资决策的潜在影响提供了新的视角。
Abstract: ESG (Environmental, Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance) ratings are important in measuring corporate social responsibility, but different rating agencies have different ESG ratings for the same company. This paper discusses for the first time the potential impact of this divergence on the cost of equity financing. Through the analysis of the ESG rating divergence and equity financing cost of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2022, it is found that the companies with large ESG rating divergence bear higher equity financing cost. The mechanism test shows that information asymmetry is an important channel for ESG rating divergence to increase the cost of equity financing. Further research shows that when investor sentiment is higher and the degree of marketization is higher, the impact of ESG rating divergence on equity financing costs is more significant. This conclusion has been confirmed by a number of robustness tests, expanding the cognition of the factors affecting the cost of equity financing, filling the research gap on the impact of ESG rating differences on the cost of equity financing, and providing a new perspective for understanding the potential impact of ESG rating on corporate financing decisions.
文章引用:汪莹. ESG评级分歧对权益融资成本的影响研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2024, 14(3): 147-158. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2024.143253

参考文献

[1] Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y. and Zhang, C. (2019) Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Management Science, 65, 4451-4469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Lins, K.V., Servaes, H. and Tamayo, A. (2017) Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72, 1785-1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Dahiya, M. and Singh, S. (2020) The Linkage between CSR and Cost of Equity: An Indian Perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 12, 499-521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Chatterji, A.K., Durand, R., Levine, D.I. and Touboul, S. (2015) Do Ratings of Firms Converge? Implications for Managers, Investors and Strategy Researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 1597-1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 袁蓉丽, 江纳, 刘梦瑶. ESG研究综述与展望[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(17): 128-134.
[6] Berg, F., Kölbel, J.F. and Rigobon, R. (2022) Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Review of Finance, 26, 1315-1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 何太明, 李亦普, 王峥, 等. ESG评级分歧提高了上市公司自愿性信息披露吗? [J]. 会计与经济研究, 2023, 37(3): 54-70.
[8] 周泽将, 谷文菁, 伞子瑶. ESG评级分歧与分析师盈余预测准确性[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(10): 164-176.
[9] Gibson Brandon, R., Krueger, P. and Schmidt, P.S. (2021) ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 77, 104-127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Serafeim, G. and Yoon, A. (2022) Stock Price Reactions to ESG News: The Role of ESG Ratings and Disagreement. Review of Accounting Studies, 28, 1500-1530.
[11] Billio, M., Costola, M., Hristova, I., Latino, C. and Pelizzon, L. (2021) Inside the ESG Ratings: (Dis)Agreement and Performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28, 1426-1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Stulz, R.M. (1995) Globalization of Capital Markets and the Cost of Capital: The Case of Nestlé. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 8, 30-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 程小可, 沈昊旻, 高升好. 贸易摩擦与权益资本成本[J]. 会计研究, 2021(2): 61-71.
[14] Hail, L. and Leuz, C. (2006) International Differences in the Cost of Equity Capital: Do Legal Institutions and Securities Regulation Matter? Journal of Accounting Research, 44, 485-531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 苏利平, 张慧敏. 政府监管、环境信息披露质量与股权融资成本[J]. 会计之友, 2020(23): 80-87.
[16] 庞家任, 张鹤, 张梦洁. 资本市场开放与股权资本成本——基于沪港通、深港通的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020(12): 169-188.
[17] 周冬华, 王晶. 客户集中度、产品市场竞争与股权融资成本[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2017, 39(7): 44-58.
[18] 花贵如, 周树理, 刘志远, 等. 产业政策、投资者情绪与企业资源配置效率[J]. 财经研究, 2021, 47(1): 77-93.
[19] Botosan, C.A. (1997) Disclosure Level and the Cost of Equity Capital. Accounting Review, 73, 323-349.
[20] 晏艳阳, 刘弢, 彭敏. 信息披露质量对股权融资成本的影响分析[J]. 证券市场导报, 2008(4): 23-33.
[21] 田利辉, 王可第. 社会责任信息披露的“掩饰效应”和上市公司崩盘风险——来自中国股票市场的DID-PSM分析[J]. 管理世界, 2017(11): 146-157.
[22] 叶康涛, 陆正飞. 中国上市公司股权融资成本影响因素分析[J]. 管理世界, 2004(5): 127-131, 142.
[23] Easley, D. and O’hara, M. (2004) Information and the Cost of Capital. The Journal of Finance, 59, 1553-1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Garfinkel, J.A. (2009) Measuring Investors’ Opinion Divergence. Journal of Accounting Research, 47, 1317-1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] 汪平, 袁光华, 李阳阳. 我国企业资本成本估算及其估算值的合理界域: 2000-2009 [J]. 投资研究, 2012, 31(11): 101-114.
[26] Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A. and Tarelli, A. (2022) Sustainable Investing with ESG Rating Uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145, 642-664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] 张云齐, 杨淏宇, 张笑语. ESG评级分歧与债务资本成本[J]. 金融评论, 2023, 15(4): 22-43, 124.
[28] 张庆, 朱迪星. 投资者情绪、管理层持股与企业实际投资——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014, 17(4): 120-127, 139.
[29] 徐寿福, 徐龙炳. 信息披露质量与资本市场估值偏误[J]. 会计研究, 2015(1): 42-49, 98.