HER2阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗联合双靶疗效的列线图预测模型建立
Establishment of a Nomogram Prediction Model for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Dual-Target Efficacy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2024.1461819, PDF,   
作者: 陈东旭, 李金洋, 丰竹慧, 吴 琍*:青岛大学附属医院乳腺病诊疗中心,山东 青岛
关键词: 乳腺癌HER2新辅助治疗pCR预测模型Breast Cancer HER2 Neoadjuvant Therapy pCR Prediction Model
摘要: 目的:研究HER2阳性乳腺癌接受新辅助化疗联合双靶治疗疗效的相关影响因素,同时建立预测模型,旨在提高患者新辅助治疗疗效预测的有效性和准确性,从而为临床诊疗方案的选择提供参考。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月1日~2022年12月31日接受新辅助化疗联合双靶并完成手术的146例HER2阳性乳腺癌患者的临床病理资料,根据MP分级系统和RCB系统分为pCR组和非pCR组。采用单因素Logistic回归,将有统计学意义和可能有临床意义的指标纳入LASSO回归。根据LASSO回归筛选出的变量以列线图形式构建预测模型,然后采用受试者工作特性曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve, ROC)评价模型的预测效能,使用校准曲线评价模型的准确性。采用DCA评价模型的临床应用价值。最后在验证集中对模型进行内部验证。结果:采用单因素Logistic筛选出了ER状态、PR状态、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)及四周期后RECIST1.1四个预测变量,将单因素分析中具有统计学意义的4个特征因素纳入到LASSO回归,根据LASSO分析结果,将具有统计学意义的自变量构建模型及列线图,训练集和验证集的ROC曲线下面积(area under curve, AUC)分别为0.853和0.741,内部验证显示列线图具有较好的预测能力。结论:ER状态、PR状态、NLR及四周期后RECIST1.1是影响HER2阳性乳腺癌患者接受新辅助治疗后达到pCR的独立预测因素。基于以上因素构建的列线图模型对新辅助治疗后pCR有较好的预测效能。
Abstract: Purpose: To study the factors influencing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with dual-target therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer, and to establish a prediction model, aiming to improve the effectiveness and accuracy of predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy in patients, thereby providing information for the selection of clinical diagnosis and treatment plans. Methods: Retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data of 146 HER2-positive breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with dual target and completed surgery from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022, and were divided into pCR group and non-pCR group according to the MP grading system and RCB system. Single-factor logistic regression was used, and indicators with statistical significance and possible clinical significance were included in LASSO regression. A prediction model was constructed in the form of a nomogram based on the variables selected by LASSO regression, and then the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the prediction performance of the model, and the calibration curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of the model. DCA was used to evaluate the clinical application value of the model. Finally, the model is internally validated in the validation set. Result: Single-factor Logistic regression was initially used to identify four predictive variables: ER status, PR status, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and RECIST1.1 after four cycles. The four significant factors from the single-factor analysis were then incorporated into LASSO regression. Based on the results of the LASSO analysis, statistically significant independent variables were used to construct predictive models and nomograms. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for the training set and validation set were 0.853 and 0.741, respectively. Internal validation demonstrated the nomogram’s strong predictive ability. Conclusion: ER, PR, NLR and RECIST1.1 after four cycles are independent predictive factors for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer to achieve pCR after neoadjuvant therapy. The nomogram model constructed based on the above factors has good predictive performance for pCR after neoadjuvant treatment.
文章引用:陈东旭, 李金洋, 丰竹慧, 吴琍. HER2阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗联合双靶疗效的列线图预测模型建立[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(6): 623-636. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.1461819

参考文献

[1] Barzaman, K., Karami, J., Zarei, Z., Hosseinzadeh, A., Kazemi, M.H., Moradi-Kalbolandi, S., et al. (2020) Breast Cancer: Biology, Biomarkers, and Treatments. International Immunopharmacology, 84, Article 106535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Shien, T. and Iwata, H. (2020) Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 50, 225-229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Li, Y., Li, S., Liu, J., Yang, X., et al. (2024) Natural Products and Derivatives for Breast Cancer Treatment: From Drug Discovery to Molecular Mechanism. Phytomedicine, 129, Article 155600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Carey, L.A. and Sharpless, N.E. (2011) Parp and Cancer—If It’s Broke, Don’t Fix It. New England Journal of Medicine, 364, 277-279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Boughey, J.C., McCall, L.M., Ballman, K.V., Mittendorf, E.A., Ahrendt, G.M., Wilke, L.G., et al. (2014) Tumor Biology Correlates with Rates of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Annals of Surgery, 260, 608-616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Takada, M. and Toi, M. (2020) Neoadjuvant Treatment for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Chinese Clinical Oncology, 9, 32-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Morrow, M. (2018) Management of the Node-Positive Axilla in Breast Cancer in 2017. JAMA Oncology, 4, 250-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Villacampa, G., Tung, N.M., Pernas, S., Paré, L., Bueno-Muiño, C., Echavarría, I., et al. (2023) Association of HER2DX with Pathological Complete Response and Survival Outcomes in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Annals of Oncology, 34, 783-795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Cheng, Y., Xiang, H., Xin, L., Duan, X. and Liu, Y. (2022) Neoadjuvant Therapy for Early Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Positive Breast Cancer in China: A Multicenter Real-World Study (CSBrS-015). Chinese Medical Journal, 135, 2311-2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Zhou, M., Wang, S., Wan, N., Yuan, S., Hu, X., Zhou, W., et al. (2022) Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Pertuzumab Plus Trastuzumab in Combination with Chemotherapy Regimen in Chinese Patients with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Multi-Center Cohort Study. Annals of Translational Medicine, 10, 1387-1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Eisenhauer, E.A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L.H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., et al. (2009) New Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours: Revised Recist Guideline (Version 1.1). European Journal of Cancer, 45, 228-247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Choi, W.J., Kim, H.H., Cha, J.H., Shin, H.J. and Chae, E.Y. (2019) Comparison of Pathologic Response Evaluation Systems after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancers: Correlation with Computer-Aided Diagnosis of MRI Features. American Journal of Roentgenology, 213, 944-952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] You, C., Li, J., Zhi, W., Chen, Y., Yang, W., Gu, Y., et al. (2019) The Volumetric-Tumour Histogram-Based Analysis of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Non-Gaussian Diffusion MRI: Association with Prognostic Factors in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Journal of Translational Medicine, 17, Article No. 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Negrão, E.M.S., Souza, J.A., Marques, E.F. and Bitencourt, A.G.V. (2019) Breast Cancer Phenotype Influences MRI Response Evaluation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. European Journal of Radiology, 120, Article 108701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Zhang, X., Wang, D., Liu, Z., Wang, Z., Li, Q., Xu, H., et al. (2020) The Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 10, 197-210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Chen, S., Liang, Y., Feng, Z. and Wang, M. (2019) Efficacy and Safety of HER2 Inhibitors in Combination with or without Pertuzumab for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Cancer, 19, Article No. 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Nahta, R., Hung, M. and Esteva, F.J. (2004) The Her-2-Targeting Antibodies Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab Synergistically Inhibit the Survival of Breast Cancer Cells. Cancer Research, 64, 2343-2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Guthrie, G.J.K., Charles, K.A., Roxburgh, C.S.D., Horgan, P.G., McMillan, D.C. and Clarke, S.J. (2013) The Systemic Inflammation-Based Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio: Experience in Patients with Cancer. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 88, 218-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Noh, H., Eomm, M. and Han, A. (2013) Usefulness of Pretreatment Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Disease-Specific Survival in Breast Cancer Patients. Journal of Breast Cancer, 16, 55-59.
[20] Ding, N., Huang, J., Li, N., Yuan, J., Wang, S. and Xiao, Z. (2020) Roles of Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio in Prognosis and in Differentiation of Potential Beneficiaries in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer with Trastuzumab Therapy. BMC Cancer, 20, Article No. 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Ulas, A., Avci, N., Kos, T., Cubukcu, E., Olmez, O.F., Bulut, N. and Degirmenci, M. (2015) Are Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio Associated with Prognosis in Patients with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Trastuzumab? Journal of B.U.ON., 20, 714-722.
[22] Ding, N., Pang, J., Liu, X., He, X., Zhou, W., Xie, H., et al. (2024) Prognostic Value of Baseline Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of Data from the Cleopatra Trial. Breast Cancer Research, 26, Article No. 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Litton, J.K., Gonzalez-Angulo, A.M., Warneke, C.L., Buzdar, A.U., Kau, S., Bondy, M., et al. (2008) Relationship between Obesity and Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy among Women with Operable Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 4072-4077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Krystel-Whittemore, M., Xu, J., Brogi, E., Ventura, K., Patil, S., Ross, D.S., et al. (2019) Pathologic Complete Response Rate According to HER2 Detection Methods in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 177, 61-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Wang, Y., Singh, K., Dizon, D., Graves, T., Amin, A. and Yakirevich, E. (2021) Immunohistochemical HER2 Score Correlates with Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Primary Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 186, 667-676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Sánchez-Muñoz, A., Navarro-Perez, V., Plata-Fernández, Y., Santonja, A., Moreno, I., Ribelles, N., et al. (2015) Proliferation Determined by Ki-67 Defines Different Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab-Based Chemotherapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer, 15, 343-347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Kurozumi, S., Inoue, K., Takei, H., Matsumoto, H., Kurosumi, M., Horiguchi, J., et al. (2015) ER, PgR, Ki67, P27kip1, and Histological Grade as Predictors of Pathological Complete Response in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Taxanes Followed by Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide Concomitant with Trastuzumab. BMC Cancer, 15, Article No. 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]