宿州矿区碎软煤渗透性特征研究
The Permeability Characteristics of Broken Soft Coal in Suzhou Mining Area
DOI: 10.12677/ag.2024.146068, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 夏雄飞:中联煤层气有限责任公司,北京;陈 松:宿州学院资源与土木工程学院,安徽 宿州
关键词: 宿州矿区碎软煤渗透率损害系数 Suzhou Mining Area BSC Permeability Damage Coefficient
摘要: 采集宿州矿区碎软煤与原生结构煤,利用PDP-200渗透率测试仪,结合扫描电子显微镜和孔隙度测试仪(QKX-II),研究了宿州矿区碎软煤的渗透性特征。研究表明:宿州矿区碎软煤构造裂隙较为发育,渗透率较大,其中碎斑煤的初始渗透率最大;在煤体变形序列中,随着煤体构造变形强度的增大,孔隙度和渗透率大体呈增大趋势;碎软煤的有效应力与渗透率呈负指数关系(R2 = 0.92~0.99),随着有效应力的增大,碎软煤的渗透率呈减小趋势;不同变形程度的碎软煤,其渗透率损害系数和无因次渗透率都随着有效应力的增大而减小,其中碎斑煤的损害系数和碎裂煤的无因次渗透率变化随有效应力的增大,变化最大,表明强脆性变形煤(碎斑煤)压力敏感性大,弱脆性变形煤(碎裂煤)压力敏感性小;煤样降压之后,煤体渗透率呈增长趋势,其中碎斑煤降压前后渗透率变化最大,碎裂煤次之,片状煤最小。
Abstract: The permeability characteristics of broken soft coal (BSC) in Suzhou mining area were studied by using the PDP-200 permeability tester, the scanning electron microscope and the porosity tester (QKX-II). The results show that the fractures of BSC in Suzhou mining area are relatively developed, and the permeability of BSC is large, among which the initial permeability of mortar coal is the largest. The porosity and the permeability of BSC tend to increase with the increase of structural coal deformation strength. There is a negative exponential relationship between the effective stress and the permeability of BSC (R2 = 0.92~0.99), and the permeability of BSC decreases with the increase of the effective stress. The damage coefficient and dimensionless permeability of different types BSC decrease with the increase of effective stress, among which the damage coefficient of mortar coal and the dimensionless permeability of cataclastic coal undergo significant changes with the increase of effective stress. These indicate that coal with strong brittle deformation is more sensitive to pressure, while coal with weak brittle deformation is less sensitive to pressure. During depressurization, the permeability of coal shows an increasing trend, of which the change of permeability of mortar coal before and after depressurization is the largest, followed by cataclastic coal, and flaky coal is the smallest.
文章引用:夏雄飞, 陈松. 宿州矿区碎软煤渗透性特征研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2024, 14(6): 733-742. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2024.146068

参考文献

[1] 姜波, 李明, 宋昱, 等. 构造煤及其瓦斯地质意义[M]. 南京: 科学出版社, 2020.
[2] 桑树勋, 皇凡生, 单衍胜, 等. 碎软低渗煤储层强化与煤层气地面开发技术进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2024, 52(1): 196-210.
[3] 姜波, 秦勇, 琚宜文, 等. 构造煤化学结构演化与瓦斯特性耦合机理[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(2): 262-271.
[4] 姜波, 李明, 程国玺, 李凤丽. 矿井构造预测及其在瓦斯突出评价中的意义[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(8): 2306-2317.
[5] 郭德勇, 揣筱升, 张建国, 等. 构造应力场对煤与瓦斯突出的控制作用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(8): 3076-3090.
[6] Konecny, P. and Kozusnikova, A. (2011) Influence of Stress on the Permeability of Coal and Sedimentary Rocks of the Upper Silesian Basin. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 48, 347-352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Jasinge, D., Ranjith, P.G. and Choi, S.K. (2011) Effects of Effective Stress Changes on Permeability of Latrobe Valley Brown Coal. Fuel, 90, 1292-1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 许江, 张丹丹, 彭守建, 等. 三轴应力条件下温度对原煤渗流特性影响的实验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(9): 1848-1854.
[9] 胡雄, 梁为, 侯厶靖, 等. 温度与应力对原煤、型煤渗透特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(6): 1222-1229.
[10] 傅雪海, 李大华, 秦勇, 等. 煤基质收缩对渗透率影响的实验研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2002, 31(2): 129-131, 137.
[11] Cheng, G., Jiang, B., Li, M., Li, F. and Song, Y. (2020) Effects of Pore-Fracture Structure of Ductile Tectonically Deformed Coals on Their Permeability: An Experimental Study Based on Raw Coal Cores. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 193, Article ID: 107371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 王相龙, 潘结南, 王凯, 等. 微米CT扫描尺度下构造煤微裂隙结构特征及其对渗透性的控制[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(3): 1325-1334.
[13] Brace, W.F. (1978) A Note on Permeability Changes in Geologic Material Due to Stress. Pure and Applied Geophysics Pageoph, 116, 627-633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] McKee, C.R., Bumb, A.C. and Koenig, R.A. (1988) Stress-Dependent Permeability and Porosity of Coal. In: Fassett, J.E., Ed., Geology and Coal-Bed Methane Resources of the Northern San Juan Basin, Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists Guidebook, Colorado, 143-153.
[15] Enever, J.R.E. and Henning, A. (1997) The Relationship between Permeability and Effective Stress for Australian Coal and Its Implications with Respect to Coalbed Methane Exploration and Reservoir Model. Proceedings of the 1997 International Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, 12-17 May 1997, 13-22.
[16] Li, H., Shimada, S. and Zhang, M. (2004) Anisotropy of Gas Permeability Associated with Cleat Pattern in a Coal Seam of the Kushiro Coalfield in Japan. Environmental Geology, 47, 45-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Gentzis, T., Deisman, N. and Chalaturnyk, R.J. (2007) Geomechanical Properties and Permeability of Coals from the Foothills and Mountain Regions of Western Canada. International Journal of Coal Geology, 69, 153-164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 宋昱. 低中阶构造煤纳米孔及大分子结构演化机理[D]: [博士学位论文]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.
[19] Zheng, L., Liu, G., Wang, L. and Chou, C. (2008) Composition and Quality of Coals in the Huaibei Coalfield, Anhui, China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 97, 59-68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 么玉鹏. 脆性变形系列构造煤物性特征及其结构定量表征[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2017.
[21] 李传亮, 孔祥言, 徐献芝, 等. 多孔介质的双重有效应力[J]. 自然杂志, 1999, 21(5): 288-292.
[22] 孟召平, 侯泉林. 煤储层应力敏感性及影响因素的试验[J]. 煤炭学报, 2012, 37(3): 430-436.