异质信念下企业动态投资策略研究
Research on Dynamic Investment Strategies of Enterprises under Heterogeneous Beliefs
DOI: 10.12677/orf.2024.143327, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 杨吉丽, 张 勇*, 宋思敏, 冯 洁:吉首大学数学与统计学院,湖南 吉首
关键词: 异质信念时间偏好不一致模糊厌恶投资策略Heterogeneous Beliefs Inconsistent Time Preference Ambiguity Aversion Investment Strategy
摘要: 从行为金融角度出发,引入企业决策者的时间偏好不一致和模糊厌恶特质,采用实物期权和最优控制方法,构建异质信念下的企业动态投资模型,探讨决策者的异质信念对企业最优破产水平与投资决策的影响。数值分析表明:时间偏好一致的企业决策者更看好企业未来发展,其最优破产水平较低。其次,当决策者存在模糊厌恶特质时,由于风险资产收益的不确定性使决策者在决策过程中更加谨慎,企业破产阈值会更高。最后,企业决策者的时间偏好不一致程度越大,他们更倾向于延时投资,通过较高的现金流来弥补投资成本和风险。并且模糊厌恶特质使决策者更倾向于规避风险,减少企业的投资水平,从而加剧了投资不足的情况。本文从一个新的视角研究金融问题,有助于提升企业投资效率和企业价值,为企业经营决策提供理论依据。
Abstract: From the perspective of behavioral finance, the inconsistent time preference and fuzzy aversion traits of corporate decision makers are introduced, and real options and optimal control methods are used to construct a dynamic investment model of corporations under heterogeneous beliefs, and to explore the impact of heterogeneous beliefs of decision makers on the optimal bankruptcy level and investment decisions of corporations. Numerical analysis shows that corporate decision makers with consistent time preference are more optimistic about the future development of the enterprise, and their optimal bankruptcy level is lower. Second, when the decision maker has a fuzzy aversion trait, the corporate bankruptcy threshold is higher due to the uncertainty of risky asset returns that makes the decision maker more cautious in the decision making process. Finally, the greater the degree of inconsistency in the time preference of the firm’s decision makers, the more they prefer delayed investment to compensate for investment costs and risks through higher cash flows. In addition, the ambiguity aversion trait exacerbates underinvestment by making decision makers more risk-averse and reducing the level of investment in the firm. This paper studies financial issues from a new perspective, which helps to enhance corporate investment efficiency and corporate value, and provides a theoretical basis for corporate business decisions.
文章引用:杨吉丽, 张勇, 宋思敏, 冯洁. 异质信念下企业动态投资策略研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2024, 14(3): 914-922. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2024.143327

参考文献

[1] 蔡洪文, 张旭辉, 朱波强. 卖方理性下的异质主观信念与资产定价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(S1): 302-309.
[2] Strotz, R.H. (1973) Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. Macmillan Education. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 秦川, 陈加奎, 宗传磊. 中国证券投资基金对股票流动性影响的统计检验[J]. 统计与决策, 2010(15): 154-156.
[4] 祝小全, 陈卓. 隐性杠杆约束、流动性风险和投资者情绪[J]. 金融研究, 2021(10): 171-189.
[5] 林敏华. 信贷资产证券化、异质性投资者和金融风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6): 25-31.
[6] 张勇, 罗鹏飞, 杨招军. 时间偏好不一致下的资产证券化最优合约设计与决策[J]. 系统管理学报, 2019, 28(1): 108-115.
[7] Li, Y., Guo, J., Sun, S. and Li, Y. (2022) How Time-Inconsistent Preferences Influence Venture Capital Exit Decisions? A New Perspective for Grandstanding. Financial Innovation, 8, Article No. 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 张铁铸, 李坚, 李彤彤. 基于时间偏好不一致的最优关系租金与银企估值[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2023, 38(3): 86-97.
[9] 罗鹏飞, 段依竺, 张勇. 时间偏好不一致企业家动态投资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 54-63.
[10] 罗鹏飞, 陆婷. 流动性偏好企业家动态投资消费与企业资产定价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(2): 1-8.
[11] Knight, F.H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflin.
[12] Füllbrunn, S., Rau, H.A. and Weitzel, U. (2014) Does Ambiguity Aversion Survive in Experimental Asset Markets? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 107, 810-826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Alonso, I. and Prado, M. (2015) Ambiguity Aversion, Asset Prices, and the Welfare Costs of Aggregate Fluctuations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 51, 78-92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 詹泽雄, 吴宗法. 心理账户、损失厌恶与行为资产配置实证研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(8): 177-184.
[15] Kast, R., Lapied, A. and Roubaud, D. (2010) Real Options under Ambiguity: The Case for Choquet-Brownian Motions. Unpublished Manuscript.
[16] Merton, R.C. (1971) Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Model. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 374-413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef