平台经济中垄断行为的刑法规制研究
Research on the Criminal Law Regulation of Monopoly Behavior in Platform Economy
摘要: 平台经济垄断行为呈现出与传统市场竞争模式截然不同的竞争特征,这对以反垄断法为基础的市场竞争法治提出了严峻的挑战。目前,我国法律仅依靠行政和民事手段来规范垄断行为,这在实现利益平衡和风险规避方面存在诸多困难。平台经济下的反垄断不在于要不要刑法规制,而在于如何刑法规制,科学厘定刑法介入边界问题。对平台经济下的垄断行为进行刑法规制,其正当性要从法律秩序统一原理和刑法的谦抑性两方面考量。在明确垄断行为有限入罪的适用范围的前提下,即通过主体间视域融合在类型化的刑法边界构造体系中发现而不是发明刑法边界,创设而不是创造刑法边界。以范围性边界、内容性边界以及刑罚设置边界三者为中心,建构一个体系化的反垄断刑法规制体系,在刑法边界的类型化构建体系中实现对垄断行为的刑法边界创设。
Abstract: The monopoly behavior of the platform economy presents the characteristics of competition completely different from the traditional market competition mode, which poses a severe challenge to the market competition rule of law based on the anti-monopoly law. At present, our law only relies on administrative and civil means to regulate monopoly behavior, which has many difficulties in realizing interest balance and risk avoidance. Anti-monopoly under the platform economy is not about whether to regulate criminal law, but how to regulate criminal law, and scientifically determine the boundary of criminal law intervention. To regulate monopoly behavior under platform economy, its legitimacy should be considered from two aspects: the principle of unity of legal order and the modesty of criminal law. Under the premise of clarifying the scope of application of the limited crime of monopoly behavior, the criminal law boundary is discovered rather than invented, and the criminal law boundary is created rather than created in the typed criminal law boundary construction system through the integration of inter-subject perspective. Centering on scope boundary, content boundary and penalty setting boundary, a systematic anti-monopoly criminal law regulation system is constructed, and the criminal law boundary of monopoly behavior is created in the typed construction system of criminal law boundary.
文章引用:胡绍洋. 平台经济中垄断行为的刑法规制研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(3): 6098-6103. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.133752

参考文献

[1] 杨昊堃. 平台经济反垄断的刑法规制研究[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2024, 45(1): 196-199.
[2] 王群. 刑法对互联网平台垄断行为的介入及其边界——兼论新《反垄断法》中刑事责任条款设置的正当性[J]. 金融与经济, 2023(5): 36-45.
[3] 黄俊杰. 平台经济反垄断的刑事规制与检察综合治理[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2023(2): 107-125.
[4] 张晨颖. 垄断行为刑事化的基础及其构造[J]. 法学评论, 2023, 41(5): 103-113.
[5] 曾凡宇, 张锋, 程衍. 论我国反垄断刑事责任制度的构建[J]. 北京交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 22(2): 125-132.
[6] 胡学相, 尹晓闻. 垄断行为刑法规制的法理分析[J]. 广东社会科学, 2016(2): 249-256.
[7] 刘乃梁, 叶鑫. 反垄断刑事责任: 入罪理据与实现进路[J]. 竞争政策研究, 2023(1): 43-53.
[8] 王群. 刑法介入互联网平台垄断行为再审思: 逻辑、边界与落地——对反垄断法中刑事责任条款的理解与适用[J/OL]. 长白学刊, 2024: 1-11.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1009.D.20240325.1408.002.html, 2024-03-28.
[9] 彭瑞楠, 丁国峰. 中国垄断行为刑事立法完善对策研究[J]. 安徽警官职业学院学报, 2023, 22(4): 43-49+68.
[10] 金善明. 论垄断行为入罪化的限度[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 17(6): 68-74.
[11] 马志萍. 垄断行为犯罪化问题研究[J]. 刑法论丛, 2014, 38(2): 228-241.
[12] 蒋岩波, 黄娟. 卡特尔行为反垄断法与刑法的协同规制[J]. 江西社会科学, 2020, 40(10): 190-198.