企业ESG表现对融资效率的影响研究
Research on the Impact of Enterprise ESG Performance on Financing Efficiency
DOI: 10.12677/jlce.2024.133017, PDF,   
作者: 徐晓伟：北方工业大学经济管理学院，北京
关键词: ESG表现；融资效率；面板回归；ESG Performance； Financing Efficiency； Panel Regression
摘要: 随着经济发展方式的转变，大力发展绿色产业成为我国经济发展新的增长点，企业ESG表现愈来愈成为评价企业能否稳定发展的重要关键指标，而在责任投资理念的影响下，优良的ESG表现能否提高企业融资效率成为各界关心的课题。本文以2017年至2022年上证1087家企业为研究对象，运用面板回归模型，实证检验了企业ESG表现对融资效率的影响。研究发现，企业ESG表现对提高企业的融资效率具有促进作用，其中环境、社会责任和公司治理方面均与企业融资效率呈显著的正相关关系。
Abstract: With the transformation of the pattern of economic development, developing green industry has become a new growth point of economic development in our country. Enterprise ESG performance is increasingly becoming a key indicator for evaluating whether enterprises can steadily develop. Under the influence of the concept of responsible investment, whether excellent ESG performance can improve enterprise financing efficiency has become a topic of concern to all circles. This paper takes 1087 Shanghai Stock Exchange companies from 2017 to 2022 as the research object and uses panel regression model to empirically test the impact of ESG performance on financing efficiency. It is found that corporate ESG performance has a promoting effect on improving corporate financing efficiency, in which corporate governance has a significant negative correlation with financing efficiency, while environmental and social responsibility have a significant positive correlation with corporate financing efficiency.
文章引用：徐晓伟. 企业ESG表现对融资效率的影响研究[J]. 低碳经济, 2024, 13(3): 178-185. https://doi.org/10.12677/jlce.2024.133017

参考文献

[1] 肖劲, 马亚军. 企业融资效率及理论分析框架[J]. 财经科学, 2004(S1): 337-340.
[2] 王文兵, 马德培, 干胜道. 国际ESG信息披露及其对中国的启示[J]. 财会月刊, 2023, 44(11): 135-142.
[3] 易碧文. 数据协同视角下的ESG信息披露标准化建设[J]. 财会月刊, 2022(17): 135-142.
[4] 王琳璘, 廉永辉, 董捷. ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2022(5): 23-34.
[5] 张琳, 赵海涛. 企业环境、社会和公司治理(ESG)表现影响企业价值吗?——基于A股上市公司的实证研究[J]. 武汉金融, 2019(10): 36-43.
[6] Yoon, B., Lee, J.H. and Byun, R. (2018) Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10, Article 3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Jayaraman, S. and Shivakumar, L. (2012) Agency-Based Demand for Conservatism: Evidence from State Adoption of Antitakeover Laws. Review of Accounting Studies, 18, 95-134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Balakrishnan, K., Core, J.E. and Verdi, R.S. (2013) The Relation between Reporting Quality and Financing and Investment: Evidence from Changes in Financing Capacity. Journal of Accounting Research, 52, 1-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] 曾康霖. 怎样看待直接融资与间接融资[J]. 金融研究, 1993(10): 7-11.
[10] 尚欣荣. 我国上市公司融资效率研究综述[J]. 技术与创新管理, 2011, 32(4): 346-349.
[11] 杨毅, 高玥, 吴晶晶. 供应链金融提升了上市公司的融资效率吗——基于两类会计稳健性视角的研究[J]. 会计之友, 2022(1): 52-60.
[12] 邱牧远, 殷红. 生态文明建设背景下企业ESG表现与融资成本[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(3): 108-123.
[13] Dimson, E., Karakaş, O. and Li, X. (2015) Active Ownership. Review of Financial Studies, 28, 3225-3268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Ghoul, S.E., Guedhami, O. and Kim, Y. (2017) Country-Level Institutions, Firm Value, and the Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 360-385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] 史敏, 蔡霞, 耿修林. 动态环境下企业社会责任、研发投入与债务融资成本——基于中国制造业民营上市公司的实证研究[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2017, 39(3): 111-124.
[16] 何贤杰, 肖土盛, 陈信元. 企业社会责任信息披露与公司融资约束[J]. 财经研究, 2012, 38(8): 60-71, 83.

为你推荐