京津冀知识产权案件集中管辖路径探析
Analysis of the Centralized Jurisdiction Path of Intellectual Property Cases in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
摘要: 为促进京津冀知识产权案件“同案同判”,保护知识产权人的利益,助力京津冀知识产权协同创新发展,有必要探索京津冀知识产权案件集中管辖路径。考虑到目前我国知识产权案件专门化、集中化管辖趋势,坚持两便原则,利用京津冀现有的智慧法院建设成果,结合京津冀各法院针对知识产权司法保护已经开展的探索,京津冀知识产权案件集中管辖具有充分的可行性。在具体制度构建时,需要充分考虑地域性、审判能力、管辖现状等因素,在保持知识产权案件一审地域管辖不变的情况下,由北京知识产权法院集中管辖京津冀知识产权二审案件,以促进京津冀知识产权案件的一致性保护,促进京津冀的协同发展。
Abstract: In order to promote the “like cases should be treated alike” of intellectual property cases in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, protect the interests of intellectual property owners, and facilitate the coordinated innovation and development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, it is necessary to explore the centralized jurisdiction path of intellectual property cases in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Considering the current trend of specialization and centralized jurisdiction of intellectual property cases in China, adhering to the principle of facilitating litigants’ litigation and courts’ exercise of judicial power, making use of the existing achievements of the construction of smart courts in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, and combining with the exploration of judicial protection of intellectual property rights in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, the centralized jurisdiction of intellectual property rights cases in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is fully feasible. When constructing specific systems, it is necessary to fully consider factors such as regionalism, judicial capacity, and current jurisdictional status. Under the condition of keeping the regional jurisdiction of the first instance of intellectual property cases unchanged, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court will centralize the second instance of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region intellectual property cases, so as to promote the consistent protection of intellectual property cases in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and promote the coordinated development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region.
文章引用:刘心如. 京津冀知识产权案件集中管辖路径探析[J]. 争议解决, 2024, 10(8): 87-91. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2024.108356

参考文献

[1] 易继明. 司法体制改革中的知识产权法庭[J]. 法律适用, 2019(3): 28-38.
[2] 刘银良. 我国知识产权法院设置问题论证[J]. 知识产权, 2015(3): 3-13+22.
[3] 李明德. 关于我国知识产权法院体系建设的几个问题[J]. 知识产权, 2018(3): 14-26.
[4] 咸胜强, 原晓爽. 京津冀协同发展背景下知识产权案件跨区域管辖与审理制度研究[J]. 法律适用, 2017(5): 45-52.
[5] 吴汉东. 中国知识产权法院建设:试点样本与基本走向[J]. 法律适用, 2015(10): 2-5.
[6] 易玲. 论知识产权法院体系的健全及其优化路径[J]. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 30(6): 151-155.
[7] 靳学军. 新时代高质量发展视阈下知识产权法院的实践与完善[J]. 中国应用法学, 2022(3): 67-81.
[8] 丁亮华. 我们需要怎样的专门法院[J]. 中外法学, 2024, 36(1): 161-180.
[9] 施业家, 吴忠良. 跨行政区划司法管辖制度的定位问题[J]. 理论月刊, 2017(2): 69-75.
[10] 韩秀成, 谢小勇, 王淇. 构建知识产权大保护工作格局的若干思考[J]. 知识产权, 2017(6): 83-86.