数字经济下考虑市场竞争的电商平台物流资源共享策略研究
Research on Logistics Resource Sharing Strategy of E-Commerce Platform Considering Market Competition under Digital Economy
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.133865, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 王维维:贵州大学管理学院,贵州 贵阳;刘小红*, 张人龙:贵州大学管理学院,贵州 贵阳;数字化转型与治理协同创新实验室,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 电子商务供应链市场竞争资源共享Stackelberg博弈E-Commerce Supply Chain Market Competition Resource Sharing Stackelberg Game
摘要: 数字经济与实体经济深入融合的背景下,针对电子商务行业物流资源供需矛盾及物流服务质量差异显著等问题,本文以一个电商平台、一个第三方卖家和消费者所组成的电子商务供应链为研究对象,并将市场竞争要素纳入考虑范畴,分别构建无物流资源共享和物流资源共享模式下的Stackelberg博弈模型,探究市场竞争下物流资源共享对电商平台和第三方卖家产品定价、市场需求和企业利润的影响。研究发现:1) 当市场竞争程度较小时,物流资源共享会扩大第三方卖家的市场需求,降低电商平台的市场需求。2) 当市场竞争程度较大时,物流资源共享将会提高博弈双方产品的销售单价。3) 当市场竞争程度为[0.57, 0.67]时,物流资源共享将会实现博弈双方收益的帕累托改进,实现博弈双方“共赢”。
Abstract: Under the background of the deep integration of the digital economy and the real economy, for the contradiction between the supply and demand of logistics resources in the e-commerce industry and the significant difference in the quality of logistics services, this paper takes the e-commerce supply chain composed of an e-commerce platform, a third-party seller and consumers as the object of study, and takes the elements of market competition into account, and constructs the Stackelberg game model under the mode of no logistics resource sharing and logistics resource sharing respectively. Stackelberg’s game model is constructed to investigate the effects of logistics resource sharing on product pricing, market demand and corporate profits of e-commerce platforms and third-party sellers under market competition. The study finds that: 1) When the degree of market competition is small, logistics resource sharing will expand the market demand of third-party sellers and reduce the market demand of e-commerce platforms. 2) When the degree of market competition is large, the sharing of logistics resources will increase the unit price of the products of both parties to the game. 3) When the degree of market competition is [0.57, 0.67], the sharing of logistics resources will realize the Pareto improvement of the benefits of both sides of the game, and realize the “win-win” situation of both sides of the game.
文章引用:王维维, 刘小红, 张人龙. 数字经济下考虑市场竞争的电商平台物流资源共享策略研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(3): 7018-7026. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.133865

参考文献

[1] 张剑雄, 慕静, 康林. 考虑品牌差异及权力结构的电商物流模式决策研究[J/OL]. 运筹与管理, 2024: 1-8.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/34.1133.G3.20240311.1847.004.html, 2024-05-29.
[2] 蒋丽, 王洪艳, 梁昌勇. 新零售背景下卡车与无人机协同的电商物流末端配送优化[J/OL]. 系统管理学报, 2023: 1-13.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1977.N.20231115.1720.004.html, 2024-05-29.
[3] 牟进进, 王淑云. 跨境电商供应链物流增值服务的优化决策[J/OL]. 中国管理科学, 2023: 1-13. 2024-05-29.[CrossRef
[4] Zheng, K., Zhang, Z. and Song, B. (2020) RETRACTED: E-Commerce Logistics Distribution Mode in Big-Data Context: A Case Analysis of JD.COM. Industrial Marketing Management, 86, 154-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 南江霞, 张莉, 张茂军, 等. 云服务供应链多人合作与技术创新决策的两型博弈模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(7): 1771-1783.
[6] Lee, C.K.M., Ng, C.K., Chung, S.Y. and Keung, K.L. (2023) Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Logistics System with Nested MAX-MIN Ant Algorithm for E-Commerce Logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 211, Article 118643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Kang, K., Zhong, R.Y., Xu, S.X., Tan, B.Q., Wang, L. and Peng, T. (2021) Auction-Based Cloud Service Allocation and Sharing for Logistics Product Service System. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, Article 123881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Zhang, S., Dan, B. and Zhou, M. (2019) After-Sale Service Deployment and Information Sharing in a Supply Chain under Demand Uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 279, 351-363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 覃雪莲, 刘志学. 考虑供应商竞争的电子商务供应链物流服务模式优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(1): 125-136.