大数据“杀熟”视域下的消费者权益的保护
Protection of Consumers’ Rights and Interests from the Perspective of Big Data “Killing”
摘要: 关于大数据“杀熟”的性质,许多学者将他认为是一种算法歧视行为。大数据“杀熟”行为不符合传统的商业道德,在一定程度上也违背了公序良俗原则,而且会侵害消费者合法权益。关于我国如何规制大数据“杀熟”行为,存在的现行法律难以直接适用、消费者举证困难、消费者个人数据保护力度不足等问题。要想使大数据“杀熟”行为得到更好的规制,首先必须建立健全相关的立法,明确大数据“杀熟”的法律性质、在大数据“杀熟”领域实行举证责任倒置、引入美欧为实现对算法歧视的控制而采取的法律方法。保障大数据产业和电商市场的健康可持续发展态势,切实的维护在市场经济中处于弱势一方的消费者的合法权益。
Abstract: About the big data to charge a loyalty penalty, the theoretical world generally thinks that he is one kind of algorithm discrimination behavior. In the context of law, algorithmic discrimination refers to “First-class price discrimination”, which is based on data and information analysis technology. To some extent, it also violates the principles of public order and good customs, and it will infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. There are many problems in how to regulate big data to charge a loyalty penalty in our country, e.g. the illegality judgment is vague, the consumers have difficulty in giving evidence, the law does not provide a complete basis for the right of claim and so on. If we want to make big data to charge a loyalty penalty behavior get better regulation, we must first establish and improve the relevant legislation, clarify the legal nature of big data to charge a loyalty penalty, introduce Reversing of burden in the field of big data to charge a loyalty penalty, and introduce legal approaches adopted by the US and Europe to achieve control over algorithmic discrimination, safeguard the healthy and sustainable development of big data industry and e-commerce market, and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of consumers who are on the weak side in the market economy.
文章引用:马丹丹. 大数据“杀熟”视域下的消费者权益的保护[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(3): 7857-7863. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.133963

参考文献

[1] 刘向晖. 网络营销差别定价策略的一个案例分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2003(7): 59-60.
[2] 张芳琳. 中消协发布2018年十大消费维权舆情热点[J]. 中国消费者, 2019(1): 72-75.
[3] 李琳. 平台经济中“大数据杀熟”的理论阐释与治理对策[J]. 商业经济研究, 2022(18): 90-93.
[4] 邹开亮, 刘佳明. 大数据“杀熟”的法律规制困境与出路——仅从《消费者权益保护法》的角度考量[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2018(8): 47-50.
[5] 喻玲. 算法消费者价格歧视反垄断法属性的误读及辨明[J]. 法学, 2020(9): 83-99.
[6] 胡元聪, 冯一帆. 大数据杀熟中消费者公平交易权保护探究[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(1): 161-176.
[7] 朱建海. “大数据杀熟”的法律规制困境及其破解路径[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 33(1): 64-72.
[8] 张益. “大数据杀熟”现象法律规制困境及对策研究[J]. 经济师, 2022(1): 76-77.
[9] 程雪军. 超级平台算法价格歧视的反垄断规制[J]. 法治研究, 2023, 145(1): 99-111.
[10] 金幼芳, 王凯莉, 张汀菡. 《个人信息保护法》视角下“大数据杀熟”的法律规制[J]. 浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 46(6): 693-701.
[11] 许光耀. 价格歧视行为的反垄断法分析[J]. 法学杂志, 2011, 32(11): 21-24.
[12] 赵海乐. 当权利面对市场:算法价格歧视的法律规制研究[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 35(3): 99-106.