基于KMV模型的我国上市公司信用风险对比研究
Comparative Study on Credit Risk of Listed Companies in China Based on KMV Model
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.1331022, PDF,   
作者: 刘焓杕:贵州大学经济学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 信用风险KMV模型SV模型Credit Risk KMV Model SV Model
摘要: 近两年中国上市公司由于受到新的冠状物疫情的冲击,经济增速放缓,面临种种危机,信用风险受到很大考验,而规避违约风险对公司未来的发展不仅有好处,而且在制度稳定性方面也将起到明显的作用。因此,我们选择了KMV模型与GARCH模式和SV模式相结合,对上市公司的股票收益波动率进行重新拟合和估算,以此来衡量上市公司的资信管理,采用调整后的GARCH-KMV模型和SV-KMV模型,对上市公司中的9家ST企业与9家非ST企业的信用风险进行了对比研究。结果显示,传统的KMV可以更好地衡量上市公司的信用风险,在结合GARCH模型和SV模型后也可以衡量上市公司的信用风险,但SV模型对于信用风险的解释效果要好于GARCH模型。
Abstract: Impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the growth rate of China’s economy has slowed down, and listed companies in China are facing various crises. Credit risk is under significant testing, and avoiding default risk is not only beneficial for the future development of companies but also crucial for the stability of the system. Therefore, this study employs the KMV model to measure the credit quality of listed companies and combines the GARCH and SV models to re-estimate the volatility of equity value for these companies. The revised GARCH-KMV model and SV-KMV model are then applied to compare and analyze the credit risk of 9 ST companies and 9 non-ST companies in the listed market. The results indicate that the traditional KMV model can effectively measure the credit risk of listed companies, and incorporating the GARCH and SV models improves its credit risk measurement. Furthermore, the SV-KMV model demonstrates a better explanatory effect on credit risk compared to the GARCH-KMV model.
文章引用:刘焓杕. 基于KMV模型的我国上市公司信用风险对比研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(3): 8341-8351. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1331022

参考文献

[1] Altman, E.I. (1968) Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23, 589-609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Altman, E.I., Haldeman, R.G. and Narayanan, P. (1977) ZETATM Analysis a New Model to Identify Bankruptcy Risk of Corporations. Journal of Banking & Finance, 1, 29-54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Taylor, S.J. (1986) Modeling Financial Time Series. John Wiley and Sons.
[5] Kim, S., Shepherd, N. and Chib, S. (1998) Stochastic Volatility: Likelihood Inference and Comparison with ARCH Models. Review of Economic Studies, 65, 361-393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 蒋正权, 张能福. KMV模型的修正及其应用[J]. 统计与决策, 2008(9): 67-69.
[7] 周子元, 杨永生. 用违约距离判别信用风险: 一个实证研究[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2007(2): 81-85.
[8] 王莉. 引入违约距离的修正KMV模型在财务危机预警中的应用[J]. 统计与决策, 2017(17): 88-91.
[9] 杨柳勇, 王礼月. 行业与区域视角下的债券信用风险度量——基于LJD-KMV模型的实证研究[J]. 财会月刊, 2018(14): 155-161.
[10] 段翀. 基于PFM模型与倾向匹配得分法的中小企业信用风险评估[J]. 征信, 2020, 38(6): 35-42.
[11] 孙亮, 吕丹妮. 我国共享经济企业信用风险度量的案例分析——基于KMV修正模型的实证研究[J]. 技术经济, 2021, 40(6): 132-139.
[12] 郭立仑, 周升起. 商业银行信用风险主要影响因素来自内部还是外部?——基于KMV及随机森林模型的实证研究[J]. 会计与经济研究, 2022, 36(1): 105-124.
[13] 蔡真, 林菁, 薄栋. 房地产调控与房企违约风险——基于KMV模型和面板回归的分析[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 35(5): 115-127.
[14] 凌华, 周会洋, 沈云, 等. 地方政府专项债券的风险测度与预警研究[J]. 会计之友, 2021(4): 61-67.
[15] 张慧, 王宁, 孟纹羽. 基于分形KMV模型的地方政府债券安全发行规模测度[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(15): 133-136.
[16] 李绍荣, 刘星洋. 城投债信用风险的压力测试: 基于优化后的KMV模型[J]. 新视野, 2023(6): 79-87.
[17] 余素红, 张世英. SV与GARCH模型对金融时间序列刻画能力的比较研究[J]. 系统工程, 2002, 20(5): 28-33.
[18] 余素红, 张世英. SV和GARCH模型拟合优度比较的似然比检验[J]. 系统工程学报, 2004, 19(6): 625-629.