父母教养方式对专科学生学业成就的影响研究——以自我效能为中介
Research on the Impact of Parenting Styles on Academic Achievement of Vocational College Students—Self-Efficacy as a Mediator
DOI: 10.12677/ve.2024.135213, PDF,   
作者: 左雨沁:格乐大学国际学院,泰国 曼谷
关键词: 学习动机父母教养方式学习效能Learning Motivation Parenting Style Learning Efficacy
摘要: 目的:研究旨在探讨河南省公立专科院校学生的父母教养方式对其学习成就的影响,并考察自我效能在这一关系中的中介作用。方法:通过问卷调查,对411名学生进行系统抽样,获取有效样本,所有量表的信效度均达到学术研究标准,并使用SPSS 26.0进行统计分析。结果:研究结果显示,父母教养方式对学生的学习成就有显著正向影响,同时对学生的自我效能也有显著正向影响。此外,学生的自我效能对其学习成就有显著正向影响,并在父母教养方式与学习成就之间起到中介作用。结论:积极、支持性的父母教养方式有助于提高学生的学业成绩,培养其学习动力和自信心。自我效能感作为中介因素,显著影响父母教养方式对学生学习成就的影响程度。
Abstract: Objective: This study aims to explore the impact of parenting styles on the academic achievement of students in public vocational colleges in Henan Province, and to examine the mediating role of self-efficacy in this relationship. Method: A systematic sampling method was used to select 411 students who participated in the survey. The validity and reliability of all scales met academic research standards, and SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The results indicate that parenting styles have a significant positive impact on students’ academic achievement and also significantly influence students’ self-efficacy. Furthermore, students’ self-efficacy positively affects their academic achievement and mediates the relationship between parenting styles and academic achievement. Conclusion: Positive and supportive parenting styles contribute to improving students’ academic performance, fostering their learning motivation and self-confidence. Self-efficacy, as a mediating factor, significantly affects the impact of parenting styles on students’ academic achievement.
文章引用:左雨沁. 父母教养方式对专科学生学业成就的影响研究——以自我效能为中介[J]. 职业教育发展, 2024, 13(5): 1355-1361. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2024.135213

参考文献

[1] Francis, A., Pai, M.S. and Badagabettu, S. (2020) Psychological Well-Being and Perceived Parenting Style among Adolescents. Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing, 44, 134-143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Milevsky, A., Schlechter, M., Netter, S. and Keehn, D. (2006) Maternal and Paternal Parenting Styles in Adolescents: Associations with Self-Esteem, Depression and Life-Satisfaction. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 39-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Xie, Q., Fan, W., Wong, P. and Cheung, F.M. (2015) Personality and Parenting Style as Predictors of Life Satisfaction among Chinese Secondary Students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 423-432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Richter, N., Bondü, R. and Trommsdorff, G. (2022) Linking Transition to Motherhood to Parenting, Children’s Emotion Regulation, and Life Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Family Psychology, 36, 291-300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Gong, X., Fletcher, K.L. and Bolin, J.H. (2015) Dimensions of Perfectionism Mediate the Relationship between Parenting Styles and Coping. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 259-268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Nijhof, K.S. and Engels, R.C.M.E. (2007) Parenting Styles, Coping Strategies, and the Expression of Homesickness. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 709-720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Wolfradt, U., Hempel, S. and Miles, J.N.V. (2003) Perceived Parenting Styles, Depersonalisation, Anxiety and Coping Behaviour in Adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 521-532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 王连伟, 谢一凡. 完善教育制度是促进中国社会进步的有效途径[J]. 黑龙江教师发展学院学报, 2021, 40(1): 1-4.
[9] 肖莉莉. 父母教养方式对儿童影响的研究综述[J]. 祖国, 2017(2): 2.
[10] 翟秀军. 大学生自我决定学习动机与学业自我效能感对学业成绩的影响[J]. 长江丛刊, 2017(27): 270.
[11] 伍小东, 段海燕. 父母教养方式和自我效能感对研究生创造力倾向的影响[J]. 陕西教育学院学报, 2019, 35(1): 79-83.
[12] Gorsuch, R.L. (1983) Factor Analysis Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale.
[13] 柯小敏. 父母教养方式与大学生反刍思维的关系: 拒绝敏感性的中介作用[J]. 成长, 2023(6): 19-21.
[14] 洪福源, 黄德祥, 邱绍一. 台中市高中学生学习自我效能量表的测量与现况分析[J]. 教育经营与管理研究集刊, 2014(10): 27-66.
[15] 李宪印, 杨娜. 情绪智力与大学生学业成就关系的实证研究——以地方普通高校为例[J]. 中国成人教育, 2016(7): 78-81.
[16] Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986) The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef