优质系统化护理对预防ICU老年患者谵妄发生的影响
The Impact of High-Quality Systematic Nursing on the Prevention of Delirium in Elderly ICU Patients
摘要: 目的:探讨优质系统化护理对预防ICU老年患者谵妄发生的影响。方法:方便取样2023年3月份~2024年3月份在某三甲医院ICU病房治疗的76例机械通气治疗后出现谵妄的老年患者,依据随机性原则分为对照组、观察组,各38例,对照组护理方式为常规护理,观察组采取优质系统化护理,比较两组护理后的临床指标与不良反应发生情况。结果:在护理后对照组机械通气时间、ICU住院时间9.36 ± 1.36 d、15.23 ± 1.98 d,与观察组6.45 ± 2.15 d、8.45 ± 1.23 d比较差异显著,p < 0.05;对照组不良反应发生率26.31%,明显比观察组7.90%高,p < 0.05;护理后对照组注意力、意识水平、意识状况、思维混乱评评分2.65 ± 1.31分、2.98 ± 1.24分、3.02 ± 1.45分、2.64 ± 1.02分,与观察组6.12 ± 1.25分、6.89 ± 1.75分、7.12 ± 1.04分、6.78 ± 1.76分相比差异显著,p < 0.05。结论:优质系统化护理应用在老年机械通气谵妄患者中,能够改善患者临床症状,将患者不良反应发生率降低。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the impact of high-quality systematic nursing on the prevention of delirium in elderly ICU patients. Methods: Convenient sampling was used to select 76 elderly patients with delirium after mechanical ventilation treatment in the ICU ward of a tertiary hospital from March 2023 to March 2024. They were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 38 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing, and the observation group received high-quality systematic nursing. The clinical indicators and the occurrence of adverse reactions after nursing in the two groups were compared. Results: After nursing, the mechanical ventilation time and ICU hospitalization time in the control group were 9.36 ± 1.36 days and 15.23 ± 1.98 days, respectively, which were significantly different from those in the observation group (6.45 ± 2.15 days and 8.45 ± 1.23 days), p < 0.05. The incidence of adverse reactions in the control group was 26.31%, which was significantly higher than that in the observation group (7.90%), p < 0.05. After nursing, the scores of attention, consciousness level, consciousness status, and confusion of thinking in the control group were 2.65 ± 1.31 points, 2.98 ± 1.24 points, 3.02 ± 1.45 points, and 2.64 ± 1.02 points, respectively, which were significantly different from those in the observation group (6.12 ± 1.25 points, 6.89 ± 1.75 points, 7.12 ± 1.04 points, and 6.78 ± 1.76 points), p < 0.05. Conclusion: The application of high-quality systematic nursing in elderly patients with mechanical ventilation delirium can improve the clinical symptoms of patients and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
窦英茹, 戴雪梅, 郭晓娟, 等. 早期床上脚踏车运动预防ICU或EICU机械通气患者谵妄的效果观察[J]. 现代临床护理, 2018, 17(10): 28-33.
|
|
[2]
|
汪玲, 尹皓, 张俊, 等. 集束化干预策略预防ICU机械通气患者谵妄的研究进展[J]. 牡丹江医学院学报, 2018, 39(4): 108-112.
|
|
[3]
|
刘培培, 李津, 王晓冉, 等. ABCDE集束化干预在ICU机械通气病人中应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 循证护理, 2018, 4(6): 481-487.
|
|
[4]
|
刘玉静. 120例ICU机械通气老年患者谵妄的原因分析与护理措施[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2018, 3(3): 23, 26.
|
|
[5]
|
孙福月, 杨宁, 李超, 等. 镇静镇痛集束护理对ICU气管插管患者谵妄的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(10): 58-61.
|
|
[6]
|
袁伟蓉, 李苏娜, 廖玲芳, 等. 早期活动结合护理干预对ICU机械通气患者谵妄发生率的影响[J]. 中国医学创新, 2018, 15(10): 84-87.
|
|
[7]
|
胡流芳, 罗海红, 陆蓓娜. 质量改进模式指导的集束干预策略在预防机械通气患者谵妄以及疗效观察[J]. 中国基层医药, 2018, 25(18): 2443-2445.
|
|
[8]
|
孙丹丹, 柴文昭, 郭海凌, 等. 不同类型谵妄在机械通气患者中的发生现状及临床结局比较[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2018, 53(7): 778-782.
|
|
[9]
|
饶巧莹, 尹志勤, 胡海红, 等. 常规护理联合早期活动对预防ICU机械通气患者谵妄的应用研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2017, 15(9): 1609-1611.
|
|
[10]
|
禹月萍. 机械通气患者ICU综合症的病因分析及护理对策[J]. 中国保健营养, 2018, 28(2): 289.
|
|
[11]
|
王维. 探究ICU护士主导的目标性镇静镇痛安全护理管理策略[J]. 心理医生, 2018, 24(26): 253.
|
|
[12]
|
麻苗, 郭俊玲, 白妮, 等. 镇静镇痛集束策略对机械通气患者谵妄及临床预后的干预研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2018, 34(15): 1150-1153.
|
|
[13]
|
白睿敏, 刘延锦, 张帅. 郑州市ICU护士谵妄护理相关知识的掌握情况及影响因素分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2018, 24(6): 697-700.
|