弧形切角三角形超高层建筑风荷载体型系数研究
Study on Wind Load Shape Coefficient of Curved Tangential Triangle High-Rise Buildings
摘要: 以大连绿地中心项目为工程背景,基于Fluent软件对弧形切角三角形超高层建筑进行风荷载数值模拟研究。首先对CAARC高层建筑标准模型进行模拟合理性分析验证。然后在0˚风向角来流下分析该建筑的风压分布和体型系数分布规律,并与我国荷载规范给出的截角三角形平面体型系数值进行比较分析。结果表明:结构主迎风面为正风压,其余面均为负风压;结构体型系数总体上随着建筑结构高度变化规律增加而逐渐增大,但在0.3 H高度时的弧形凹角处出现最大负值,局部体型系数发生突变;对于弧形切角三角形超高层建筑,由于次迎风面弧形凹角处产生了较强的分离流和涡脱过程,导致此处的体型系数为较大的负值,与规范取值有较大差别,其余面模拟结果均与规范相近,在结构设计时应注意此处取值影响。
Abstract: A numerical simulation study of wind loads on a curved tangential triangle super high-rise building was conducted using Fluent software, with the Dalian Greenland Center project serving as the engineering context. The study began by validating the simulation’s methodology and parameters through a rationality analysis using the CAARC tall building standard model. Subsequently, the wind pressure distribution and shape coefficient distribution were analyzed under an incoming flow at a 0˚ wind direction. These results were then compared with the shape coefficient values for truncated triangular plan shapes as specified in the Chinese load codes. The findings indicate that the primary windward face of the structure experiences positive wind pressure, while the remaining faces experience negative wind pressure. The shape coefficient generally increases with building height but exhibits a maximum negative value at the curved concave corner at 0.3 H height, where a local abrupt change in the shape coefficient is observed. For curved-chamfered triangular supertall buildings, the presence of strong flow separation and vortex shedding at the concave corner on the secondary windward face results in a significantly negative shape coefficient in this region, which differs markedly from the values specified in the codes. The simulation results for the other faces are generally consistent with the standards. These discrepancies should be carefully considered during structural design.
文章引用:李义磊, 管计, 周伟. 弧形切角三角形超高层建筑风荷载体型系数研究[J]. 建模与仿真, 2024, 13(5): 5395-5404. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2024.135489

参考文献

[1] 顾明, 张正维, 全涌. 降低超高层建筑横风向响应气动措施研究进展[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(3): 317-323.
[2] 丁通, 陈水福. 凸角处理对弧边三角形高层建筑气动特性影响的研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2022, 52(14): 109-114.
[3] Amin, J. and Ahuja, A.K. (2010) Aerodynamic Modifications to the Shape of the Buildings: A Review of the State-of-the-Art. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 11, 433-450.
[4] Asghari Mooneghi, M. and Kargarmoakhar, R. (2016) Aerodynamic Mitigation and Shape Optimization of Buildings: Review. Journal of Building Engineering, 6, 225-235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 董欣, 丁洁民, 邹云峰, 左太辉. 倒角化处理对于矩形高层建筑风荷载特性的影响机理研究[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38(6): 151-162+208.
[6] 王昊, 王国砚, 张建. 带凹角矩形截面高层建筑风荷载体型系数研究[J]. 结构工程师, 2019, 35(6): 102-108.
[7] Kareem, A., Kijewski, T. and Tamura, Y. (1999) Mitigation of Motions of Tall Buildings with Specific Examples of Recent Applications. Wind and Structures, 2, 201-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Baghaei Daemei, A., Khotbehsara, E.M., Nobarani, E.M. and Bahrami, P. (2019) Study on Wind Aerodynamic and Flow Characteristics of Triangular-Shaped Tall Buildings and CFD Simulation in Order to Assess Drag Coefficient. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 10, 541-548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB50009-2012建筑结构荷载规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
[10] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. JGJ/T338-2014建筑工程风洞试验方法标准[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.
[11] 徐宗凯. 基于壁面带阳台的不同体型高层建筑风致响应研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2018.
[12] 罗攀. 基于标准模型的风洞试验研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 同济大学, 2004.
[13] Melbourne, W.H. (1980) Comparison of Measurements on the CAARC Standard Tall Building Model in Simulated Model Wind Flows. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 6, 73-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 杨伟. 基于RANS的结构风荷载和响应的数值模拟研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 同济大学, 2004.