资本市场开放对企业ESG表现的引导作用:来自“沪港通”的经验证据
The Influence of Stock Market Liberalization on Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from “Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect”
摘要: 企业ESG表现的提升不仅有利于经济高质量发展,而且有利于国内企业按照更高的标准走向国际,实现更高水平的“走出去”。研究选取了2011年至2020年间在中国A股市场上市的企业为研究对象,同时以2014年启动的沪港通交易制度作为特定事件,探讨资本市场开放对企业环境、社会和治理(ESG)表现的影响。研究结果表明:资本市场开放有利于提升企业ESG表现水平。在经过一系列稳健性检验后,该结论依然成立。异质性分析表明,国有企业和非重污染企业的ESG表现提升更为明显。机制研究表明,资本市场的开放性能够通过减轻企业的融资限制并改善投资者构成,进而提高企业的ESG表现。进一步分析表明,资本市场开放对企业的环境和公司治理表现的提升更为显著,对企业社会责任表现不显著。此外,“董监高”具有海外背景以及高质量外部审计有利于提升企业ESG表现。
Abstract: The improvement of corporate ESG performance not only benefits the high-quality development of the economy but also facilitates domestic companies to achieve higher standards and go global, realizing a higher level of “going out”. This paper, based on the initial sample of listed companies on the A-share market in China from 2011 to 2020, and utilizing the implementation of the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect trading system in 2014, investigates the relationship between capital market openness and corporate ESG performance. The results show that capital market openness is beneficial to improving the level of corporate ESG performance. After various robustness checks, this conclusion remains valid. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that ESG performance improvements are more significant for state-owned enterprises and non-polluting companies. Mechanism analysis suggests that capital market openness alleviates corporate financing constraints and optimizes investor structures, thereby improving corporate ESG performance. Further analysis indicates that capital market openness has a more significant impact on environmental and corporate governance performance, but does not have a significant impact on corporate social responsibility performance. Additionally, the presence of “directors, supervisors, and managers” with overseas backgrounds and high-quality external audits is beneficial for enhancing corporate ESG performance.
文章引用:王晨屹. 资本市场开放对企业ESG表现的引导作用:来自“沪港通”的经验证据[J]. 可持续发展, 2024, 14(9): 2355-2370. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2024.149268

参考文献

[1] 连立帅, 朱松, 陈超. 资本市场开放与股价对企业投资的引导作用: 基于沪港通交易制度的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(3): 100-118.
[2] Edmans, A. (2014) Blockholders and Corporate Governance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 6, 23-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Giese, G., Lee, L., Melas, D., Nagy, Z. and Nishikawa, L. (2019) Foundations of ESG Investing: How ESG Affects Equity Valuation, Risk, and Performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45, 69-83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, M. and Matos, P. (2011) Does Governance Travel around the World? Evidence from Institutional Investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 100, 154-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 陈运森, 黄健峤, 韩慧云. 股票市场开放提高现金股利水平了吗?——基于“沪港通”的准自然实验[J]. 会计研究, 2019(3): 55-62.
[6] 谢红军, 吕雪. 负责任的国际投资: ESG与中国OFDI [J]. 经济研究, 2022, 57(3): 83-99.
[7] 李增福, 陈嘉滢. 企业ESG表现与短债长用[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(12): 152-171.
[8] 张宗新, 张晓荣, 廖士光. 上市公司自愿性信息披露行为有效吗?——基于1998-2003年中国证券市场的检验[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2005(1): 369-386.
[9] 王翌秋, 谢萌, 郭冲. 企业ESG表现影响银行信贷决策吗——基于中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2023, 38(5): 97-114.
[10] 庞家任, 张鹤, 张梦洁. 资本市场开放与股权资本成本——基于沪港通、深港通的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020(12): 169-188.
[11] 唐逸舟, 王婧文, 王姝晶. 资本市场开放与企业债券融资成本——来自沪深港通的经验证据[J]. 证券市场导报, 2020(7): 52-60.
[12] 李小林, 司登奎, 王可心. 我国资本市场开放能否促进企业自主创新?——基于“沪深港通”交易制度的经验证据[J]. 统计研究, 2024, 41(5): 51-63.
[13] 宋献中, 潘婧, 韩杰. 资本市场国际化的鞭策效应: A股纳入MSCI指数与企业ESG表现[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(4): 153-172.
[14] 钟覃琳, 陆正飞. 资本市场开放能提高股价信息含量吗?——基于“沪港通”效应的实证检验[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(1): 169-179.
[15] 何青, 庄朋涛. 共同机构投资者如何影响企业ESG表现? [J]. 证券市场导报, 2023(3): 3-12.
[16] 雷雷, 张大永, 姬强. 共同机构持股与企业ESG表现[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(4): 133-151.
[17] Hadlock, C.J. and Pierce, J.R. (2010) New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving beyond the KZ Index. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 1909-1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 王守坤, 范文诚. 金融可得性与碳排放——来自金融地理结构的宏观与微观证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(1): 67-89.