无人机在多目标工程侦察中的路径优化问题研究
Research on Path Optimization of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Multi-Target Engineering Reconnaissance
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2024.135506, PDF,   
作者: 魏 洪*:陆军工程大学野战工程学院,江苏 南京;31602部队信息系统运维室,安徽 蚌埠;屠义强, 于海宝, 樊 涛, 唐林杰:陆军工程大学野战工程学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 无人机工程侦察路径优化头脑风暴优化算法(BSO)模拟退火算法(SA)遗传算法(GA)Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) Engineering Reconnaissance Path Optimization Brain Storm Optimization Algorithm (BSO) Simulated Annealing Algorithm (SA) Generation Algorithm (GA)
摘要: 使用四旋翼无人机实施工程侦察,已经成为指挥所构筑与伪装行动中选址侦察的重要手段,无人机对多个工程作业目标实施侦察时的路径优化问题,是旅行商问题(Travelling Salesman problem, TSP)的典型应用,属于组合优化中的非确定性多项式完全(Non-deterministic Polynomial Complete, NPC)问题之一。头脑风暴优化算法(Brain Storm Optimization Algorithm, BSO)、模拟退火算法(Simulated Annealing Algorithm, SA)和遗传算法(Generation Algorithm, GA)都属于解决此问题的启发式智能优化算法,本文通过问题描述、数学建模和算法原理逐步介绍求解思路与方法,并将求解结果进行对比分析,数据表明,头脑风暴优化算法求解速度快、收敛度好、结果更优,能够更好地解决当前部队面临的无人机多目标侦察任务中的路径优化问题。
Abstract: The use of four-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in engineering reconnaissance has become an important means of location reconnaissance in command post construction and camouflage operations. The path optimization problem of UAVs for reconnaissance of multiple engineering targets is a typical traveling salesman problem. It’s one of the nondeterministic polynomial complete problems in combinatorial optimization. Brain Storm Optimization Algorithm (BSO), Simulated Annealing Algorithm (SA) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) are heuristic optimization algorithms to solve this problem. In this paper, through problem description, mathematical modeling and algorithm principle, the solution ideas and methods are introduced step by step, and the results are compared and analyzed. The Brain Storming Optimization Algorithm has the advantages of high speed, good convergence and better results, which can better solve the path optimization problem of UAV multi-target reconnaissance mission.
文章引用:魏洪, 屠义强, 于海宝, 樊涛, 唐林杰. 无人机在多目标工程侦察中的路径优化问题研究[J]. 建模与仿真, 2024, 13(5): 5586-5597. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2024.135506

参考文献

[1] Dantzig, G., Fulkerson, R. and Johnson, S. (1954) Solution of a Large-Scale Traveling-Salesman Problem. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2, 393-410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Shi, Y. (2011) Brainstorm Optimization Algorithm. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y.H., Chai, Y. and Wang, G.Y., Eds., Advances in Swarm Intelligence, Part I, Springer, 303-309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Steinbrunn, M., Moerkotte, G. and Kemper, A. (1997) Heuristic and Randomized Optimization for the Join Ordering Problem. The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, 6, 191-208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Holland, J.H. (1975) Adaptation in Naturel and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Application to Biology, Control and Artificial Intelligence. Bradford Books.
[5] 杨玉婷, 史玉回, 夏顺仁. 基于讨论机制的头脑风暴优化算法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2013, 47(10): 1705-1711.
[6] Ma, L., Cheng, S. and Shi, Y. (2021) Enhancing Learning Efficiency of Brainstorm Optimization via Orthogonal Learning Design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51, 6723-6742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 王珺. 基于模拟退火算法的民航运输路径优化技术研究[J]. 电子设计工程, 2023, 20(31): 77-81.
[8] 陈科胜, 鲜思东, 郭鹏. 求解旅行商问题的自适应升温模拟退火算法[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2021, 3(2): 245-254.
[9] 孙鉴, 刘淞佐, 武晓晓, 等. 基于Spark的并行模拟退火算法求解TSP [J]. 理论与算法, 2022, 4(45): 53-58.
[10] 杨锦涛, 赵春香, 杨成福. 基于遗传算法求解TSP问题的研究及Matlab实现[J]. 智能计算机与应用, 2023, 13(7): 58-63.
[11] Lamini, C., Benhlima, S. and Elbekri, A. (2018) Genetic Algorithm Based Approach for Autonomous Mobile Robot Path Planning. Procedia Computer Science, 127, 180-189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 李金, 付春龍. 基于TSP问题的遗传算法和蚁群算法研究[J]. 电脑编程技巧与维护, 2021(9): 17-18+66.
[13] 张铃, 张拔. 遗传算法机理的研究[J]. 软件学报, 2000, 11(7): 945-952.