农业领域基因利用限制技术使用的权利冲突研究
Research on the Conflict of Rights in the Use of Genetic Use Restriction Technologies in Agriculture
摘要: 基因利用限制技术(GURTs)是一种极端的知识产权保护方式。即使其引发的争议不断,跨国种业公司也依旧致力于该技术的研发和使用推广。基因利用限制技术带来的权利冲突主要有品种权人知识产权与农民留种权的冲突、个人知识产权与公共权利的冲突、发达国家知识产权与发展中国家发展权的冲突。通过分析这三对冲突,可以试想我国现有法律体系下权利冲突的消解路径,包括将使用GURTs的育种创新成果作为特殊知识产权保护、确保相关基因库的可得性、对留种权的受损进行补偿、保持农民多样化选择、加强市场监管防止垄断,以及加强生态安全监管。通过这些措施,以期平衡利益相关方的权利,维护公共领域,并促进我国农业的可持续发展。
Abstract: Genetic Use Restriction Technologies (GURTs) is an extreme form of intellectual property protection. Despite the controversy, multinational seed companies are committed to developing the technology and promoting its use. The conflicts of rights brought by GURTs mainly include the conflicts of intellectual property rights of variety owners and farmers’ seed retention rights, the conflicts of individual intellectual property rights and public rights, and the conflicts of intellectual property rights of developed countries and development rights of developing countries. By analyzing these three pairs of conflicts, we can imagine the resolution path of rights conflicts under China’s existing legal system, including using the breeding innovation results of GURTs as special intellectual property protection, ensuring the availability of relevant gene banks, compensating for the loss of seed retention rights, maintaining farmers’ diversified choices, strengthening market supervision to prevent monopoly, and strengthening ecological safety supervision. These measures are aimed at balancing the rights of stakeholders, safeguarding the public sphere and promoting the sustainable development of our agriculture.
文章引用:孙嘉蔚. 农业领域基因利用限制技术使用的权利冲突研究[J]. 法学, 2024, 12(10): 5941-5948. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2024.1210844

参考文献

[1] Segarra, A.E. and Rawson, J.M. (1999) The “Terminator Gene” and Other Genetic Use Restriction Technologies (GURTs) in Crops. Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service.
[2] FAO (2000) Implications and Development of Biotechnology, Report for the 25th FAO Regional Conference for Asia and the Pacific, Yokohama, Japan.
[3] 刘雨璇. 论农民留种权与农民权益的保护[J]. 中国种业, 2021(8): 1-6.
[4] 周莳文. 基因利用限制技术中的技术超越与伦理嬗变[J]. 知识产权, 2015(1): 51-55.
[5] Kloppenburg, J.R. (2004) First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology. University of Wisconsin Press.
[6] Mascarenhas, M. and Busch, L. (2006) Seeds of Change: Intellectual Property Rights, Genetically Modified Soybeans and Seed Saving in the United States. Sociologia Ruralis, 46, 122-138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 李道国, 谭涛. 国际植物新品种保护联盟公约背景下的农民留种行为分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2006(3): 23-27.
[8] 王志本. 从UPOV1991文本与1978文本比较看国际植物新品种保护的发展趋向[J]. 中国种业, 2003(2): 1-7.
[9] 罗忠玲, 邹彩芬, 王雅鹏. 国际植物新品种知识产权保护模式研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2006(1): 92-96.
[10] 胡波. 知识产权法正当性理论的批判与重构[J]. 社会科学研究, 2023(3): 90-102.
[11] 刘银良. 生物技术的知识产权保护[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2009.
[12] 根据《关于审理侵害植物新品种权纠纷案件具体应用法律问题的若干规定(二)》[Z].
[13] 李菊丹. 论育种创新成果的商业秘密保护——兼评最高人民法院审理的首例亲本商业秘密保护案[J]. 法学杂志, 2023, 44(1): 128-143.