循经捣刺督脉和少阳经穴治疗慢性紧张型头痛的临床观察
Clinical Observation on the Treatment of Chronic Tension-Type Headache by Acupuncture Du Channel and Shaoyang Channel Points
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2024.14102712, PDF,   
作者: 师东波：黑龙江中医药大学研究生院，黑龙江 哈尔滨；于学平*：黑龙江中医药大学附属第一医院针灸三科，黑龙江 哈尔滨
关键词: 慢性紧张型头痛；督脉；少阳经；捣刺；针刺治疗；Chronic Tension-Type Headache； Governor Vessel； Shaoyang Channel； Pound and Prick； Acupuncture Treatment
摘要: 目的：观察循经捣刺督脉和少阳经穴治疗慢性紧张型头痛临床疗效。方法：60例CTTH患者采用随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组，每组30例。治疗组采用循经捣刺法，对照组采用常规针刺法，均每日治疗1次，每周治疗6次，连续治疗4周，采用VAS评分、头痛指数及焦虑自测量表比较两组疗效。结果：两组患者治疗后VAS评分、头痛指数及SAS评分均显著下降，与对照组比较差异显著(P < 0.05)，治疗组愈显率显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论：循经捣刺督脉和少阳经穴能减轻慢性紧张型头痛患者的头痛症状，缓解焦虑情绪，其疗效优于常规针刺法。
Abstract: Objective: To observe the clinical effect of acupuncture Du vein and Shaoyang meridian on chronic tension-type headache. Methods: 60 CTTH patients were divided into treatment group and control group by random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. The treatment group was treated with meridian ramming method, while the control group was treated with conventional acupuncture method, once a day, 6 times a week for 4 consecutive weeks. VAS score, headache index and self-measuring anxiety scale were used to compare the efficacy of the two groups. Results: VAS score, headache index and SAS score of 2 groups were significantly decreased after treatment, and the difference was significant compared with the control group (P < 0.05), the cure rate of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The curative effect of acupuncture is better than that of conventional acupuncture, which can relieve headache symptoms and anxiety in patients with chronic tension-type headache.
文章引用：师东波, 于学平. 循经捣刺督脉和少阳经穴治疗慢性紧张型头痛的临床观察[J]. 临床医学进展, 2024, 14(10): 674-679. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2024.14102712

参考文献

[1] 吴江, 贾建平, 崔丽英, 等. 神经病学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015.
[2] Dong, Z., Di, H., Dai, W., Liang, J., Pan, M., Zhang, M., et al. (2012) Application of ICHD-II Criteria in a Headache Clinic of China. PLOS ONE, 7, e50898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 杜昕欣, 周兰, 卢泽堂, 等. 紧张型头痛的药物治疗[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2021, 27(7): 529-533.
[4] 朱玉飞, 王璐, 董钊, 等. 310例紧张型头痛病人临床特点分析[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2014, 20(8): 565-568.
[5] 武家竹, 张曼, 杜元灏. 针灸治疗紧张性头痛的Meta分析与GRADE评价[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2023, 50(5): 1-6.
[6] 于学平, 郑心智, 邹伟. 捣刺法与提插法针刺治疗慢性紧张型头痛的疗效比较[J]. 上海针灸杂志, 2022, 41(1): 10-13.
[7] Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (2018) The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia, 33, 629-808.
[8] 粱繁荣, 王华. 针灸学[M]. 第10版. 北京: 中国中医药出版社, 2016.
[9] 高万露, 汪小海. 视觉模拟疼痛评分研究的进展[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2013, 42(12): 144-146.
[10] 国家中医药管理局全国脑病急症协作组. 头风诊断与疗效评定标准[J]. 山东中医学院学报, 1993(5): 69.
[11] 张明园, 何燕玲. 现代精神医学丛书 精神科评定量表手册[M]. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 2015.
[12] 王莉, 王颖, 吴海洋. 通督调神针刺治疗颈源性头痛思路探析[J]. 中医药临床杂志, 2020, 32(12): 2199-2202.
[13] Rene, C., Marc, D., Jolanda, M., et al. (2021) Pericranial Total Tenderness Score in Patients with Tension-Type Headache and Migraine. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Physician, 24, 1177-1189.

为你推荐