生物刺激素“秋实皆”和“思甜”对阳光玫瑰果重和果实均匀度的改善
Effects of Biostimulants “Qiushijie” and “Sitian” on Grape “Shine Muscat” Weight and Size Uniformity Improvement
DOI: 10.12677/hjas.2024.1410143, PDF,   
作者: 齐 季, 刘统棋:北京艾格鲁国际农业科技有限公司,北京;吴展才*:马来西亚低投入可持续农业践行联盟,马来西亚 吉隆坡
关键词: 阳光玫瑰“秋实皆”“思甜”Grape “Shine Muscat” “Qiushijie” “Sitian”
摘要: 近年来,“阳光玫瑰”葡萄近因过度追求亩产量,加上田间管理不当,果实品质量下降,市场价格急剧下滑等问题,在全国各地引起关注。本研究使用生物刺激素组合,包括含多肽类和生物碱的产品“秋实皆”和“思甜”进行冲施和叶面喷施,调查其对果品质量改善的效益。结果显示,亩冲施5公斤“秋实皆” + 叶喷300倍“思甜”的试验组,平均单果重可达12.6克,较对照组高出1.1克。试验组比对照组平均纵径多出5.8%的拉长率,维持平均果形指数达到1.1以上。糖度方面,试验组果串顶部和底部果实,均比对照组高出1~2度。产品方案对“阳光玫瑰”具有增重、改善外观和糖度的效益。
Abstract: Fruit quality decline in “Shine Muscat” grapes due to excessive yield per acre and improper field management is noteworthy issues in recent years for grape farm in China. This study conducts experiments of biostimulants, including products containing polypeptides and alkaloids, namely “Qiushijie” and “Sitian”, for ground flooding and foliar spraying. Investigation on their effectiveness in improving fruit quality was done. The results showed that, groups flooding with “Qiushijie” combined with foliar application 300 times dilution of “Sitian” displayed average single fruit weight of 12.6 grams, which was 1.1 grams higher than the control group. The experimental group also exhibited an average elongation rate of 5.8%, higher than the control group, maintaining a fruit shape index of above 1.1. In terms of sugar content, both the top and bottom fruits in the experimental group displayed sweetness levels that were 1~2 degrees higher than those in the control group. The combination of these products demonstrated positive benefits for “Shine Muscat” grapes on weight, fruit size, and fruit sweetness.
文章引用:齐季, 吴展才, 刘统棋. 生物刺激素“秋实皆”和“思甜”对阳光玫瑰果重和果实均匀度的改善[J]. 农业科学, 2024, 14(10): 1131-1138. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjas.2024.1410143

参考文献

[1] Agudelo-Morales, C.E., Lerma, T.A., Martínez, J.M., Palencia, M. and Combatt, E.M. (2021) Phytohormones and Plant Growth Regulators—A Review. Journal of Science with Technological Applications, 10, 27-65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Kaur, K. and Harbhajan, S. (2011) Pharmacological Importance of Natural Alkaloids: A Review. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 5, 19-29.
[3] 程大伟, 陈锦永, 顾红, 郭西智, 张洋, 张杰, 李明. 阳光玫瑰葡萄果实质量等级规范[J]. 果农之友, 2018(10): 35-36.
[4] Malécange, M., Sergheraert, R., Teulat, B., Mounier, E., Lothier, J. and Sakr, S. (2023) Biostimulant Properties of Protein Hydrolysates: Recent Advances and Future Challenges. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24, Article 9714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Colla, G., Hoagland, L., Ruzzi, M., Cardarelli, M., Bonini, P., Canaguier, R., et al. (2017) Biostimulant Action of Protein Hydrolysates: Unraveling Their Effects on Plant Physiology and Microbiome. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, Article 2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Moreno-Hernández, J.M., Benítez-García, I., Mazorra-Manzano, M.A., Ramírez-Suárez, J.C. and Sánchez, E. (2020) Strategies for Production, Characterization and Application of Protein-Based Biostimulants in Agriculture: A Review. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 80, 274-289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Djordjevic, M.A., Mohd-Radzman, N.A. and Imin, N. (2015) Small-Peptide Signals That Control Root Nodule Number, Development, and Symbiosis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66, 5171-5181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Wang, G., Zhang, G. and Wu, M. (2016) CLE Peptide Signaling and Crosstalk with Phytohormones and Environmental Stimuli. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, Article 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Zhang, H., Hu, Z., Lei, C., Zheng, C., Wang, J., Shao, S., et al. (2018) A Plant Phytosulfokine Peptide Initiates Auxin-Dependent Immunity through Cytosolic Ca2+ Signaling in Tomato. The Plant Cell, 30, 652-667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 刘悦, 孙敬国, 云月利, 孙光伟, 陈振国, 李建平, 朱蓉, 高享坤, 李亚东. 多肽肥对烟田土壤改良及烤烟生长发育的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2024, 52(4): 76-83.
[11] 房晓宇, 卢滇楠, 刘铮. 污染土壤生物修复技术的进展与工程应用现状[J]. 化工进展, 2023, 42(12): 6498-6506.
[12] Matsuura, H.N. and Fett-Neto, A.G. (2015) Plant Alkaloids: Main Features, Toxicity, and Mechanisms of Action. In: Gopalakrishnakone, P., Carlini, C. and Ligabue-Braun, R., Eds., Plant Toxins, Springer, 1-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Wink, M. and Twardowski, T. (1992) Allelochemical Properties of Alkaloids. Effects on Plants, Bacteria and Protein Biosynthesis. In: Rizvi, S.J.H. and Rizvi, V., Eds., Allelopathy, Springer, 129-150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Irwin, R.E., Cook, D., Richardson, L.L., Manson, J.S. and Gardner, D.R. (2014) Secondary Compounds in Floral Rewards of Toxic Rangeland Plants: Impacts on Pollinators. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62, 7335-7344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Vilariño, M.d.P. and Ravetta, D.A. (2008) Tolerance to Herbivory in Lupin Genotypes with Different Alkaloid Concentration: Interspecific Differences between Lupinus albus L. and L. angustifolius L. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 63, 130-136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef