市场一体化水平对出口产品技术复杂度的影响——基于中国地级市的面板数据
The Impact of Market Integration Level on Technical Complexity of Export Products—Based on Panel Data of Prefecture-Level Cities in China
摘要: 本文立足于我国统一大市场的构建，在理论上探讨了我国统一大市场构建过程中，各城市间的分工和扭曲与其出口产品质量之间的内在联系，并在此基础上，通过实证分析不同地区间的市场整合水平对其出口技术复杂性的影响。本文以中国293个地级市为研究对象，采用价格法、Hausmann二步法等方法，对我国内地293个城市的市场一体化指数与出口技术复杂度进行测度，并对其发展状况进行分析。在此基础上，本文从多个角度系统研究了国内各城市的市场一体化发展对出口技术复杂度的影响机制。研究发现，国内各城市的市场一体化水平显著促进了出口技术复杂度，在进行异质性检验及稳健性检验后依然成立；且不同地理区位的市场一体化发展水平对出口技术复杂度的影响也有所不同。因此，突破市场分割、强化区域间联动、推动市场整合发展，既是实现“制造强国”目标的必要保证，也是对“有为政府”与“有效市场”相结合的积极探索。
Abstract: Based on the construction of large unified market in our country, this paper discusses the internal relations between the division of labor and distortion among cities and the quality of their export products during the construction of large unified market in theory. Based on this, the paper empirically analyzes the impact of market integration level of different regions on the export technical complexity. Taking 293 prefecture-level cities in China as the research object, this paper uses price method, Hausmann two-step method and other methods to measure the market integration index and export technology complexity of 293 cities in China’s mainland, and analyzes their development status. On this basis, this paper systematically studies the influence mechanism of the market integration development of domestic cities on the complexity of export technology from multiple perspectives. It is found that the market integration level of domestic cities significantly promotes the complexity of export technology, which is still valid after the heterogeneity test and robustness test. Moreover, the influence of market integration development level in different geographical locations on the technological complexity of export is also different. Therefore, breaking through market segmentation, strengthening inter-regional linkage, and promoting market integration and development are not only necessary guarantees to achieve the goal of “manufacturing power”, but also active exploration of the combination of “promising government” and “effective market”.
文章引用：芮雪阳, 李丽霞. 市场一体化水平对出口产品技术复杂度的影响——基于中国地级市的面板数据[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2024, 14(5): 419-431. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2024.145483

参考文献

[1] 雷娜, 张汝飞. “双循环”视角下国内市场整合对出口技术复杂度升级的空间溢出效应研究[J]. 当代经济管理, 2021, 43(9): 18-28.
[2] 刘胜, 陈秀英. 市场化进程推动了制造业出口技术复杂度的提升吗?——来自中国省际面板数据的经验证据[J]. 当代经济管理, 2016, 38(6): 63-68.
[3] 孙博文, 孙久文. 长江经济带市场一体化的空间经济增长与非对称溢出效应[J]. 改革, 2019(3): 72-86.
[4] 施炳展, 邵文波. 中国企业出口产品质量测算及其决定因素-培育出口竞争新优势的微观视角[J]. 管理世界, 2014(9): 90-106.
[5] 陆铭, 陈钊. 分割市场的经济增长-为什么经济开放可能加剧地方保护? [J]. 经济研究, 2009, 44(3): 42-52.
[6] 张亚丽, 项本武. 城市群一体化水平的测度及其经济增长效应研究——来自中国十大城市群的经验证据[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2021(12): 136-148, 158.
[7] 尹庆民, 祁硕硕. 区域一体化对经济发展质量的影响研究——基于长三角中心区域城市的准自然实证分析[J]. 软科学, 2023, 37(1): 31-39.
[8] 许璐. 金融结构市场化导向与出口技术复杂度——基于跨国面板数据的实证分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2017(2): 136-143.
[9] 齐俊妍, 王永进, 施炳展, 等. 金融发展与出口技术复杂度[J]. 世界经济, 2011, 34(7): 91-118.
[10] 雷日辉, 张亚斌. 金融发展对国家出口产品技术复杂度提升的验证[J]. 求索, 2013(1): 20-22.
[11] 张艳, 赵凌雪, 刘青. 要素价格与新发展格局构建: 基于工业用地价格与企业国际国内市场选择的证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(5): 134-155.
[12] 丁一兵, 宋畅. 出口市场份额、FDI流入与中国制造业出口技术复杂度[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019(6): 117-132.
[13] 王永进, 盛丹, 施炳展, 李坤望. 基础设施如何提升了出口技术复杂度? [J]. 经济研究, 2010, 45(7): 103-115.
[14] 熊永莲, 谢建国, 文淑惠. 人口年龄结构与出口技术复杂度——基于跨国面板的实证分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2018(12): 39-52.
[15] 胡沅洪, 戴一鑫, 孙生. 经济政策不确定性对制造业出口技术复杂度的影响研究[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(8): 14-22.
[16] 毛其淋, 盛斌. 对外经济开放、区域市场整合与全要素生产率[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, 11(1): 181-210.
[17] 强永昌, 杨航英. 市场一体化、空间溢出与区域出口质量升级——基于长三角市场一体化的经验分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2021(10): 1-16.
[18] 田晖, 韦志文, 宋清. 市场化进程、创新投入与出口技术复杂度——基于省际面板数据的中介效应分析[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 49(1): 82-89.
[19] 刘洪铎. 产业集聚对出口技术复杂度的影响研究——基于外贸发展方式转变视角的实证分析[J]. 中国社会科学院研究生院学报, 2016(4): 39-47.
[20] 刘信恒. 国内市场分割与出口产品质量升级——来自中国制造业企业的证据[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2020(11): 30-44.
[21] Hallak, J.C. and Sivadasan, J. (2009) Productivity, Quality and Exporting Behavior under Minimum Quality Requirements. NBER Working Paper.
[22] Khandelwal, A.K., Schott, P.K. and Wei, S. (2013) Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters. American Economic Review, 103, 2169-2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Khandelwal, A. (2010) The Long and Short (of) Quality Ladders. Review of Economic Studies, 77, 1450-1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Nevo, A. (2001) Measuring Market Power in the Ready-To-Eat Cereal Industry. Econometrica, 69, 307-342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Barrios, S., Görg, H. and Strobl, E. (2003) Explaining Firms’ Export Behaviour: R & D, Spillovers and the Destination Market. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65, 475-496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Gråsjö, U. (2005) Human Capital, R & D and Regional Export Performance. The Royal Institute of Technology, Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies (CESIS) Electronic Working Paper Series.
[27] Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A. (2003) Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 317-341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[28] Thomas, V.J., Sharma, S. and Jain, S.K. (2011) Using Patents and Publications to Assess R & D Efficiency in the States of the USA. World Patent Information, 33, 4-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[29] Karvonen, M. and Kässi, T. (2013) Patent Citations as a Tool for Analysing the Early Stages of Convergence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 1094-1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[30] Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J. and Zhang, Y. (2012) Creative Accounting or Creative Destruction? Firm-Level Productivity Growth in Chinese Manufacturing. Journal of Development Economics, 97, 339-351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐