聚焦性书面纠正性反馈在大学英语写作课堂中的应用:一项基于诊断性测试的实践探索
Application of Focused Written Corrective Feedback in College English Writing Classrooms: A Practical Exploration Based on Diagnostic Assessment
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2024.14101982, PDF,   
作者: 罗艳荣:娄底幼儿师范高等专科学校,湖南 冷水江
关键词: 纠正性反馈书面表达准确性诊断性测试Corrective Feedback Written Accuracy Diagnostic Assessment
摘要: 近年来,关于聚焦性书面纠正性反馈的研究激增。然而,大多数研究采用的是实验或准实验设计,主要针对少数错误类别,忽视了教师在课堂上的实际需求。本研究旨在探讨如何利用写作诊断性测试来指导真实二语写作课堂中聚焦性书面纠正性反馈的运用实践。研究结果表明,学生文本中错误密度差异较大,语言水平较高的学生错误密度较低且写作篇幅较长。在错误频率和严重性方面,学生在动词时态、用词选择和标点符号方面容易频繁出错,而严重错误主要集中在句子结构、表达和用词选择上。此外,对学生书面表达准确性进行诊断性测试,不仅能有效识别其在写作中的语言优劣,还能为教师和学生提供指导反馈和自我评估的重要依据,在写作课堂中具有重要的作用。
Abstract: In recent years, there has been a surge of research on focused written corrective feedback (FWCF). However, much of this research has been based on experimental or quasi-experimental designs, concentrating on a limited range of error categories, thereby overlooking the practical needs of teachers in real classroom settings. This study aims to explore how diagnostic writing assessment can be leveraged to improve FWCF practices in authentic L2 writing classrooms. The results reveal considerable variation in error density across student texts, with higher proficiency learners producing fewer errors and writing longer texts. Common errors include issues with verb tense, word choice, and punctuation, while more severe errors pertain to sentence structure, expression, and word choice. Furthermore, diagnostic assessment of students’ written accuracy not only effectively pinpoints their strengths and weaknesses but also functions as a valuable tool for delivering instructional feedback and facilitating self-assessment, playing a pivotal role in classroom writing evaluation.
文章引用:罗艳荣. 聚焦性书面纠正性反馈在大学英语写作课堂中的应用:一项基于诊断性测试的实践探索[J]. 教育进展, 2024, 14(10): 1111-1120. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2024.14101982

参考文献

[1] Wang, X., Shen, L. and Lu, X. (2015) Journal between Peer Learners: An Innovative Project to Motivate EFL Writers. RELC Journal, 47, 245-252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Harris, M. and Silva, T. (1993) Tutoring ESL Students: Issues and Options. College Composition & Communication, 44, 525-537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Hinkel, E. (2002) Second Language Writers’ Text: Linguistics and Rhetorical Features. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[4] Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. (2007) The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Hyland, K. (2013) Student Perceptions of Hidden Messages in Teacher Written Feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 180-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Ferris, D.R. (2014) Responding to Student Writing: Teachers’ Philosophies and Practices. Assessing Writing, 19, 6-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Lee, I. (2019) Teacher Written Corrective Feedback: Less Is More. Language Teaching, 52, 524-536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Hyland, K. and Anan, E. (2006) Teachers’ Perceptions of Error: The Effects of First Language and Experience. System, 34, 509-519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Lee, I. (2008) Understanding Teachers’ Written Feedback Practices in Hong Kong Secondary Classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 69-85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Hyland, K. and Hyland, F. (2006) Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83-101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ferris, D. (2011) Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Second Edition, University of Michigan Press/ELT. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Hairston, M. (1986) On Not Being a Composition Slave. In: Bridges, C.W., Ed., Training the New Teacher of College Composition, NCTE, 117-124.
[13] Lee, I. (2010) Writing Teacher Education and Teacher Learning: Testimonies of Four EFL Teachers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 143-157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Lee, I., Yu, S. and Liu, Y. (2017) Hong Kong Secondary Students’ Motivation in EFL Writing: A Survey Study. TESOL Quarterly, 52, 176-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Xu, C. (2009) Overgeneralization from a Narrow Focus: A Response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008). Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 270-275.
[16] Bonilla López, M., Van Steendam, E. and Buyse, K. (2017) Comprehensive Corrective Feedback on Low and High Proficiency Writers: Examining Attitudes and Preferences. ITLInternational Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168, 91-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Lee, I., Mak, P. and Burns, A. (2015) Bringing Innovation to Conventional Feedback Approaches in EFL Secondary Writing Classrooms: A Hong Kong Case Study. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 14, 140-163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 王利娜, 李少锋, 牟蕾, 等. 国内外语教学中纠正性反馈有效性的元分析[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2023(2): 57-70+116+145.
[19] 肖平飞, 刘欣婷. 直接聚焦与直接非聚焦书面纠正性反馈对英语写作介词习得的影响研究[J]. 外语电化教学, 2021(3): 44-49+7.
[20] 胡忠坤. 基于诊断性测评的英语写作教学中负迁移问题研究[J]. 黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报, 2019, 32(6): 141-143.
[21] Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M. and Lam, J. (2010) Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 395-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Kim, Y. (2011) Diagnosing EAP Writing Ability Using the Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model. Language Testing, 28, 509-541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Llosa, L., Beck, S.W. and Zhao, C.G. (2011) An Investigation of Academic Writing in Secondary Schools to Inform the Development of Diagnostic Classroom Assessments. Assessing Writing, 16, 256-273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Xie, Q. (2019) Error Analysis and Diagnosis of ESL Linguistic Accuracy: Construct Specification and Empirical Validation. Assessing Writing, 41, 47-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Knoch, U. (2009) Diagnostic Assessment of Writing: A Comparison of Two Rating Scales. Language Testing, 26, 275-304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] James, C. (2013) Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. Routledge.