面子理论视角下性别语言中的拒绝策略差异研究
A Study on the Differences in Refusal Strategies in Gender Language from the Perspective of Face Theory
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2024.1210940, PDF,   
作者: 姚天齐:浙江财经大学外国语学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 拒绝性别差异礼貌面子理论Rejection Gender Differences Politeness Face Theory
摘要: 语言是社会的镜像,深刻映射出社会的传统根基、风俗惯习及文化意识的内在精髓。鉴于人类天然存在的性别二元性,语言层面亦不可避免地展现出性别差异的痕迹。拒绝言语,作为一种本质上威胁个体面子的交际行为(即FTA,Face-Threatening Act的缩略),往往促使表达者采取礼貌策略进行拒绝,旨在缓解对受话者面子的潜在冲击,从而维系双方关系的和谐与融洽。本文从性别维度深入剖析拒绝言语行为中潜在的差异性,并探索这些差异背后的成因机制。此研究不仅旨在增进对性别语言特征的理解,更期望通过揭示这些差异,为跨性别交流提供实践指导,减少因性别语言差异导致的沟通障碍,进而促进更加顺畅、高效的交际效果,实现更为和谐的社交互动。
Abstract: Language is a mirror of society, reflecting deeply the traditional foundations, customs, and inner essence of culture. Given the inherent binary nature of gender, language cannot help but leave traces of gender differences. Refusing to speak, a communicative act that fundamentally threatens an individual’s face (i.e., the abbreviation of FTA, Face-Threatening Act), often prompts the speaker to adopt polite strategies to reject the request, aiming to mitigate the potential impact on the listener’s face and maintain harmony in the relationship. This article analyzes the potential differences in refusal speech behavior from a gender perspective, exploring the causal mechanisms behind these differences. This study aims not only to enhance understanding of gender-specific language features, but also to provide practical guidance for cross-gender communication by revealing these differences, thereby reducing communication barriers caused by gender language differences and achieving more smooth and efficient communication effects, and promoting more harmonious social interactions.
文章引用:姚天齐. 面子理论视角下性别语言中的拒绝策略差异研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2024, 12(10): 662-671. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2024.1210940

参考文献

[1] 章凤花. 国外拒绝言语行为实证研究综述与展望[J]. 外文研究, 2023, 11(4): 10-18+102-103.
[2] 陈政君. 从“面子理论”看性别语言差异[J]. 山西青年, 2021(14): 91-92.
[3] Brown, L. (1978) Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. Question and Politeness. In: Goody, E., Ed., Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge University Press, 56-310.
[4] Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.
[5] 谢剑萍, 付永钢. 中西礼貌原则与“入乡随俗”原则[J]. 兰州学刊, 2005(3): 299-302.
[6] 王玉晓. 面子理论在课堂教学中的应用[J]. 安阳师范学院学报, 2010(3): 114-116.
[7] 崔丽萍. 20世纪中西方女权与女德的发展历程及其关系探讨[J]. 宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版), 2020, 40(5): 101-107.
[8] 岳芸. 社会语言学视角下的网络性别称谓语研究[J]. 今古文创, 2023(12): 121-123.
[9] 高珍. 汉语拒绝言语行为的性别差异研究[J]. 科技视界, 2013(2): 102.
[10] 施栋琴. 语言与性别差异研究综述[J]. 外语研究, 2007(5): 38-42.
[11] 郭飞. 社会语言学视角下电影《誓言》中的性别语言研究[J]. 今古文创, 2021(17): 111-112.
[12] 张丽莉. 论性别差异及其教育策略[J]. 淮南师范学院学报, 2011, 13(4): 90-92.