商标恶意异议法律规制研究
Research on the Legal Regulation of Malicious Trademark Objection
摘要: 现行《商标法》几经修改,商标异议制度日趋完善,但恶意异议现象仍未被有效遏制。基于商标在经济市场中日益重要的地位及商标恶意异议行为的社会危害性,对商标恶意异议现象进行法律规制具有高度必要性。明晰商标恶意异议现象的概念后,通过梳理域内外关于商标恶意异议的相关法律规制,总结可参考经验,结合我国实践情况,探索立法、司法、行政层面上的规制手段,构建完备详细的中国特色商标异议制度,有效维护市场诚信公平竞争,保障社会权益,促进创新发展。
Abstract: After several amendments to the current “Trademark Law”, the trademark objection system has become increasingly perfect, but the phenomenon of malicious objection has not been effectively contained. Based on the increasingly important status of trademark in the economic market and the social harm of the malicious objection of trademark, it is highly necessary to regulate the phenomenon of malicious objection of trademark. After clarifying the concept of the phenomenon of malicious objection to trademarks, by combing the relevant legal regulations on malicious objection to trademarks inside and outside the domain, summarizing the reference experience, combining with the practice of China, exploring the regulatory means at the legislative, judicial and administrative levels, building a complete and detailed trademark objection system with Chinese characteristics, effectively maintaining market integrity and fair competition, protecting social rights and interests, and promoting innovation and development.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
潘高扬. 浅析我国商标异议制度的完善——以“微信商标”案为例[J]. 法制与经济, 2018(7): 56-57.
|
|
[2]
|
于亚敏, 叶梦沅, 刘秀秦, 李娜, 林炝炀. 商标异议程序前置课题研究报告[J]. 中华商标, 2020(12): 66-74.
|
|
[3]
|
徐明. 我国商标恶意诉讼的司法规制优化研究——以民事抗辩权为展开进路[J]. 知识产权, 2020(11): 86-96.
|
|
[4]
|
朱军华. 商标注册中的恶意异议[J]. 经营管理者, 2006(7): 24.
|
|
[5]
|
朱丹丹. 商标异议全程电子化及电子化证据的采信[J]. 中华商标, 2019(2): 45-47.
|
|
[6]
|
徐晓建. 适用赔偿责任制裁滥用法律程序[J]. 中华商标, 2005(2): 13-14.
|