“提笔忘字”现象:输入法对汉字书写和认知的影响
Forgetting Characters When Picking up a Pen: The Impact of Input Methods on Chinese Character Writing and Cognition
摘要: 随着数字化时代的到来,汉字书写从传统的手写转向打字输入,导致了“提笔忘字”这一现象的出现。文章探讨了两种主要的汉字输入法——拼音输入法和五笔输入法——对汉字书写和认知的影响。通过分析汉字书写系统的特点和不同输入法对字形识别、词汇识别及书写产生的影响,文章揭示了这些输入法对汉字书写能力的潜在影响。并提出了一些可能的假设:拼音输入法倾向于强化语音信息的使用,而五笔输入法则强调字形部件的记忆,从而可能对汉字的识别和书写产生不同的效果。文章的研究不仅有助于理解“提笔忘字”现象的根源,还为改进汉字教育方法提供了实用的建议,以平衡技术进步与传统书写习惯之间的关系。
Abstract: With the advent of the digital age, Chinese character writing has shifted from traditional hand-writing to typing input, leading to the phenomenon of “forgetting characters when picking up a pen”. This paper explores the impact of two primary Chinese character input methods—Pinyin input and Wubi input—on character writing and cognition. By analyzing the characteristics of Chinese writing systems and the effects of different input methods on character recognition, vocabulary recognition, and writing production, this study reveals the potential impacts of these input methods on writing proficiency. The research indicates that Pinyin input tends to reinforce the use of phonetic information, while Wubi input emphasizes the memory of character components, potentially resulting in different effects on character recognition and writing. This study not only aids in understanding the roots of the “forgetting characters when picking up a pen” phenomenon but also provides practical recommendations for improving Chinese character education methods to balance technological advancements with traditional writing habits.
文章引用:刘佳慧. “提笔忘字”现象:输入法对汉字书写和认知的影响[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2024, 13(10): 487-493. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2024.1310949

参考文献

[1] Li, X.S., Zhang, Q.W., et al. (2024) Computational Modeling and Experimental Validation of Chinese Lexical and Semantic Processing. Advances in Psychological Science, 32, 1379-1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Sun, C.C. (2018) Lexical Processing in Simplified Chinese: An Investigation Using a New Large-Scale Lexical Database. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 唐兰. 中国文字学[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1979: 2.
[4] 苏培成. 汉字的性质和优点[J]. 中国文字研究, 2021(2): 187-190.
[5] 裘锡圭. 文宇学概要[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2013: 9.
[6] 吕叔湘. 汉语文的特点和当前的语文问题语文近著[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 1987: 142.
[7] 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部. 2023年通信业统计公报解读[EB/OL].
https://wap.miit.gov.cn/gxsj/tjfx/txy/art/2024/art_c3f0194a3a8141488885fc26ca5c98fd.html, 2024-01-24.
[8] 王永民. 计算机汉字键盘设计“三原理” [J]. 计算机学报, 2005, 28(5): 870-881.
[9] 方燕红, 张积家. 五笔输入法和拼音输入法的认知效率比较[J]. 井冈山大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 34(5): 66-71.
[10] 管奕婷. 从汉字输入法浅析“提笔忘字”现象[J]. 中国文艺家, 2019(1): 76-77.
[11] 王永民, 杨桃源. 警觉拼音输入法对运用汉字能力的销蚀[J]. 汉字文化, 2006(1): 18-19.
[12] 张积家, 张厚粲. 汉字认知过程中整体与部分关系论[J]. 应用心理学, 2001, 7(3): 57-62.
[13] 张积家. 汉字词认知过程中整体与部分关系论[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2002, 24(3): 91-94+90.
[14] 毕鸿燕, 翁旭初. 出声阅读中语音通达的双通路模型[J]. 生物物理学报, 2006, 22(5): 325-330.
[15] Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P. and Haller, M. (2000) Models of Reading Aloud: Dual-Route and Parallel-Distributed-Processing Approaches. Exploring Cognition: Damaged Brains and Neural Networks. Psychology Press.
[16] Chen, Y. and Yeh, S. (2015) Binding Radicals in Chinese Character Recognition: Evidence from Repetition Blindness. Journal of Memory and Language, 78, 47-63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Luo, C., Proctor, R.W., Weng, X. and Li, X. (2013) Spatial Stroop Interference Occurs in the Processing of Radicals of Ideogrammic Compounds. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 715-720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P. and Keuleers, E. (2017) The Word Frequency Effect in Word Processing: An Updated Review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 45-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Giraudo, H. and Grainger, J. (2000) Effects of Prime Word Frequency and Cumulative Root Frequency in Masked Morphological Priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421-444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Hasenäcker, J. and Schroeder, S. (2019) Compound Reading in German: Effects of Constituent Frequency and Whole-Word Frequency in Children and Adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 920-933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R. and Baayen, R.H. (2009) Reading Polymorphemic Dutch Compounds: Toward a Multiple Route Model of Lexical Processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 876-895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Bien, H., Levelt, W.J.M. and Baayen, R.H. (2005) Frequency Effects in Compound Production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 17876-17881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Kuperman, V., Bertram, R. and Baayen, R.H. (2008) Morphological Dynamics in Compound Processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1089-1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Zhang, B. and Peng, D. (1992) Decomposed Storage in the Chinese Lexicon. In: Advances in Psychology, Elsevier, 131-149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Yu, L., Liu, Y. and Reichle, E.D. (2021) A Corpus-Based versus Experimental Examination of Word and Character-Frequency Effects in Chinese Reading: Theoretical Implications for Models of Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150, 1612-1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Xiong, J., Yu, L., Veldre, A., Reichle, E.D. and Andrews, S. (2023) A Multitask Comparison of Word and Character-Frequency Effects in Chinese Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49, 793-811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] 杨玉芳. 心理语言学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.