“少捕慎诉慎押”背景下企业环境犯罪的刑事司法路径
The Criminal Justice Path of Enterprise the Criminal Justice Path of Enterprise Environmental Crime under the Background of “Less Arrest, Cautious Prosecution and Detention”
摘要: 本文主要探讨“少捕慎诉慎押”刑事司法政策的原理及其在环境犯罪涉案企业及其负责人在司法激励领域的应用。首先,解释“少捕慎诉慎押”的基本内涵,并分析了该政策发展的时代背景,包括实体法、程序法及司法实践层面的变革。接着提出在“少捕慎诉慎押”背景下,对涉环境犯罪企业负责人酌定不起诉的司法路径,包括构建涉案企业负责人酌定不起诉制度,以及对涉案企业直接责任人依法实施少捕、慎诉、慎押的措施。
Abstract: This article mainly discusses the principles of the criminal justice policy of “less arrest, cautious prosecution and detention” and its application in the field of judicial incentives for enterprises and their principals involved in environmental crimes. Firstly, it explains the basic connotation of “less arrest, cautious prosecution and detention” and analyzes the historical background of the policy’s development, including changes in substantive law, procedural law, and judicial practice. Then, it proposes a judicial path for discretionary non-prosecution of persons in charge of enterprises involved in environmental crimes under the background of “less arrest, cautious prosecution and detention”, including the establishment of a discretionary non-prosecution system for persons in charge of enterprises involved in cases and the implementation of measures for less arrest, cautious prosecution, and cautious detention of directly responsible persons in enterprises involved in cases in accordance with the law.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
庄永廉, 孙长永, 苗生明, 等. 少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策的内涵功能及其落实[J]. 人民检察, 2021(15): 37-44.
|
|
[2]
|
王敏远, 李嘉. “少捕慎诉慎押”的法理分析[J]. 法治研究, 2023(6): 3-17.
|
|
[3]
|
吕丽. 中国传统慎刑观对“制刑之义”的阐释[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2012(6): 150-157.
|
|
[4]
|
徐彪, 陈玉苹, 梁风培. 犯罪结构变化与少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策的贯彻落实[J]. 中国检察官, 2022(19): 29-32.
|
|
[5]
|
蒋兰香. 公司污染环境的刑事判决样态、问题与应对——基于200个判决的实证分析[J]. 时代法学, 2021(4): 19-30.
|
|
[6]
|
吕忠梅. 环境法新视野[M]. 中国政法大学出版社, 2019.
|
|
[7]
|
童建明. 论不起诉权的合理适用[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2019(4): 23-34.
|
|
[8]
|
卞建林. 慎诉的理论展开与制度完善[J]. 法学, 2022(10): 126-143.
|