基于数值模拟的轻质土路桥过渡段差异沉降分析
Analysis of Differential Settlement in Lightweight Soil Road-Bridge Transition Sections Based on Numerical Simulation
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2024.1310219, PDF,   
作者: 殷 明*, 张 政, 王向南:济南城市建设集团有限公司,山东 济南;荣 玉, 王立旗:山东大学齐鲁交通学院,山东 济南
关键词: 差异沉降泡沫轻质土数值模拟路桥过渡段密度Differential Settlement Foam Lightweight Soil Numerical Simulation Road-Bridge Transition Section Density
摘要: 路桥过渡段桥头跳车问题日益凸显成为软土地区高速公路建设的难题。其根本在于解决路桥过渡段的差异沉降。泡沫轻质土作为一种解决路桥过渡段差异沉降的优秀轻质路基填料,面临轻质土台背结构型式不统一、目标密度如何选等问题。基于此,本文基于数值模拟,提出路桥过渡段标准施工工序,从轻质土材料、过渡段结构型式、路基高度和施工期时间四个影响因素出发,以路基容许工后沉降、纵坡率、容许台阶高度三个指标评价路桥过渡段差异沉降。通过研究发现,施工期时间对路基表面工后沉降影响非常大,路基高度、轻质土材料密度对路基表面工后沉降有较大影响,路桥过渡段的基底长度和台阶坡度对路基表面工后沉降影响较小,而轻质土材料的模量对路基表面工后沉降基本无影响。所以在路基填筑高度一定的情况下,可通过合理安排施工期的时间、选择合适的轻质土密度,使路基表面工后沉降能够满足规范要求。
Abstract: The issue of vehicles jumping at bridge approaches in transition sections is becoming increasingly prominent, posing a challenge for highway construction in soft soil areas. The root cause lies in addressing the differential settlement in the road-bridge transition sections. Foam lightweight soil, as an excellent lightweight subgrade filling material to solve the differential settlement in road-bridge transition sections, faces issues such as the lack of uniformity in lightweight soil backfill structural types and how to select target density. Based on this, this paper proposes standard construction procedures for road-bridge transition sections through numerical simulations. It analyzes four influencing factors: lightweight soil material, transition section structural type, subgrade height, and construction period. Three indicators—allowable post-construction settlement of the subgrade, slope rate, and allowable step height—are used to evaluate the differential settlement in road-bridge transition sections. The study found that the construction period has a significant impact on the post-construction settlement of the subgrade surface. Subgrade height and the density of lightweight soil materials also greatly influence the post-construction settlement, while the base length and steep slope of the road-bridge transition section have a smaller effect. The modulus of the lightweight soil material has almost no effect on the post-construction settlement of the subgrade surface. Therefore, under a certain subgrade height, reasonable scheduling of the construction period and selection of appropriate lightweight soil density can ensure that the post-construction settlement of the subgrade surface meets the regulatory requirements.
文章引用:殷明, 张政, 王向南, 荣玉, 王立旗. 基于数值模拟的轻质土路桥过渡段差异沉降分析[J]. 土木工程, 2024, 13(10): 2008-2023. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2024.1310219

参考文献

[1] 周英超. 水泥粉煤灰碎石桩处理桥头跳车效果动静力分析[J]. 施工技术(中英文), 2024, 53(15): 123-128.
[2] 武博强, 武银君. 基于沉降差异评价的水泥搅拌桩处理桥头跳车研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2022, 39(4): 32-40.
[3] 高茂鸿, 王志斌, 王选仓, 等. 水泥搅拌桩处治桥头过渡段路基沉降控制技术研究[J]. 公路, 2023, 68(6): 177-185.
[4] 刘松玉, 周建, 章定文, 等. 地基处理技术进展[J]. 土木工程学报, 2020, 53(4): 93-110.
[5] Cai, Y.Q., Xie, Z.W., Wang, J., et al. (2018) New Approach of Vacuum Preloading with Booster Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PVDs) to Improve Deep Marine Clay Strata. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 55, 1359-1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 胡幼常, 许爱华, 董必昌, 等. 双向土工格栅处理桥头跳车的试验研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2008, 25(6): 50-54.
[7] 孙筠, 项贻强, 唐国斌, 等. 软土地基台后回填EPS轻质混凝土沉降分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2010, 27(7): 46-51.
[8] 杨少华, 胡建福, 曾怀武, 等. 人造轻质土在高等级公路上的应用[J]. 公路, 2006(6): 81-86.
[9] 李英姿. 气泡混合轻质土在加固软土地基中的应用[[J]. 岩土工程界, 2008, 11(4): 66-68.
[10] 陈忠平, 王树林. 气泡混合轻质土及其应用综述[[J]. 中外公路, 2003, 23(5): 117-120.
[11] 陈文平, 谭存茂, 杨和平. 气泡混合轻质土在台背回填施工中的应用[J]. 公路, 2012(11): 162-166.
[12] 李斯, 姚建平, 杨伟利, 等. 高速铁路泡沫轻质土路基帮宽施工关键技术[J]. 铁道建筑, 2020, 60(4): 136-139.
[13] 肖礼经. 泡沫水泥轻质土在公路建设中的应用与研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2003.
[14] 肖礼经. 气泡混合轻质填土技术在解决高等级公路软基路堤桥头跳车问题中的应用[J]. 中外公路, 2003, 23(5): 121-123.
[15] 陈晓光. 基于沉降量和沉降速率控制的黄泛区桥头跳车地基处治技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2017.
[16] Wahls (1998) Design and Construction of Bridge Approach. Transportation Research Board.
[17] 刘彬彬, 曾志姣, 杨晨, 等. 公路下穿既有线新建泡沫轻质土路涵过渡段动力响应特性分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(6): 1577-1584.
[18] 刘晓梁. 高速公路修建过程中的软土地基处理问题[J]. 山西建筑, 2012, 38(10): 162-163.
[19] Long, J.H., Olson, S.M., Stark, T.D., et al. (1998) Differential Movement at Embankment-Bridge Structure Interface in Illinois. Transportation Research Record, 1633, 53-60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 莫健伟. 机械荷载对沥青路面结构损伤机理与处治策略[J]. 四川水泥, 2024(9): 229-232.
[21] 叶见曙, 赖国麟, 蒋爱祥, 等. 宁通一级公路扬江段桥头搭板的调查与分析[J]. 华东公路, 1995(6): 27-30.
[22] 周虎鑫, 陈荣生. 高等级公路工后不均匀沉降指标研究[J]. 东南大学学报, 1996, 26(1): 54-56.
[23] 崔梦璇. 基于舒适性的路桥过渡段差异沉降控制标准研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2010.
[24] 陈景星, 冯忠居, 郑木莲, 等. 基于安全性的路桥过渡段差异沉降控制标准[J]. 公路交通科技, 2013, 30(2): 26-31.
[25] Smith, R.E. and Wahls, H.E. (1969) Consolidation under Constant Rates of Strain. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 95, 519-539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Stark, T.D., Olson, S.M. and Long, J.H. (1995) Differential Movement at the Embankment/Structure Interface: Mitigation and Rehabilitation: Final Project Report.
[27] 鲍明伟, 金太学. 公路桥头台阶的防治[J]. 公路, 1994(5): 20-23.
[28] 交通运输部. 公路技术状况评定标准: JTG 5210-2018 [S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国交通运输部, 2019.
[29] 交通运输部. 公路路基设计规范: JTG D30-2015 [S]. 武汉: 中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司, 2015.