金融数据本地化规制现状检视及其完善
Review and Improvement of Financial Data Localization Regulations
摘要: 随着国际数字贸易发展与数字经济的兴起,金融数据的跨境流动已然成为常态。但为防范金融数据受损,出于保护一国数据主权的考虑,金融数据本地化措施的应用呈现出增长趋势,同时由于其适用在一定程度上遏制了金融数据本身的流动,在国际金融发展中存在着一定的争议。本文从金融数据本地化的规制功能以及价值争议入手,理清其基本概况的前提下分析当今国内外规制状况,在此基础上我国应进一步推进金融数据本地化法律体系的构建,同时尝试在保护数据主权和国家监管前提下一定程度放宽金融数据本地化的限制,最终在总体框架上继续坚持推动金融开放,加强金融行业方面的国际合作。
Abstract: With the development of international digital trade and the rise of the digital economy, the cross-border flow of financial data has become a norm. However, to prevent damage to financial data and protect a country’s data sovereignty, financial data localization measures have been on the rise. While such measures aim to safeguard data, they also restrict the flow of financial data to a certain extent, leading to debates in international financial development. This article begins by examining the regulatory function and value disputes surrounding financial data localization, providing an overview of the current situation. It then analyzes the regulatory landscape both domestically and internationally. On this basis, it argues that China should further advance the construction of its legal framework for financial data localization. At the same time, it should explore ways to relax certain restrictions on financial data localization under the premise of protecting data sovereignty and ensuring national regulatory oversight. Ultimately, the article advocates for continued promotion of financial openness and enhanced international cooperation within the financial sector under the overarching framework.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王孝松, 张雨彤. 世界主要自贸港金融开放路径对海南的启示[J]. 海南金融, 2024(5): 22-31.
|
|
[2]
|
United States International Trade Commission (2017) Global Digital Trade 1: Market Opportunities and Key Foreign Trade Restrictions. https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4716_0.pdf
|
|
[3]
|
Whorra, G. (2022) Data Localization: An Issue beyond Borders. RGNUL Financial and Mercantile Law Review (RFMLR), 43-66.
|
|
[4]
|
Wong, B. (2019) Data Localization and ASEAN Economic Community. Asian Journal of International Law, 10, 158-180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
郭德香. GATS对金融数据本地化措施的规制及中国因应[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 56(4): 43-47.
|
|
[6]
|
毕泗锋. 经济效率理论研究述评[J]. 经济评论, 2008(6): 133-138.
|
|
[7]
|
Ferracane, M. (2017) Restrictions on Cross-Border Data Flows: A Taxonomy. ECIPE Working Paper, 9.
|
|
[8]
|
温树英. 数据本地化要求的困境与对策: 以金融服务贸易为例[J]. 国际经济法学刊, 2021, (2): 14-26.
|
|
[9]
|
美国贸易代表办公室. Chapter 17 Financial Services [EB/OL]. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/FTA/USMCA/Text/17-Financial-Services.pdf, 2024-06-10.
|
|
[10]
|
王春晖. 《网络安全法》六大法律制度解析[J]. 南京邮电大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 37(1): 1-13.
|
|
[11]
|
Hodson, S. (2018) Applying WTO and FTA Disciplines to Data Localization Measures. World Trade Review, 18, 579-607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[12]
|
王远志. 我国银行金融数据跨境流动的法律规制[J]. 金融监管研究, 2020(1): 51-65.
|
|
[13]
|
陈斌彬, 王斌楠. 数据主权视阈下我国数据出境的法律规制及完善[J]. 华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(2): 49-63.
|