跨境电商知识产权侵权争端成因分析及规制设计
Cause Analysis and Regulation Design of Cross-Border E-Commerce Intellectual Property Infringement Disputes
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2024.1341262, PDF,   
作者: 薛 沁:浙江理工大学法政学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 跨境电商知识产权侵权Cross-Border E-Commerce Intellectual Property Infringement
摘要: 跨境电商随着经济全球化与贸易数字化深化而迅猛发展,但同时也面临着风险与挑战。目前中国出口跨境电商具有即时性、虚拟性、风险性、隐匿性、小批量高频次等特点,中国跨境电商防范知识产权法律风险在立法、监管、救济方面存在漏洞,在此基础之上提出我国跨境电商防范侵犯知识产权的对策,以期降低我国跨境电商被起诉的风险,从而促进我国电商健康发展,加强我国在全球电商领域的竞争力。
Abstract: Cross-border e-commerce is developing rapidly with the deepening of economic globalization and trade digitization, but it also faces risks and challenges. At present, China’s cross-border export e-commerce has the characteristics of immediacy, virtuality, risk, concealment and low frequency, etc. China’s cross-border e-commerce has loopholes in legislation, supervision and relief to prevent legal risks of intellectual property rights. On this basis, countermeasures are proposed to prevent intellectual property rights infringement by China’s cross-border e-commerce, so as to reduce the risk of being sued by China’s cross-border e-commerce. In order to promote the healthy development of China’s e-commerce, strengthen China’s competitiveness in the field of global e-commerce.
文章引用:薛沁. 跨境电商知识产权侵权争端成因分析及规制设计[J]. 电子商务评论, 2024, 13(4): 1196-1203. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2024.1341262

参考文献

[1] 易继明. 跨境电商知识产权风险的应对——以中国电商在美被诉为例[J]. 知识产权, 2021(1): 7.
[2] 曾梦倩. 跨境电商语境下商标侵权恶意投诉规制对策建议[J]. 中华商标, 2020(1): 69.
[3] 桑静. 我国跨境贸易电子商务海关监管研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 天津财经大学, 2018.
[4] 张华. 连接纽带抑或依附工具: 转型时期中国行业协会研究文献评述[J]. 社会, 2015(3): 221-240.
[5] 叶秋华, 杨嵩涛. 中美商标法律制度的比较与启示[J]. 现代管理科学, 2014(12): 24-26.
[6] 刘影. 日本知识产权制度的历史考察及启示[J]. 国外社会科学前沿, 2020(1): 33.
[7] 孙益武. 《IRIPS协定》下的禁诉令措施——欧盟诉中国知识产权执法措施案探讨[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2022(4): 123-140.
[8] 刘海峰, 主编. 跨境电商应对商标侵权诉讼实务指南[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020: 106-107.