融合注意力机制和上下文信息的阵风锋检测与识别
Gust Front Detection and Recognition Integrating Attention Mechanism and Context Information
DOI: 10.12677/ccrl.2024.136162, PDF,   
作者: 卢 姁, 王也英, 李一玲:中国人民解放军32021部队,北京;王 曦, 孙国栋, 初奕琦:北京无线电测量研究所,北京
关键词: 阵风锋雷达数据注意力机制上下文信息Gust Front Radar Data Attention Mechanism Context Information
摘要: 阵风锋是一种常见的中小尺度天气现象,其经过常伴有灾害性天气,对生命财产安全构成严重威胁,因此,精确检测与识别阵风锋对于防灾减灾具有重要的现实意义。然而在实际应用中,阵风锋的检测面临着数据稀缺、区域特异性强、传统方法检测效果不佳、形态与位置难以精确识别、以及泛化能力不足等挑战。此外阵风锋的特征不明显,易与其他大气现象混淆,导致高误判率的发生。针对这些问题,本文提出了一种基于深度学习的创新方法。首先,针对传统检测方法的局限性,本文改进了Mask R-CNN模型,并引入了注意力机制和特征融合模块,显著提升了阵风锋的检测精度。其次,本文通过引入径向速度频道信息并设计上下文分支,有效增强了模型对干扰要素的辨别能力,从而降低了误判率。此外,本文构建了基于新一代多普勒天气雷达数据的三维阵风锋数据集,并通过数据增强技术扩充样本量,为阵风锋的深入研究提供了充足的资源。实验结果表明,所提出的方法在提升阵风锋检测与识别准确性方面具有显著优势,为阵风锋的研究及其业务化应用提供了新的理论基础和技术支持。
Abstract: Gust fronts are common mesoscale meteorological phenomena that are frequently accompanied by severe weather events, posing significant threats to life and property. Accurate detection and identification of gust fronts are therefore of critical importance for disaster prevention and mitigation. However, several challenges persist in the detection of gust fronts, including data scarcity, strong regional specificity, suboptimal performance of traditional mathematical methods, difficulties in accurately identifying their shape and location, and limited generalization capability. Moreover, the subtle characteristics of gust fronts often lead to confusion with other atmospheric phenomena, resulting in high false positive rates. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an innovative approach based on deep learning techniques. First, to overcome the limitations of traditional detection methods, we improve the Mask R-CNN model by incorporating an attention mechanism and a feature fusion module, significantly enhancing the detection accuracy of gust fronts. Second, to reduce false positive rates, we introduce radial velocity channel information and design a context branch to strengthen the model’s ability to distinguish between gust fronts and interfering elements. Additionally, we develop a three-dimensional gust front dataset using next-generation Doppler weather radar data and expand the dataset through data augmentation techniques, thereby providing a robust resource for gust front research. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in enhancing the accuracy of gust front detection and identification, offering new perspectives and tools for both research and operational applications in this domain.
文章引用:卢姁, 王也英, 李一玲, 王曦, 孙国栋, 初奕琦. 融合注意力机制和上下文信息的阵风锋检测与识别[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2024, 13(6): 1507-1519. https://doi.org/10.12677/ccrl.2024.136162

参考文献

[1] Cui, X., Chen, M., Qin, R., Li, C. and Han, L. (2023) The Roles of Surface Convergence Line and Upper‐Level Forcing on Convection Initiation Ahead of a Gust Front: A Case Study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 128, e2022JD036921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Smalley, D.J., Bennett, B.J. and Frankel, R. (2005) MIGFA: The Machine Intelligent Gust Front Algorithm for NEXRAD. 32nd Conference on Radar Meteorology, 24-29 October 2005.
https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/96098.pdf
[3] Taylor, J.W. and Brunins, G. (1985) Design of a New Airport Surveillance Radar (ASR-9). Proceedings of the IEEE, 73, 284-289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Zhang, P., Chan, P.W., Doviak, R., et al. (2009) Estimate of Eddy Dissipation Rate Using Spectrum Width Observed by the Hong Kong TDWR Radar. 34th Conference on Radar Meteorology.
https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/155531.pdf
[5] Byers, H.R. and Braham, R.R. (1949) The Thunderstorm: Report of the Thunderstorm Project. US Government Printing Office。
[6] Newton, C.W. (1963) Dynamics of Severe Convective Storms. In: Newton, C.W., Ed., Severe Local Storms, American Meteorological Society, 33-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Fujita, K., Kajikawa, Y., Mori, J. and Sakata, I. (2014) Detecting Research Fronts Using Different Types of Weighted Citation Networks. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 32, 129-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Spiridonov, V., Sampan, T. and Curic, M. (2008) Numerical Simulations of Severe Tropical and Continental Storm.
http://cabernet.atmosfcu.unam.mx/ICCP-2008/abstracts/Program_on_line/Oral_07/Spiridonov_extended_1.pdf
[9] Klingle, D.L., Smith, D.R. and Wolfson, M.M. (1987) Gust Front Characteristics as Detected by Doppler Radar. Monthly Weather Review, 115, 905-918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 付志康, 徐芬, 顾松山. 南京地区夏季雷暴的雷达雷电特征分析[J]. 气象科学, 2010, 30(6): 841-845.
[11] 徐月飞, 赵放, 毛程燕, 王健疆. 基于深度卷积神经网络的阵风锋识别算法[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2020, 39(1): 81-88.
[12] Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R. and Sun, J. (2017) Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39, 1137-1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J. and Wojna, Z. (2016) Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, 27-30 June 2016, 2818-2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Peng, C., Xue, X. and Sun, J. (2018) ExFuse: Enhancing Feature Fusion for Semantic Segmentation. In: Ferrari, V., Hebert, M., Sminchisescu, C. and Weiss, Y., Eds., Computer VisionECCV 2018, Springer, 273-288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Fan, Q., Zhuo, W., Tang, C. and Tai, Y. (2020) Few-Shot Object Detection with Attention-RPN and Multi-Relation Detector. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, 13-19 June 2020, 4012-4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Bleiholder, J. and Naumann, F. (2009) Data fusion. ACM Computing Surveys, 41, 1-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Vu T, Jang H, Pham T X, et al. (2019) Cascade RPN: Delving into High-Quality Region Proposal Network with Adaptive Convolution. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06720
[18] Senhaji, K., Ramchoun, H. and Ettaouil, M. (2020) Training Feedforward Neural Network via Multiobjective Optimization Model Using Non-Smooth l1/2 Regularization. Neurocomputing, 410, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Wei, C. (2022) Mask R-CNN-Oriented Pottery Display and Identification System. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, Article ID: 6288201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Zheng, Z., Wang, P., Liu, W., Li, J., Ye, R. and Ren, D. (2020) Distance-IOU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regression. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34, 12993-13000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 王红艳, 刘黎平, 王改利, 等. 多普勒天气雷达三维数字组网系统开发及应用[J]. 应用气象学报, 2009, 20(2): 214-224.
[22] Torralba, A., Russell, B.C. and Yuen, J. (2010) LabelMe: Online Image Annotation and Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98, 1467-1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] 郑佳锋, 张杰, 朱克云, 等. 天气雷达产品色标改进[J]. 现代雷达, 2013, 35(10): 13-17.
[24] Sheridan, P. (2011) Review of Techniques and Research for Gust Forecasting and Parameterisation. Met Office.
[25] Zhang, Z. and Sabuncu, M. (2018) Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labels. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montréal, 3-8 December 2018, 8792-8802.
[26] Sangari, A. and Sethares, W. (2016) Convergence Analysis of Two Loss Functions in Soft-Max Regression. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 64, 1280-1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef