基于ABAQUS的三段式螺钉的力学性能研究
ABAQUS-Based Study of the Mechanical Properties of Three-Stage Screws
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2024.136528, PDF,   
作者: 胡亚兰, 陈明惠*:上海理工大学,健康科学与工程学院,上海
关键词: 椎弓根螺钉骨质疏松有限元分析生物力学Pedicle Screws Osteoporosis Finite Element Analysis Biomechanics
摘要: 目的:针对骨质疏松症患者在腰椎融合内固定术后出现邻近关节退变、损伤神经血管等并发症的情况,为此本文设计了一款三段式螺钉并通过仿真软件对手术模型进行分析。方法:基于人体腰椎CT数据建立L3~L5腰椎有限元模型,在腰椎模型上分别建立同尺寸的传统椎弓螺钉内固定M1模型和新型螺钉内固定M2模型,模拟人体在屈伸、侧弯和旋转六种生理活动运动状态。分析在不同骨质下三段式螺钉的最大von Mises应力及应力分布情况、不同工况下腰椎模型活动度。结果:在两种骨质情况下,M2模型在前屈、左右侧弯、左右轴向旋转工况下活动度更大,与健康未植入模型更接近;此外,在骨质疏松情况下,M2模型螺钉在前伸、后屈、左右旋转工况下应力峰值较M1模型降低16.56%、4.67%、23.08%、22.44%。结论:在两种骨量下,采用三段式螺钉可以有限避免术后关节活动度过分受限引起的术后并发症;在骨质疏松条件下,使用三段式螺钉固定可以降低椎弓根螺钉的应力峰值,发生断裂的风险更低。
Abstract: Objective: In order to deal with the complications such as degeneration of adjacent joints and damage to neurovascular and so on after lumbar fusion internal fixation in patients with osteoporosis, for this reason, this paper designs a three-stage screw and analyzes the surgical model by simulation software. Methods: A finite element model of L3~L5 lumbar spine was established based on the CT data of human lumbar spine, and M1 model of traditional pedicle screw internal fixation and M2 model of new screw internal fixation of the same size were established on the lumbar spine model to simulate the six physiological activities of the human body in the flexion-extension, lateral bending and rotation movement state. The maximum von Mises stresses and stress distributions of the three-stage screws were analyzed under different bone qualities, as well as the mobility of the lumbar spine model under different working conditions. Results: Under two bone qualities, the M2 model had greater mobility under forward flexion, left and right lateral bending, and left and right axial rotation working conditions, which was closer to the healthy unimplanted model; moreover, under osteoporotic conditions, the peak stresses of the screws in the M2 model under anterior extension, posterior flexion, and left and right rotation working conditions were reduced by 16.56%, 4.67%, 23.08%, and 22.44% compared with that in the M1 model. Conclusion: The use of three-stage screws can limitedly avoid postoperative complications caused by excessive restriction of joint mobility after surgery in both bone volumes; in osteoporotic conditions, the use of three-stage screw fixation can reduce the peak stress value of pedicle screws, and the risk of fracture is lower.
文章引用:胡亚兰, 陈明惠. 基于ABAQUS的三段式螺钉的力学性能研究[J]. 建模与仿真, 2024, 13(6): 5800-5807. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2024.136528

参考文献

[1] 杨文悦, 刘肖珩, 沈阳. 骨质疏松椎弓根螺钉治疗的生物力学进展[J]. 生物医学工程研究, 2020, 39(4): 408-412.
[2] 钱蕾, 欧阳钧. 两种新型椎弓根螺钉固定强度的体外生物力学研究[J]. 医用生物力学, 2021, 36(S1): 22.
[3] 吴龙, 谢成龙, 林仲可. 椎弓根螺钉设计与其生物力学稳定性的研究进展[J]. 脊柱外科杂志, 2019, 17(6): 431-435.
[4] Bokov, A., Bulkin, A., Aleynik, A., Kutlaeva, M. and Mlyavykh, S. (2018) Pedicle Screws Loosening in Patients with Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine: Potential Risk Factors and Relative Contribution. Global Spine Journal, 9, 55-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Weiser, L., Huber, G., Sellenschloh, K., Viezens, L., Püschel, K., Morlock, M.M., et al. (2017) Insufficient Stability of Pedicle Screws in Osteoporotic Vertebrae: Biomechanical Correlation of Bone Mineral Density and Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength. European Spine Journal, 26, 2891-2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Yao, G., Xiao, Z., Xiao, T., Zhong, N., Huang, S., Liu, J., et al. (2022) Development and Biomechanical Test of a New Pedicle Screw for Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery. Medical Engineering & Physics, 104, Article ID: 103808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Kim, K., Song, M., Park, Y., Lee, D. and Kim, D. (2022) Cortical Trajectory Screw Fixation in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of the Existing Literature. Asian Spine Journal, 16, 127-140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 赵宏涛, 杨海胜. 传统与皮质骨轨迹椎弓根螺钉内固定术的生物力学对比[J]. 医用生物力学, 2023, 38(1): 30-36.
[9] Calvert, G.C., Lawrence, B.D., Abtahi, A.M., Bachus, K.N. and Brodke, D.S. (2015) Cortical Screws Used to Rescue Failed Lumbar Pedicle Screw Construct: A Biomechanical Analysis. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 22, 166-172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Lorenz, A., Leichtle, C.I., Frantz, S., Bumann, M., Tsiflikas, I., Shiozawa, T., et al. (2017) Pull out Strength of Dual Outer Diameter Pedicle Screws Compared to Uncemented and Cemented Standard Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical in Vitro Study. Orthopaedic Surgery, 9, 229-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Castro, W.H.M., Halm, H., Jerosch, J., Malms, J., Steinbeck, J. and Blasius, S. (1996) Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Vertebrae. Spine, 21, 1320-1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 郭海威, 谢家豪, 林燕平, 等. 骨水泥强化空心侧孔与常规椎弓根螺钉内固定修复骨质疏松椎体效果及安全性Meta分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2021, 25(30): 4891-4899.
[13] Colman, M., Pond, J., Bachus, K., Lawrence, B.D., Spiker, W.R. and Brodke, D.S. (2017) Fenestrated Screws Augmented with PMMA Increase the Pullout Strength of Sacral Pedicle Screws. Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication, 30, E252-E256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Wong, C., Hu, H., Huang, Y. and Huang, K. (2022) Optimization of Spinal Reconstructions for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures to Prevent Proximal Junctional Complications: A Finite Element Study. Bioengineering, 9, Article No. 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Matsukawa, K., Yato, Y., Imabayashi, H., Hosogane, N., Asazuma, T. and Nemoto, K. (2015) Biomechanical Evaluation of the Fixation Strength of Lumbar Pedicle Screws Using Cortical Bone Trajectory: A Finite Element Study. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 23, 471-478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Polikeit, A., Nolte, L.P. and Ferguson, S.J. (2003) The Effect of Cement Augmentation on the Load Transfer in an Osteoporotic Functional Spinal Unit: Finite-Element Analysis. Spine, 28, 991-996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Kim, H., Kang, K., Chang, B., Lee, C., Kim, J. and Yeom, J.S. (2014) Biomechanical Analysis of Fusion Segment Rigidity upon Stress at both the Fusion and Adjacent Segments: A Comparison between Unilateral and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation. Yonsei Medical Journal, 55, Article No. 1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Lu, T. and Lu, Y. (2019) Comparison of Biomechanical Performance among Posterolateral Fusion and Transforaminal, Extreme, and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis. World Neurosurgery, 129, e890-e899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Huang, Y., Du, C., Cheng, C., Zhong, Z., Chen, X., Wu, G., et al. (2017) Correction: Preserving Posterior Complex Can Prevent Adjacent Segment Disease Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgeries: A Finite Element Analysis. PLOS ONE, 12, e0172329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Shim, C.S., Park, S.W., Lee, S., Lim, T.J., Chun, K. and Kim, D.H. (2008) Biomechanical Evaluation of an Interspinous Stabilizing Device, Locker. Spine, 33, E820-E827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]