重视消费者在元宇宙下商品类似的认定中的作用——以爱马仕诉梅森·罗斯柴尔德案为例
The Role of Consumers in the Identification of Commodity Similarity in Meta-Universe —Taking Hermès v. Mason Rothschild as an Example
摘要: 元宇宙虚实杂糅的特点和NFT商品的虚拟性的特点使得原本客观标准和主观标准存在适用问题的类似商品判断更加困难。实际上回归到商标的本质,就会发现消费者在商标的识别、品质保障、品牌建造的功能发挥以及商品交易过程中发挥着不可替代的作用。爱马仕案重视消费者认知情况的做法为解决这一难题具有启示意义。重视消费者在商品类似性认定中的作用,采用在消费者调查主体范围、调查方法、调查问题上科学合理设计的消费者调查方法能够帮助法官更好的探知消费者对相关商品间类似性的认知情况,更加客观、全面地对元宇宙下商品间类似性进行认定。
Abstract: The characteristics of the meta-universe’s hybridization of reality and the virtual nature of NFT goods make it more difficult to judge similar goods, where the application of objective and subjective standards is originally problematic. In fact, if we return to the essence of trademarks, we will find that consumers play an irreplaceable role in the identification of trademarks, quality assurance, the function of brand building and the process of commodity transactions. The Hermes case is a revelation for solving this problem by emphasizing consumers’ cognitive situation. Attaching importance to the role of consumers in the determination of similarity of goods, and adopting a scientific and reasonable design of consumer survey methods in terms of the scope of consumer survey subjects, survey methods and survey questions can help the judge to better explore the consumer’s cognition of the similarity of related goods, and determine the similarity of goods under the meta-universe in a more objective and comprehensive manner.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
韦稼霖, 朱冬. 体系化思维下混淆在商标侵权判定中的定位[J]. 电子知识产权, 2020(10): 61-72.
|
|
[2]
|
龚才春, 杜振雷, 周华, 等. “元宇宙”的术语定义及相关问题研究[J]. 中国科技术语, 2023, 25(1): 27-35.
|
|
[3]
|
杜颖, 张呈玥. 元宇宙技术背景下商标法律制度的回应[J]. 知识产权, 2023(1): 31-49.
|
|
[4]
|
林云, 刘宁. 论类似商品或服务的认定标准[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 35(5): 110-118.
|
|
[5]
|
董新凯. 商标法适用中消费者认知的价值及其实现[J]. 北方法学, 2023, 17(2): 89-105.
|
|
[6]
|
杜颖. 商标法律制度的失衡及其理性回归[J]. 中国法学, 2015(3): 120-137.
|
|
[7]
|
李东海. 论消费者在商标法上的优越地位[J]. 电子知识产权, 2013(4): 75-81.
|
|
[8]
|
姚鹤徽. 论商标侵权判定中的消费者调查[J]. 电子知识产权, 2015(7): 76-82.
|
|
[9]
|
张爱国. 商标消费者调查的正当性研究——从49份商标侵权纠纷民事判决书谈起[J]. 知识产权, 2011(2): 63-69.
|