电子商务平台经营者“相应的责任”条款法律适用探析
Analysis of the Legal Application of the “Corresponding Responsibility” Clause for Electronic Commerce Platform Operators
摘要: 在《电子商务法》实施之前,电商平台经营者的法律地位和义务在电子商务纠纷中一直存在争议。随着《电子商务法》的出台,电商平台经营者的法律地位得到了明确界定,其承担的法定义务也得到了进一步明确。然而,其中“相应责任”的规定使得电商平台经营者在某些情况下难以准确认定其责任。本文从电商平台经营者的法律地位出发,对其在电子商务纠纷中的法定义务和责任形态进行分析。并探讨电商平台经营者应承担的义务界限,以及在不同情况下应如何履行这些义务。
Abstract: Prior to the implementation of the Electronic Commerce Law, there had been ongoing debate regarding the legal status and obligations of e-commerce platform operators in disputes. With the promulgation of the Law, their legal status was clearly defined, and their statutory obligations were further specified. However, the stipulation of “corresponding responsibilities” made it difficult for e-commerce platform operators to accurately identify their responsibilities in certain situations. This paper analyzes the legal status of e-commerce platform operators and their statutory obligations and responsibilities in disputes, exploring the boundaries of their obligations and how they should fulfill these obligations in different situations.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
徐伟. 网络服务提供者连带责任之质疑[J]. 法学, 2012(5): 83, 84, 89.
|
|
[2]
|
李中原. 不真正连带债务理论的反思与更新[J]. 法学研究, 2011(5): 37-53.
|
|
[3]
|
刘文杰. 网络服务提供者的安全保障义务[J]. 中外法学, 2012(2): 395-410.
|
|
[4]
|
王融. 关于我国《电子商务法》立法定位的思考与建议[J]. 现代电信科技, 2015(2): 33-39.
|
|
[5]
|
叶楷文, 赵泽,张洋. 论《电子商务法》下电子商务的法制化建设[J]. 全球流通经济, 2019(6): 22-24.
|
|
[6]
|
赵鹏. 私人审查的界限——论网络交易平台对用户内容的行政责任[J]. 清华法学, 2016(6): 115-132.
|