IEP在香港的发展:过去与未来
IEP Development in Hong Kong: Past and Future
DOI: 10.12677/AE.2013.35021, PDF, HTML, 下载: 4,115  浏览: 17,907  科研立项经费支持
作者: 曾君兰:香港教育学院特殊教育与辅导学系,香港;王 芾:香港大学教育学院,香港
关键词: 个别教学计划(IEP)有特殊学习需要学生全纳教育Individualized Educational Plan (IEP); Students with Special Educational Needs; Inclusive Education
摘要: 这项研究的目的是:1) 通过对香港学校“个别教学计划”(IEP)的抽样调查,查探现有IEP文件的常见内容;2) 通过IEP问卷的定量分析评核学校行政管理层制定IEP的过程;3) 通过对教师和学校行政管理层的访问,检视IEP实践过程中参与者的经验。研究团队对十一所学校进行了访问,并收回了八十二份询问在职教师对IEP纪录、过程、实践意见的问卷。研究结果显示IEP在香港实施的合作模式、一致性、问责性及效率都有待提高。本文进一步就促进IEP在香港发展提出建议:()增加IEP目标的可衡量性;()使用更有针对性的个别化教学策略;()引入以课程为本的评估模式;()开拓与父母沟通的渠道,令他们在IEP过程中同享表达意见和期望的权利()运用最新科技量化数据管理系统及电子化沟通平台;()为以学生为本的IEP建立个案管理负责人制度。
Abstract: By reviewing available school IEP samples, the study aims to investigate the content of IEP documentation. Furthermore, through a quantitative analysis of IEP questionnaire data with teachers and school administrators, the study also aims to evaluate IEP as a process. Finally, via qualitative interviews with parents, teachers and school administrators, the stakeholders’ experience in IEP practice was investigated. 11 school settings were interviewed and 82 questionnaires were collected from in-service teachers. Results indicated that the IEP implementation in Hong Kong can further be improved in four dimensions: alignment, consistency, accountability and efficiency; and six IEP strategic development goals are suggested: 1) The measurability of IEP objectives need to be improved; 2) The educational strategies should be tailor-made to correspond more specifically to the educational goals and objectives; 3) More curriculum-based assessment measures should be used to provide evidence-based reference for educational plan development; 4) Communication channels for parents to share their feedback and expectations need to be made available; 5) The employment of information technological techniques such as the adoption of digitalized data management system and communication platform should be optimized; 6) Last but not least, the establishment of a case- manager system for every student-specific IEP should be reinforced.
文章引用:曾君兰, 王芾. IEP在香港的发展:过去与未来[J]. 教育进展, 2013, 3(5): 111-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AE.2013.35021

参考文献

[1] Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (2004) Building the legacy: IDEA 2004. http://idea.ed.gov/
[2] Social Welfare Department (SWD) (2011) Social welfare services in figures. http://www.swd.gov.hk/doc/res_stat/swd%20in%20fig2012_21x10cm%20(4%20row)%20(with%20cover).pdf
[3] Education Bureau (2006) Operational manual for pre-primary institutions. http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/edu-system/preprimary-kindergarten/about-preprimary-kindergarten/Operation%20Mannal_en g.pdf
[4] Equal Opportunities Commission (2001) Disability discrimination ordinance, code of practice on education. Government Printer, Hong Kong.
[5] Education Bureau (2010) Operational guide on the whole school approach to integrated education. http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeID=7348&langno=1
[6] Education Bureau (2011) List of schools participating in New Funding Mode 2007/08. http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/edu-system/special/resources/serc/nfm0708_eng.pdf
[7] Forlin, C. and Rose, R. (2010) Authentic school partnerships for enabling inclusive education in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 10, 13-22.
[8] Education Bureau (2007) Whole-school approach to integrated education. http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeID=7348&langno=1
[9] Equal Opportunities Commission (2012) Study on equal learning opportunities for students with disabilities under the integrated education system—Executive summary. Government Prin- ter, Hong Kong.
[10] Jung, L.A. (2007) Writing SMART objectives and strategies that fit the ROUTINE. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 54-58.
[11] Jung, L., Gomez, C., Baird, S.M. and Keramides, C.L.G. (2008) Designing intervention plans: Bridging the gap between Individualized Education Programs and implementations. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41, 26-33.
[12] Kowalski, E., McCall, R., Aiello, R. and Liberman, L. (2009) Effectively using IEP goal banks. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance, 80, 44-48.
[13] Wilczynski, S.M., Menousek, K., Hunter, M. and Mudgal, D. (2007) Individualized education programs for youth with autism spectrum disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 653-666.
[14] Mechling, L.C. (2007) Assistive technology as a self-management tool for prompting students with intellectual disabilities to initiate and complete daily tasks. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 252-269.
[15] Milsom, A., Goodnough, G. and Akos, P. (2007) School counselor contributions to the individualized education program (IEP) process. Preventing School Failure, 52, 19-24.
[16] Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J.E. and Bolt, S. (2010) Assessment in special and inclusive education. 11th Edition, Wadsworth, Bel-mont.
[17] Hoover, J.J. (2009) RTI assessment essentials for struggling learners. Corwin, Thousand Oaks.
[18] Stecker, P.M., Lembke, E.S. and Foegen, A. (2008) Using progress-monitoring data to improve instructional decision making. Preventing School Failure, 52, 48-58.
[19] Gartin, B.C. and Murdick, N.L. (2005) IDEA 2004: The IEP. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 327-331.
[20] Johns, B.H., Crowley, E.P. and Guetzloe, E. (2002) Programming the IEP for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34, 1-12.
[21] Fisher, M. and Meyer, L.H. (2002) Development and social competence after two years for students enrolled in inclusive and self-contained educational programs. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27, 165-174.
[22] Ketterlin-Geller, L.R., Alonzo, J., Braun-Monegan, J. and Tindal, G. (2007) Recommendations for accommodations: Implications of (in) consistency. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 194- 206.
[23] Yell, M.L., Drasgow, E. and Lowrey, K.A. (2005) No Child Left Behind and students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disorders, 20, 130-139.
[24] Etscheidt, S. and Curran, C.M. (2010) Peer-reviewed research and individualized education programs (IEPs): An examination of intent and impact. Exceptionality, 18, 138-150.
[25] Tsang, K.L.Vicky, Chow, K.F., Lee, K.M. and Tse Andrew, C.Y. (2013) An inclusive assessment model for students with intellectual disabilities—Rasch validation of the SCALE measure. Educationia Confab, 2, 14-29. http://www.confabjournals.com/confabjournals
[26] 曾君兰, 谢宗义, 李启明 (2013) 以全纳课程为本的香港融通学习成效量表(SCALE)之等级量尺分析检视. 教育进展, 3, 41-50. http://www.hanspub.org/journal/ae.html
[27] Education Bureau (2009) Learning progression framework (LPF). http://334.edb.hkedcity.net/doc/eng/SLS8_Forlin_090618.pdf
[28] De Fur, S., Todd-Allen, M. and Getzel, L. (2001) Parent participation in the transition planning process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 71-88.
[29] Thoma, C.A., Rogan, P. and Baker, S.R. (2001) Student involvement in transition planning: Unheard voices. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 16-26.