响应面法优化纳豆银杏叶丹参软胶囊的制备工艺
Optimization of the Preparation Process for Natto-Ginkgo Biloba-Salvia Soft Capsules Using Response Surface Methodology
摘要: 为优化纳豆银杏叶丹参软胶囊的制备工艺,提升产品有效成分溶出率与制剂稳定性,采用单因素实验结合Box-Behnken响应面法开展研究。以纳豆粉、银杏叶提取物、丹参提取物为核心原料,选取原料配比、聚乙二醇400添加量、压制温度为关键影响因素,以综合评分为响应值,考察各因素对制剂质量的影响。结果表明:最优制备工艺参数为原料配比2.5:2.2:1 (g:g:g)、聚乙二醇400添加量16%、压制温度30℃,在此条件下制备的软胶囊综合评分为92.3分,其中纳豆激酶活性达1280 IU/粒、总黄酮溶出率为91.5%、硬度为78 N;验证实验结果与模型预测值偏差小于2%,表明该模型拟合性良好,工艺参数稳定可靠,可为纳豆银杏叶丹参软胶囊的工业化生产提供技术支撑。
Abstract: To optimize the preparation process of Natto-Ginkgo Biloba-Salvia soft capsules and improve the dissolution rate of active ingredients and formulation stability, a study was conducted using single-factor experiments combined with Box-Behnken response surface methodology. Using natto powder, Ginkgo biloba extract, and Salvia miltiorrhiza extract as the core materials, the material ratio, PEG-400 addition amount, and soft capsule sealing temperature were selected as key influencing factors. A comprehensive evaluation score was used as the response value to systematically investigate the effects of these factors on the formulation quality. The results indicated the optimal preparation parameters as follows: material ratio of 2.5:2.2:1 (g:g:g), PEG-400 addition amount of 16%, and sealing temperature of 30˚C. Under these conditions, the soft capsules achieved a comprehensive score of 92.3 points, with nattokinase activity reaching 1280 IU/capsule, total flavonoid dissolution rate of 91.5%, and hardness of 78 N. The deviation between the verification experiment results and the model predictions was less than 2%, indicating good model fit and stable, reliable process parameters. This study provides technical support for the industrial production of Natto-Ginkgo Biloba-Salvia soft capsules.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
屈家亮, 柳惠平, 张佑红. 纳豆激酶研究进展[J]. 武汉工程大学学报, 2024, 46(5): 527-533.
|
|
[2]
|
Shahrin, A., Mele, M.A., et al. (2024) Health Benefits and Future Perspectives of Ginkgo Biloba. Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences, 6, 45-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[3]
|
Zhang, Y., Xin, G., Zhou, Q., et al. (2024) Elucidating the Distinctive Regulatory Effects and Mechanisms of Active Compounds in Salvia Miltiorrhiza Bunge via Network Pharmacology: Unveiling Their Roles in the Modulation of Platelet Activation and Thrombus Formation. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 484, Article 116871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[4]
|
Wei, B., Sun, C., Wan, H., et al. (2023) Bioactive Components and Molecular Mechanisms of Salvia Miltiorrhiza Bunge in Promoting Blood Circulation to Remove Blood Stasis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 317, Article 116697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[5]
|
Weremfo, A., Abassah‐Oppong, S., Adulley, F., et al. (2022) Response Surface Methodology as a Tool to Optimize the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Plant Sources. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 103, 26-36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[6]
|
李迪文, 洪辅安, 库晨锋, 等. 响应面法优化纳豆激酶肠溶胶囊的制备工艺[J]. 武汉工程大学学报, 2025, 47(1): 53-58.
|
|
[7]
|
中国药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典(2020年版, 一部) [S]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020.
|
|
[8]
|
Jiménez, D.M., Cárdenas, Z.J. and Martínez, F. (2016) Solubility and Solution Thermodynamics of Sulfadiazine in Polyethylene Glycol 400 + Water Mixtures. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 216, 239-245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|