索引的污渍与黑洞——齐泽克屏幕理论视域下金波特的身份悖论
The Stain and the Black Hole of the Index—The Identity Paradox of Kinbote through the Lens of Žižek’s Screen Theory
DOI: 10.12677/wls.2026.141006, PDF,   
作者: 韩 寒:四川大学外国语学院,四川 成都
关键词: 《微暗的火》金波特索引屏幕理论可能世界模型Pale Fire Kinbote Index Screen Theory Possible Worlds Model
摘要: 纳博科夫的小说《微暗的火》由四个部分构成,分别为前言、“微暗的火”(一首四个篇章的长诗)、评注和索引。依据希碧尔·谢德、哥尔斯华斯等小说重要人物在评注者金波特编纂的索引中如同污渍被涂抹和如同黑洞般缺位的文本现象,结合可能世界模型与齐泽克对真实/实在界在视觉建构方式上形成的屏幕理论,论证索引作为现实与实在界之间、维护金波特身份的典型屏幕,暴露了金波特没有他声称的重要性、没有结构作用、没有评注权威甚至金波特并不存在的身份悖论。
Abstract: Vladimir Nabokov’s novel Pale Fire consists of four parts: a Foreword, the poem “Pale Fire” (a long poem in four cantos), a Commentary, and an Index. Based on the textual phenomenon whereby key characters in the novel, such as Sybil Shade and Gradus, are either smeared like a stain or absent like a black hole within the Index compiled by the commentator Kinbote, this paper combines the possible worlds model with Slavoj Žižek’s screen theory—which concerns the visual construction of the Real/the Real—to argue that the Index, as a typical screen between reality and the Real that upholds Kinbote’s identity, exposes the paradox of his identity: he lacks the importance he claims, serves no structural function, possesses no authoritative stance as a commentator, and may not even exist.
文章引用:韩寒. 索引的污渍与黑洞——齐泽克屏幕理论视域下金波特的身份悖论[J]. 世界文学研究, 2026, 14(1): 39-45. https://doi.org/10.12677/wls.2026.141006

参考文献

[1] Stark, J. (1974) The Literature of Exhaustion. Duke University Press.
[2] 王安. 《微暗的火》的黑格尔辩证法解读[J]. 英美文学研究论丛, 2015(1): 163-176.
[3] 陈冬秀. 镜像中的叙述者及其意识形态——纳博科夫《微暗的火》的叙述者问题[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010(3): 126-129.
[4] Page, N. (1982) Nabokov: The Critical Heritage. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[5] 尉光吉. 停留在表面: 齐泽克的屏幕理论[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2017, 37(5): 172-179.
[6] Ryan, M. (2006) From Parallel Universes to Possible Worlds: Ontological Pluralism in Physics, Narratology, and Narrative. Poetics Today, 27, 633-674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 黄艺聪. 越界的叙事者——《微暗的火》中的可能世界模型[J]. 国外文学, 2016(2): 118-126, 159.
[8] Žižek, S. (1991) Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. MIT Press.
[9] Žižek, S. (2008) The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso.
[10] Hatchuel, M. and Porson, S. (2013) Law’s Contagious Whisper: Censorship, Courtesy, and the Legal Paratext. James Joyce Quarterly, 50, 681-698.
[11] 纳博科夫. 微暗的火[M]. 梅绍武, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2019.
[12] Žižek, S. (1994) The Spectre of Ideology. In: Žižek, S., Ed., Mapping Ideology, Verso, 1-33.
[13] Žižek, S. (2005) Interrogating the Real. Bloomsbury.
[14] Kudryashov, I.A., Ryabko, O.P. and Grigoryeva, N.O. (2024) Unreliable Narrator and Its Pragmatic Effects in V. V. Nabokov’s “Pale Fire”. Nauchnyi dialog, 13, 273-291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 李小均. 火焰为何微暗?——从文本结构管窥《微暗的火》的意义[J]. 国外文学, 2008(2): 70-77.