后殖民生态批评视角下《悲伤之角》的动物书写
Animal Writing in Horn of Sorrow from a Postcolonial Ecocritical Perspective
摘要: 《悲伤之角》以小犀牛Thembalethu的成长悲剧，展现在人类活动影响下非洲犀牛的悲惨命运。本文从后殖民生态批评视角出发，并引入福柯的“权力话语”理论与非人类中心主义视角，深入剖析作品中的动物书写，揭示生态问题与权力关系的复杂交织，也映射人类权力的滥用与动物反抗的制衡。剧本通过其动物叙事，有力地批判了人类中心主义，并为构建多元物种共生的生态伦理提供了文学范本，这对当代生态保护与社会发展具有深刻的理论启示与现实意义。
Abstract: Horn of Sorrow portrays the tragic fate of African rhinoceroses under the impact of human activities through the growth tragedy of the young rhino Thembalethu. Drawing on a postcolonial ecocritical perspective, and incorporating Foucault’s theory of “power discourse” together with a non-anthropocentric viewpoint, this paper conducts an in-depth analysis of the work’s animal writing. It uncovers the complex entanglement between ecological issues and power relations, reflecting both the abuse of human power and the counter-balancing resistance of animals. Through its animal narrative, the play powerfully critiques anthropocentrism and offers a literary model for constructing an ecological ethic of multispecies coexistence, providing profound theoretical insights and practical significance for contemporary ecological conservation and social development.
文章引用：王欢. 后殖民生态批评视角下《悲伤之角》的动物书写 [J]. 世界文学研究, 2026, 14(1): 57-63. https://doi.org/10.12677/wls.2026.141008

参考文献

[1] Huggan, G. and Tiffin, H. (2010) Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. Routledge, 4, 56, 135-137.
[2] 姜礼福. 后殖民生态批评: 起源、核心概念以及构建原则[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 16(2): 55-59.
[3] Ellenbogen, N. (1988) Horn of Sorrow. In: Drama for a New South Africa, Indiana University Press, 80-91.
[4] 章海荣. 生态伦理与生态美学[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2005: 217.
[5] Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. Pantheon Books, 109-133.
[6] 姜礼福, 孟庆粉. 西方后殖民生态批评述评[J]. 外国语文, 2013, 29(3): 27-31.
[7] Appiah, K.A. and Gutmann, A. (1996) Color Conscious: The Political Morality of Race. Princeton University Press, 54.
[8] 张学甲. “面纱”下的帝国想象: 后殖民生态批评视角下的《面纱》[J]. 世界文学评论(高教版), 2025(1): 71-75.
[9] 贾学军. 生态帝国主义: 本质、表现与启示[J]. 前沿, 2017(11): 66-72, 83.
[10] 陶静. 人类世的映射: 《圆屋》动物书写中的后殖民生态政治隐喻[J]. 宁波开放大学学报, 2025, 23(2): 96-101.
[11] 陈涵平, 熊国华. 论生态批评对比较文学的理论启示[J]. 广西社会科学, 2008(12): 140.
[12] Laurence, B. (2001) Writing for an Endangered World. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 3.
[13] Taylor, P.W. (2010) Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Capital Normal University Press, 72-73.
[14] 朱新福, 张慧荣. 后殖民生态批评述略[J]. 当代外国文学, 2011, 32(4): 24-30.
[15] 张兰. 后殖民生态视角下的《等待野蛮人》[J]. 安康学院学报, 2016, 28(5): 82.
[16] 苗福光. 后殖民生态批评: 后殖民研究的绿色[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2015, 35(2): 200.

为你推荐