基于“作者–文本–读者”框架的叙事共情理论研究发展:一项认知诗学领域的元整合分析
Narrative Empathy Theory in Cognitive Poetics: A Meta-Synthesis of Its Development Through the “Author-Text-Reader” Framework
摘要: 自2006年“叙事共情”理论被提出以来,该议题在认知诗学与文学实证研究中日益受到关注,然而现有研究成果零散,缺乏对理论验证、研究方法与核心争议三方面的系统性整合。为此,本文首先系统梳理叙事共情假设,进而构建一个“作者–文本–读者”三元分析框架,并以该框架为基础,通过元整合法对2006-2024年间发表的26项相关研究进行系统梳理。研究发现:理论验证呈多维但不均衡的态势,集中于“读者–文本”互动,而“读者–文本”维度关注不足;方法论上多采用“文本分析–实证检验”路径,但对读者个体差异的量化以及共情本身的定性分析仍存在挑战;核心争议则围绕文类差异与前景化手法展开,揭示了共情机制的语境依赖性。本文系统整合了该领域的理论验证脉络和方法实践,旨在为推动叙事共情理论在中国本土语境下的创新应用提供清晰参考。
Abstract: Since the “narrative empathy” theory was proposed in 2006, this topic has garnered increasing attention within cognitive poetics and empirical literary studies. However, existing research findings in this area remain fragmented, lacking a systematic integration of theoretical validations, research methodologies, and core debates. Based on hypotheses on narrative empathy, this paper constructs an “author-text-reader” tripartite analytical framework and employs a meta-synthesis method to systematically review 26 relevant studies published between 2006 and 2024. The study finds that theoretical validation demonstrates multidimensional yet uneven development, primarily concentrating on “reader-text” interactions while paying insufficient attention to the “author-reader” dimension. Methodologically, studies predominantly adopt a “textual analysis-empirical testing” approach, yet challenges persist in quantifying individual reader differences and qualitatively analyzing empathy itself. Core debates revolve around genre differences and foregrounding techniques, revealing the context-dependent nature of the empathy mechanism. This paper systematically integrates the theoretical validation trajectories and methodological practices within the field, aiming to provide a clear reference for promoting the innovative application of narrative empathy theory within the Chinese context.
文章引用:荣榕, 李梦凡. 基于“作者–文本–读者”框架的叙事共情理论研究发展:一项认知诗学领域的元整合分析 [J]. 世界文学研究, 2026, 14(1): 97-111. https://doi.org/10.12677/wls.2026.141014

参考文献

[1] Gavins, J. (2007) Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
[2] Stockwell, P. (2020) Texture—A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh University Press.
[3] Keen, S. (2006) A Theory of Narrative Empathy. Narrative, 14, 207-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Keen, S. (2014) Narrative Empathy. In: Hühn, P., et al., Eds., The Living Handbook of Narratology, De Gruyter, 521-530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Keen, S. (2007) Empathy and the Novel. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 李克, 李淑康. 生态话语中转喻的叙事共情研究[J]. 中国外语, 2025, 22(4): 37-42.
[7] 仝宇光, 李颖, 陈杰. 有温度的阅读: 共情在文本阅读中的加工机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(11): 2025-2039.
[8] 李克. 叙事共情的修辞机制[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2022, 45(6): 12-20.
[9] Ortega, L. and Norris, J.M. (2006) Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching.
[10] Bourget, J. (2023) From Witness to Accomplice: The Manipulation of Readers’ Empathy through Consciousness Representation in Patricia Highsmith’s The Talented Mr Ripley. Journal of Literary Semantics, 52, 145-161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Nuttall, L. (2015) Attributing Minds to Vampires in Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 24, 23-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Karpenko-Seccombe, T. (2023) “The Unlikeliest Twins”: The Role of Intertextual Foregrounding and Defamiliarisation in Creating Empathy in Meursault, Contre-Enquête. Journal of Literary Semantics, 52, 191-212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] de Jonge, J., Demichelis, S., Rebora, S. and Salgaro, M. (2022) Operationalizing Perpetrator Studies. Focusing Readers’ Reactions to the Kindly Ones by Jonathan Littell. Journal of Literary Semantics, 51, 147-161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Keen, S. (2011) Empathetic Hardy: Bounded, Ambassadorial, and Broadcast Strategies of Narrative Empathy. Poetics Today, 32, 349-389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Mansworth, M. (2022) The Restricted Possible Worlds of Depression: A Stylistic Analysis of Janice Galloway’s The Trick Is to Keep Breathing Using a Possible Worlds Framework. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 32, 28-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Harrison, M. (2011) How Narrative Relationships Overcome Empathic Bias: Elizabeth Gaskell’s Empathy across Social Difference. Poetics Today, 32, 255-288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Rokotnitz, N. (2017) Goosebumps, Shivers, Visualization, and Embodied Resonance in the Reading Experience: The God of Small Things. Poetics Today, 38, 273-293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] von Mossner, A.W. (2019) Why We Care about (Non) Fictional Places: Empathy, Character, and Narrative Environment. Poetics Today, 40, 559-577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Kuzmičová, A., Mangen, A., Støle, H. and Begnum, A.C. (2017) Literature and Readers’ Empathy: A Qualitative Text Manipulation Study. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 26, 137-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Miall, D.S. (2011) Emotions and the Structuring of Narrative Responses. Poetics Today, 32, 323-348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Kuzmičová, A. and Bálint, K. (2019) Personal Relevance in Story Reading: A Research Review. Poetics Today, 40, 429-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Neveux, J. (2023) I Fucking Love You! Emotional Address in fleabag, or How Viewers’ Empathy Becomes Voyeurism. Journal of Literary Semantics, 52, 213-232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. (2020) Textual and Reader Factors in Narrative Empathy: An Empirical Reader Response Study Using Focus Groups. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 29, 124-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Morgan, B. (2017) Embodied Cognition and the Project of the Bildungsroman: Wilhelm Meisters Apprenticeship and Daniel Deronda. Poetics Today, 38, 341-362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef