土壤重金属浸出实验模拟与模型拟合研究进展——从动力学机制到水文地球化学耦合模型
Advances in Experimental Simulation and Model Fitting of Soil Heavy Metal Leaching—From Kinetic Mechanisms to Hydrogeochemical Coupling Models
摘要: 土壤重金属污染的环境风险管控与修复,需精准量化重金属在土壤中的浸出迁移行为,现有研究在实验方法标准化、多过程耦合模型构建及实验室向现场推理方面仍存在瓶颈。梳理了批次浸出、柱浸、连续流动浸出等实验方法体系,剖析了重金属浸出的动力学机制、非饱和土壤水动力学传输方程与水地球化学耦合模型的理论框架,对比了不同模型的适用边界与性能局限。pH、液固比是调控重金属浸出行为的核心环境参数,伪二级动力学模型能够较好描述化学吸附主导的浸出过程,HP1、PHREEQC等耦合模型在多组分反应迁移模拟中具显著优势,机器学习与物理模型的融合为复杂场景下的浸出预测提供了新的技术路径。研究成果可为土壤重金属浸出行为的精准模拟、污染风险评估与修复方案优化提供系统的理论支撑与方法参考。
Abstract: The environmental risk management and remediation of soil heavy metal contamination require accurate quantification of the leaching and transport behavior of heavy metals in soils. Current research still faces bottlenecks in the standardization of experimental methods, the construction of multi-process coupled models, and the extrapolation from laboratory to field conditions. This paper reviews experimental method systems including batch leaching, column leaching, and continuous-flow leaching, analyzes the kinetic mechanisms of heavy metal leaching, the theoretical framework of unsaturated soil water dynamics and transport equations and coupled hydrogeochemical models, and compares the applicability boundaries and performance limitations of different models. pH and liquid-to-solid ratio are key environmental parameters regulating the leaching behavior of heavy metals. The pseudo-second-order kinetic model can effectively describe the leaching process dominated by chemisorption. Coupled models such as HP1 and PHREEQC exhibit significant advantages in multicomponent reactive transport simulation. The integration of machine learning with physical models provides a new technical pathway for leaching prediction under complex scenarios. The findings can provide systematic theoretical support and methodological reference for the precise simulation of soil heavy metal leaching behavior, contamination risk assessment, and optimization of remediation strategies.
文章引用:刘志川. 土壤重金属浸出实验模拟与模型拟合研究进展——从动力学机制到水文地球化学耦合模型[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(6): 905-915. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.166082

参考文献

[1] 陈维孝. 晴隆锑矿区锑的释放及其在岩溶地下河中的水文地球化学行为研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2023.
[2] 中华人民共和国环境保护部. 固体废物 浸出毒性浸出方法 水平振荡法: HJ 557-2010 [S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2010.
[3] 王振坤, 孙鑫, 臧世阳, 等. 矿产品中污染物溶出方法及溶出特征的研究进展[J]. 理化检验(化学分册), 2013, 49(2): 247-252.
[4] Rennert, T., Meißner, S., Rinklebe, J. and Totsche, K.U. (2009) Dissolved Inorganic Contaminants in a Floodplain Soil: Comparison of in Situ Soil Solutions and Laboratory Methods. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 209, 489-500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 纪东如, 钱建平, 张璇, 等. 模拟降雨淋洗对土壤重金属释放规律的研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2024, 46(7): 927-932 + 940.
[6] Liu, P., Wang, P., Lu, Y., Ding, Y., Lu, G., Dang, Z., et al. (2019) Modeling Kinetics of Heavy Metal Release from Field-Contaminated Soils: Roles of Soil Adsorbents and Binding Sites. Chemical Geology, 506, 187-196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 常春英, 曹浩轩, 陶亮, 等. 固化/稳定化修复后土壤重金属稳定性及再活化研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(4): 682-691.
[8] 马纪龙, 潘舒昕, 李帅蓓, 等. 基于室内土柱模拟的闽南花岗岩风化土壤中铊淋溶释放特征[J/OL]. 生态学杂志, 1-10.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/21.1148.Q.20260129.1254.016, 2026-05-06.
[9] 蒋旭光, 段茵, 吕国钧, 等. 垃圾焚烧飞灰中重金属固化稳定机理及系统评价方法的研究进展[J]. 环境工程学报, 2022, 16(1): 10-19.
[10] Barna, R., Fernandez, A. and Hlavackova, P. (2007) Assessment Methodologies for Copper and Zinc Mobility in a Neutral Synthetic Soil: The Influence of Ph. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 306, 56-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 林心怡. 硅酸根与重金属阴离子在针铁矿表面的竞争吸附研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 中南民族大学, 2024.
[12] 方华祥. 溶液性质对金属纳米颗粒在多孔介质中迁移持留行为的影响机制研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2017.
[13] 张桓荣. 矿区土壤重金属污染研究现状及赋存特性综述[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2024, 14(9): 1192-1199.
[14] Yong, R.N., Galvez-Cloutier, R. and Phadungchewit, Y. (1993) Selective Sequential Extraction Analysis of Heavy-Metal Retention in Soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 30, 834-847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Cui, Y. and Weng, L. (2015) Interpretation of Heavy Metal Speciation in Sequential Extraction Using Geochemical Modelling. Environmental Chemistry, 12, 163-173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Qiao, H.T., Zhao, B.W. and Yu, X.S. (2022) Effects of Chelating Surfactants on Competitive Adsorption of Lead and Zinc on Loess Soil. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 21, 703-710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Du, S., Wang, X., Zhang, T. and Ding, C. (2019) Kinetic Characteristics and Predictive Models of Methylmercury Production in Paddy Soils. Environmental Pollution, 253, 424-428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Tipping, E. and Filella, M. (2019) Estimation of WHAM7 Constants for GaIII, InIII, SbIII and BIIII from Linear Free Energy Relationships, and Speciation Calculations for Natural Waters. Environmental Chemistry, 17, 140-147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Wang, P., Ding, Y., Liu, M., Liang, Y. and Shi, Z. (2019) Modeling Kinetics of Ni Dissociation from Humic Substances Based on WHAM 7. Chemosphere, 221, 254-262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Michel, K. and Ludwig, B. (2005) Modelling of Seepage Water Composition from Experiments with an Acid Soil and a Calcareous Sediment. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, 33, 595-604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Yi, G., Zou, D., Chen, K., Deng, Y. and Tian, S. (2026) A Novel Solution for Richards’ Equation Based on Scaled Boundary Finite Element Method. Computers and Geotechnics, 196, Article 108167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 罗杰, 刘本华, 徐晶, 等. Hydrus-1D软件模拟污染土壤重金属溶质运移[J]. 济南大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 37(4): 444-448.
[23] Gao, H., Koopmans, G.F., Song, J., Groenenberg, J.E., Liu, X., Comans, R.N.J., et al. (2022) Evaluation of Heavy Metal Availability in Soils near Former Zinc Smelters by Chemical Extractions and Geochemical Modelling. Geoderma, 423, Article 115970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Fangfang, M., Yimei, Z., Yu, L., et al. (2022) A Synthetic Health Risk Assessment Based on Geochemical Equilibrium Simulation and Grid Spatial Interpolation for Zinc (II) Species. Journal of Environmental Management, 304, Article 114207.
[25] Michel, K., Roose, M. and Ludwig, B. (2007) Comparison of Different Approaches for Modelling Heavy Metal Transport in Acidic Soils. Geoderma, 140, 207-214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Dijkstra, J.J., Meeussen, J.C.L. and Comans, R.N.J. (2004) Leaching of Heavy Metals from Contaminated Soils: An Experimental and Modeling Study. Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 4390-4395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] 胡佳雪, 李佩, 宋世虹, 等. 基于PMF和XGBoost-SHAP模型的矿区周边稻田土壤重金属污染源与驱动因素分析[J/OL]. 环境工程学报: 1-12.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.5591.X.20260409.1408.006, 2026-05-05.
[28] 任晓松, 邢邦彦, 高彩虹, 等. 基于XGBoost-SHAP的中国城市减污降碳协同增效时空特征及影响因素[J/OL]. 环境工程技术学报: 1-14.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.5972.x.20260429.0909.002, 2026-05-05.
[29] 张彤, 刘仁宇, 王培晓, 等. 感知物理先验的机器学习及其在地理空间智能中的研究前景[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2023, 25(7): 1297-1311.
[30] Usoh, G.A., Ahaneku, I.E., Ugwu, E.C., Sam, E.O., Itam, D.H., Alaneme, G.U., et al. (2023) Mathematical Modeling and Numerical Simulation Technique for Selected Heavy Metal Transport in MSW Dumpsite. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 5674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] 李策. 基于地质熵的裂隙网络非均匀渗流规律数值分析研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2025.
[32] 龙云利, 徐晖, 安玮. 马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛重要度采样与多目标跟踪[J]. 控制与决策, 2011, 26(9): 1402-1406.
[33] Yaseen, Z.M., Hameed, M.M. and Doost, Z.H. (2025) Validation of Machine Learning Models for Heavy Metals Bioavailability Prediction: A Comparative Study. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 13, Article 116749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] 汪先国. 多场耦合视角下深基坑降水数值模拟研究进展及模型适用性分析[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2025, 23(2): 89-97.