老旧小区原拆原建居民出资机制研究——以杭州市浙工新村为例
Research on Resident Investment Mechanism for In-Situ Demolition and Reconstruction of Old Residential Neighborhoods—A Case Study of Zhegong New Village, Hangzhou
摘要: 原拆原建式更新已成为提升老旧小区居住品质的重要路径,其成功的关键在于建立合理可行的居民出资机制。通过对杭州市浙工新村的案例研究,剖析了“改造费 + 扩面费”居民出资方式在更新收益分配上的结构性不公,即大户型居民以低成本获取大部分土地增值,小户型居民因支付能力有限只能分享较少更新红利。为解决此困境,本文提出了“综合成本价 + 土地权益调节”这一新的出资机制。分析表明,通过统一建筑成本价和建立土地权益量化补偿机制,有效实现了土地增值的显性化与再分配,显著提升了原有不同住宅面积居民的利益分配的均衡性,真正体现“谁受益、谁出资”原则。该机制在划拨土地背景下具备良好适应性,为构建可复制可推广的居民出资机制提供了借鉴。
Abstract: In-situ Demolition and Reconstruction has become an important path to improve the living quality of old residential districts, and the key to its success lies in establishing a reasonable and feasible residential funding mechanism. Through a case study of Zhegong New Village in Hangzhou, this paper analyzes the structural injustice in the distribution of renewal benefits of the “renovation fee + area expansion fee” residential funding method, that is, residents with large-sized apartments obtain most of the land value increment at a low cost, while residents with small-sized apartments can only share less renewal dividends due to limited payment capacity. To solve this dilemma, this paper proposes a new funding mechanism of “comprehensive cost price + land rights adjustment”. The analysis shows that by unifying the construction cost price and establishing a quantitative compensation mechanism for land rights, the quantification and redistribution of land value increment are effectively realized, the balance of interest distribution among residents with different original residential areas is significantly improved, and the principle of “who benefits, who pays” is truly reflected. This mechanism has good adaptability under the background of allocated land, and provides a reference for constructing a replicable and promotable residential funding mechanism.
文章引用:杨君豪, 程正中, 张迈, 李云青. 老旧小区原拆原建居民出资机制研究——以杭州市浙工新村为例[J]. 城镇化与集约用地, 2026, 14(3): 238-247. https://doi.org/10.12677/ulu.2026.143022

参考文献

[1] 卢文正, 仇保兴, 陈杰. 中国城镇老旧小区改造的自主更新实践与启示[J]. 中国房地产金融, 2025(4): 15-21.
[2] 蒋青, 苏义坤. 改造老旧小区居民出资意愿影响因素研究[J]. 中国房地产, 2022(8): 51-57.
[3] 冉奥博, 刘佳燕. “责任-权利”视角下老旧小区改造资金共担机制研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2025, 32(5): 126-132.
[4] 尹贝贝, 张晓楠. 城市更新背景下老旧小区改造中的协同治理机制[J]. 住宅与房地产, 2025(28): 75-77.
[5] 徐鑫. 基于可持续发展目标的老旧小区改造综合效益评价[J]. 中国建筑金属结构, 2025, 24(13): 196-198.
[6] 徐可西, 苏婕妤, 鲍海君. 城市更新多元协同治理的实践路径与内在机制——基于杭州的探索性案例研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(6): 1451-1467.
[7] Yin, L.X. and Tang, H.Y. (2025) Study on the Path of Integrated District Renewal Based on Public-Private Collaboration: Experiences of Britain, the United States, France, and Japan and Implications for China. International Journal of Urban Planning, 2025, 1-19.
[8] Johnson, C. and Chakravarty, A. (2013) Re-Thinking the Role of Compensation in Urban Land Acquisition: Empirical Evidence from South Asia. Land, 2, 278-303.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land2020278
[9] Vejchodská, E., Hartmann, T. and Alterman, R. (2023) Land Value Capture: Dynamics and Diversity of Instruments and Strategies. Town Planning Review, 94, 116-123.
https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2023.9