超临界压力下二氧化碳容器泄压影响因素研究
Study on Factors Affecting during Carbon Dioxide Vessel Decompression at Supercritical Pressure
DOI: 10.12677/NST.2021.91004, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 王俊峰, 黄彦平:中国核动力研究设计院,四川 成都;周 源*, 田耕源:四川大学物理学院,四川 成都
关键词: S-CO2动力循环系统超临界二氧化碳LOCA泄压喷放泄压时间Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle System Supercritical Carbon Dioxide LOCA Blowdown Decompression Time
摘要: CO2意外泄漏是超临界CO2动力循环系统主要安全问题之一。本文基于一套小规模实验装置研究超临界CO2容器快速泄压特点,压力容器体积为50.0 L。测量了不同破口尺寸(1.0~5.0 mm),初始压力(8.1~12 MPa)和初始温度(35℃~50℃)条件下超临界CO2容器泄漏过程中介质压力和温度以及质量流量,分析了容器泄漏过程中泄压特性以及参数影响机制。通过分析得到,初始温度高于和低于拟临界温度,超临界CO2容器泄压会经历不同泄压过程。初始温度低于拟临界温度,泄压时工质温度下降的更低。泄压时间主要与破口尺寸和初始压力有关。本文的实验结果对理解事故过程和验证模型具有重要意义。
Abstract: The accidental release is one of the main risks of supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) power cycle system. In this paper, supercritical CO2 decompression experiments were studied based on a set of small-scale experimental equipment. The volume of vessel is 50 L. The pressure, temperature and mass flow rate during supercritical CO2 vessel release were measured with various leakage diameters (1.0 mm~5.0 mm), initial temperature (35˚C~50˚C) and initial pressure (8.1 MPa~12 MPa). The decompression characteristics and influence mechanism of parameters were analyzed. From the experiment data, as the initial temperature is higher or lower than the pseudo critical temperature, the supercritical CO2 vessel decompression undergoes different decompression process. As initial temperature is lower than pseudo critical temperature, fluid temperature is lower. The decompression time is mainly related to leakage diameters and initial pressure. The results of experiments are of great significance for understanding process of accident and model development.
文章引用:王俊峰, 周源, 黄彦平, 田耕源. 超临界压力下二氧化碳容器泄压影响因素研究[J]. 核科学与技术, 2021, 9(1): 29-37. https://doi.org/10.12677/NST.2021.91004

参考文献

[1] Dostal, V., Driscoll, M.J. and Heizlar, P. (2004) A Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycle for Next Generation Nuclear Reactors. MIT-ANP-TR-100.
[2] Huang, Y.P. and Wang, J.F. (2012) Applications of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in Nuclear Reactor System. Nuclear Power Engineering, 133, 21-27.
[3] Quattrocchi, F., Boschi, E., Spena, A., Buttinelli, M., Cantucci, B. and Procesi, M. (2013) Synergic and Conflicting Issues in Planning Underground Use to Produce Energy in Densely Populated Countries, as Italy: Geological Storage of CO2, Natural Gas, Geothermics and Nuclear Waste Disposal. Applied Energy, 101, 393-412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Mahgerefteh, H., Zhang, P. and Brown, S. (2016) Modelling Brittle Fracture Propagation in Gas and Dense-Phase CO2 Transportation Pipelines. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 46, 39-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Martynov, S., Brown, S., Mahgerefteh, H., Sundara, V., Chen, S.Y. and Zhang, Y.C. (2014) Modelling Three-Phase Releases of Carbon Dioxide from High-Pressure Pipelines. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 92, 36-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Gebbeken, B. and Eggers, R. (1996) Blowdown of Carbon Dioxide from Initially Supercritical Conditions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 9, 285-293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 那吉, 张戈, 杨燕华. 超临界压力状态氟利昂泄压实验研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2012, 46(6): 684-688.
[8] Koeijer, G.D., Borch, J.H., Jakobsenb, J. and Drescher, M. (2009) Experiments and Modeling of Two-Phase Transient Flow during CO2 Pipeline Depressurization. Energy Procedia, 1, 1683-1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Ahmad, M., Bögemann-van Osch, M., Buita, L., Florisson, O., Hulsbosch-Dam, C., Spruijt, M. and Davoliob, F. (2013) Study of the Thermohydraulics of CO2 Discharge from a High Pressure Reservoir. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 19, 63-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Hebrard, J., Jamois, D. and Proust, C. (2014) Hardware and Instrumentation to Investigate Massive Releases of Dense Phase CO2. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 93, 234-240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Hebrard, J., Jamois, D. and Proust, C. (2016) Medium Scale CO2 Releases. Energy Procedia, 86, 479-488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Li, K., Zhou, X., Tu, R., Xie, Q.Y. and Jiang, X. (2014) The Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics of Supercritical CO2 Leakage from a Pipeline. Energy, 71, 665-672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 李康. 小尺度超临界二氧化碳泄漏过程物理机理研究[J]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2016.
[14] Guo, X.L., Yan, X.Q., Yu, J.L., Zhang, Y.C., Chen, S.Y. and Mahgerefteh, H. (2016) Pressure Response and Phase Transition in Supercritical CO2 Releases from a Large-Scale Pipeline. Applied Energy, 178, 189-197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Guo, X.L., Yan, X.Q., Yu, J.L., Zhang, Y.C., Chen, S.Y. and Mahgerefteh, H. (2017) Pressure Responses and Phase Transitions during the Release of High Pressure CO2 from a Large-Scale Pipeline. Energy, 118, 1066-1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Xie, Q.Y., Ran, T.R., Xi, J.X., Li, K. and Zhou, X.J. (2014) The Leakage Behavior of Supercritical CO2 Flow in an Experimental Pipeline System. Applied Energy, 130, 574-580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Gu, S.W., Li, Y.X., Teng, L., Wang, C.L. and Hu, Q.H. (2019) An Experimental Study on the Flow Characteristics during the Leakage of High Pressure CO2 Pipelines. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 125, 92-101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 刘锋. 超临界压力CO2管道泄漏特征与扩散规律[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 清华大学, 2016.